Manu P Bilsen, Simon P Conroy, Caroline Schneeberger, Tamara N Platteel, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Lona Mody, Jeffrey M Caterino, Suzanne E Geerlings, Bela Köves, Florian Wagenlehner, Marleen Kunneman, Leo G Visser, Merel M C Lambregts
{"title":"尿路感染研究参考标准:多学科德尔菲共识研究。","authors":"Manu P Bilsen, Simon P Conroy, Caroline Schneeberger, Tamara N Platteel, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Lona Mody, Jeffrey M Caterino, Suzanne E Geerlings, Bela Köves, Florian Wagenlehner, Marleen Kunneman, Leo G Visser, Merel M C Lambregts","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The absence of a consensus-based reference standard for urinary tract infection (UTI) research adversely affects the internal and external validity of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. This omission hinders the accumulation of evidence for a disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients and society, particularly in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. We did a three-round Delphi study involving an international, multidisciplinary panel of UTI experts (n=46) and achieved a high degree of consensus (94%) on the final reference standard. New-onset dysuria, urinary frequency, and urinary urgency were considered major symptoms, and non-specific symptoms in older patients were not deemed indicative of UTI. The reference standard distinguishes between UTI with and without systemic involvement, abandoning the term complicated UTI. Moreover, different levels of pyuria were incorporated in the reference standard, encouraging quantification of pyuria in studies done in all health-care settings. The traditional bacteriuria threshold (10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units per mL) was lowered to 10<sup>4</sup> colony-forming units per mL. This new reference standard can be used for UTI research across many patient populations and has the potential to increase homogeneity between studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49923,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":36.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reference standard for urinary tract infection research: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Manu P Bilsen, Simon P Conroy, Caroline Schneeberger, Tamara N Platteel, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Lona Mody, Jeffrey M Caterino, Suzanne E Geerlings, Bela Köves, Florian Wagenlehner, Marleen Kunneman, Leo G Visser, Merel M C Lambregts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00778-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The absence of a consensus-based reference standard for urinary tract infection (UTI) research adversely affects the internal and external validity of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. This omission hinders the accumulation of evidence for a disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients and society, particularly in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. We did a three-round Delphi study involving an international, multidisciplinary panel of UTI experts (n=46) and achieved a high degree of consensus (94%) on the final reference standard. New-onset dysuria, urinary frequency, and urinary urgency were considered major symptoms, and non-specific symptoms in older patients were not deemed indicative of UTI. The reference standard distinguishes between UTI with and without systemic involvement, abandoning the term complicated UTI. Moreover, different levels of pyuria were incorporated in the reference standard, encouraging quantification of pyuria in studies done in all health-care settings. The traditional bacteriuria threshold (10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units per mL) was lowered to 10<sup>4</sup> colony-forming units per mL. This new reference standard can be used for UTI research across many patient populations and has the potential to increase homogeneity between studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":36.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00778-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00778-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尿路感染(UTI)研究缺乏基于共识的参考标准,这对诊断和治疗研究的内部和外部有效性产生了不利影响。尤其是在抗菌药耐药性不断增加的时代,这种缺失阻碍了针对给患者和社会造成巨大负担的疾病的证据积累。我们进行了三轮德尔菲研究,邀请了国际多学科UTI专家小组(人数=46)参与,并就最终参考标准达成了高度共识(94%)。新发排尿困难、尿频和尿急被认为是主要症状,而老年患者的非特异性症状不被认为是 UTI 的指征。参考标准区分了有无全身受累的尿毒症,放弃了复杂性尿毒症这一术语。此外,参考标准还纳入了不同程度的脓尿,鼓励在所有医疗机构的研究中对脓尿进行量化。传统的菌尿阈值(每毫升 105 个菌落形成单位)降低到了每毫升 104 个菌落形成单位。这一新的参考标准可用于许多患者群体的UTI研究,并有可能提高研究之间的同质性。
A reference standard for urinary tract infection research: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study.
The absence of a consensus-based reference standard for urinary tract infection (UTI) research adversely affects the internal and external validity of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. This omission hinders the accumulation of evidence for a disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients and society, particularly in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. We did a three-round Delphi study involving an international, multidisciplinary panel of UTI experts (n=46) and achieved a high degree of consensus (94%) on the final reference standard. New-onset dysuria, urinary frequency, and urinary urgency were considered major symptoms, and non-specific symptoms in older patients were not deemed indicative of UTI. The reference standard distinguishes between UTI with and without systemic involvement, abandoning the term complicated UTI. Moreover, different levels of pyuria were incorporated in the reference standard, encouraging quantification of pyuria in studies done in all health-care settings. The traditional bacteriuria threshold (105 colony-forming units per mL) was lowered to 104 colony-forming units per mL. This new reference standard can be used for UTI research across many patient populations and has the potential to increase homogeneity between studies.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Infectious Diseases was launched in August, 2001, and is a lively monthly journal of original research, review, opinion, and news covering international issues relevant to clinical infectious diseases specialists worldwide.The infectious diseases journal aims to be a world-leading publication, featuring original research that advocates change or sheds light on clinical practices related to infectious diseases. The journal prioritizes articles with the potential to impact clinical practice or influence perspectives. Content covers a wide range of topics, including anti-infective therapy and immunization, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, emerging infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, mycobacterial infections, infection control, infectious diseases epidemiology, neglected tropical diseases, and travel medicine. Informative reviews on any subject linked to infectious diseases and human health are also welcomed.