Judith Herrmann , You-Shan Feng , Sebastian Gassenmaier , Jan-Peter Grunz , Gregor Koerzdoerfer , Andreas Lingg , Haidara Almansour , Dominik Nickel , Ahmed E. Othman , Saif Afat
{"title":"利用加速 TSE 序列和深度学习图像重建的 5 分钟快速肩部 MRI 方案,在 1.5 和 3 特斯拉下评估肩部疼痛","authors":"Judith Herrmann , You-Shan Feng , Sebastian Gassenmaier , Jan-Peter Grunz , Gregor Koerzdoerfer , Andreas Lingg , Haidara Almansour , Dominik Nickel , Ahmed E. Othman , Saif Afat","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSE<sub>S</sub>) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSE<sub>DL</sub>). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSE<sub>DL</sub> versus TSE<sub>S</sub> (p<0.001). Noise and edge sharpness were evaluated to be significantly superior in TSE<sub>DL</sub> versus TSE<sub>S</sub> (noise: p<0.001, edge sharpness: p<0.05). No difference was found concerning qualitative diagnostic confidence, assessability of anatomical structures (p>0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A fast 5-minute TSE<sub>DL</sub> MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSE<sub>S</sub> protocol.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000121/pdfft?md5=df816e81c966501a976ddf7cd8c5db21&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast 5-minute shoulder MRI protocol with accelerated TSE-sequences and deep learning image reconstruction for the assessment of shoulder pain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla\",\"authors\":\"Judith Herrmann , You-Shan Feng , Sebastian Gassenmaier , Jan-Peter Grunz , Gregor Koerzdoerfer , Andreas Lingg , Haidara Almansour , Dominik Nickel , Ahmed E. Othman , Saif Afat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSE<sub>S</sub>) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSE<sub>DL</sub>). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSE<sub>DL</sub> versus TSE<sub>S</sub> (p<0.001). Noise and edge sharpness were evaluated to be significantly superior in TSE<sub>DL</sub> versus TSE<sub>S</sub> (noise: p<0.001, edge sharpness: p<0.05). No difference was found concerning qualitative diagnostic confidence, assessability of anatomical structures (p>0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A fast 5-minute TSE<sub>DL</sub> MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSE<sub>S</sub> protocol.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000121/pdfft?md5=df816e81c966501a976ddf7cd8c5db21&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000121-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fast 5-minute shoulder MRI protocol with accelerated TSE-sequences and deep learning image reconstruction for the assessment of shoulder pain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla
Purpose
The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol.
Methods
Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSES) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols.
Results
A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSEDL versus TSES (p<0.001). Noise and edge sharpness were evaluated to be significantly superior in TSEDL versus TSES (noise: p<0.001, edge sharpness: p<0.05). No difference was found concerning qualitative diagnostic confidence, assessability of anatomical structures (p>0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences.
Conclusions
A fast 5-minute TSEDL MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSES protocol.