延长护齿的使用寿命:表面处理对防止因刷牙和接触消毒剂而老化的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental Traumatology Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/edt.12941
Larissa Haddad e Borro, Talita Suelen de Queiroz, Beatriz Serralheiro da Cruz, Amir Mohidin Demachkia, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Tarcisio Jose de Arruda Paes Junior
{"title":"延长护齿的使用寿命:表面处理对防止因刷牙和接触消毒剂而老化的影响。","authors":"Larissa Haddad e Borro,&nbsp;Talita Suelen de Queiroz,&nbsp;Beatriz Serralheiro da Cruz,&nbsp;Amir Mohidin Demachkia,&nbsp;Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges,&nbsp;João Paulo Mendes Tribst,&nbsp;Tarcisio Jose de Arruda Paes Junior","doi":"10.1111/edt.12941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The study aimed to assess the surface characteristics of sports mouthguards under mechanical stresses during cleaning, either by brushing or immersion in disinfectant solutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ethylene-vinyl acetate samples, 4 mm thick, were randomly assigned to cleaning methods: control (C—no cleaning), brushing with water (B.W), brushing with neutral liquid soap (B.S), brushing with toothpaste (B.T), immersion in distilled water for 10 min (I.W), immersion in 2.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (I.SH), and immersion in sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 min (I.SB). All cleaning methods were applied for 28 days. Surface roughness average (Ra) and wettability were measured at baseline for the control group (<i>n</i> = 9), and after cleaning for all the other groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One-way ANOVA with Tukey tests (5% significance) indicated significant differences among groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The I.SB group had higher surface roughness than B.S and B.T (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). B.W showed the lowest wettability, significantly lower than B.T, I.W, and I.SB (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). I.SB exhibited the highest wettability, significantly different from sodium hypochlorite, neutral liquid soap, brushing with water, and control groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The sodium bicarbonate immersion group (I.SB) demonstrated greater statistical variation, displaying higher susceptibility to aging compared to brushing with neutral liquid soap.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Cleaning mouthguards with a toothbrush, water, and neutral liquid soap emerged as the most promising method, causing minimal surface changes in the material.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":"40 4","pages":"453-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/edt.12941","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing mouthguard longevity: Impact of surface treatment against aging from brushing and disinfectant exposure\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Haddad e Borro,&nbsp;Talita Suelen de Queiroz,&nbsp;Beatriz Serralheiro da Cruz,&nbsp;Amir Mohidin Demachkia,&nbsp;Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges,&nbsp;João Paulo Mendes Tribst,&nbsp;Tarcisio Jose de Arruda Paes Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/edt.12941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background/Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study aimed to assess the surface characteristics of sports mouthguards under mechanical stresses during cleaning, either by brushing or immersion in disinfectant solutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ethylene-vinyl acetate samples, 4 mm thick, were randomly assigned to cleaning methods: control (C—no cleaning), brushing with water (B.W), brushing with neutral liquid soap (B.S), brushing with toothpaste (B.T), immersion in distilled water for 10 min (I.W), immersion in 2.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (I.SH), and immersion in sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 min (I.SB). All cleaning methods were applied for 28 days. Surface roughness average (Ra) and wettability were measured at baseline for the control group (<i>n</i> = 9), and after cleaning for all the other groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>One-way ANOVA with Tukey tests (5% significance) indicated significant differences among groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The I.SB group had higher surface roughness than B.S and B.T (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). B.W showed the lowest wettability, significantly lower than B.T, I.W, and I.SB (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). I.SB exhibited the highest wettability, significantly different from sodium hypochlorite, neutral liquid soap, brushing with water, and control groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The sodium bicarbonate immersion group (I.SB) demonstrated greater statistical variation, displaying higher susceptibility to aging compared to brushing with neutral liquid soap.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cleaning mouthguards with a toothbrush, water, and neutral liquid soap emerged as the most promising method, causing minimal surface changes in the material.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"453-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/edt.12941\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edt.12941\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edt.12941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估运动护齿在刷洗或浸泡在消毒剂溶液中进行清洁时,在机械应力作用下的表面特性:将厚度为 4 毫米的乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯样品随机分配到不同的清洁方法中:对照组(C-不清洁)、用水刷洗(B.W)、用中性肥皂液刷洗(B.S)、用牙膏刷洗(B.T)、在蒸馏水中浸泡 10 分钟(I.W)、在 2.25% 次氯酸钠溶液中浸泡 10 分钟(I.SH)以及在碳酸氢钠溶液中浸泡 5 分钟(I.SB)。所有清洁方法均持续 28 天。对照组(n = 9)在基线时测量表面粗糙度平均值(Ra)和润湿性,所有其他组在清洗后测量表面粗糙度平均值(Ra)和润湿性:结果:单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(显著性为 5%)表明,各组之间存在显著差异(p 结论:用牙刷清洁护齿时,各组之间存在显著差异:用牙刷、水和中性皂液清洁护齿是最有效的方法,对材料表面的改变最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing mouthguard longevity: Impact of surface treatment against aging from brushing and disinfectant exposure

Background/Aims

The study aimed to assess the surface characteristics of sports mouthguards under mechanical stresses during cleaning, either by brushing or immersion in disinfectant solutions.

Material and Methods

Ethylene-vinyl acetate samples, 4 mm thick, were randomly assigned to cleaning methods: control (C—no cleaning), brushing with water (B.W), brushing with neutral liquid soap (B.S), brushing with toothpaste (B.T), immersion in distilled water for 10 min (I.W), immersion in 2.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (I.SH), and immersion in sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 min (I.SB). All cleaning methods were applied for 28 days. Surface roughness average (Ra) and wettability were measured at baseline for the control group (n = 9), and after cleaning for all the other groups.

Results

One-way ANOVA with Tukey tests (5% significance) indicated significant differences among groups (p < .05). The I.SB group had higher surface roughness than B.S and B.T (p < .05). B.W showed the lowest wettability, significantly lower than B.T, I.W, and I.SB (p < .05). I.SB exhibited the highest wettability, significantly different from sodium hypochlorite, neutral liquid soap, brushing with water, and control groups (p < .05). The sodium bicarbonate immersion group (I.SB) demonstrated greater statistical variation, displaying higher susceptibility to aging compared to brushing with neutral liquid soap.

Conclusion

Cleaning mouthguards with a toothbrush, water, and neutral liquid soap emerged as the most promising method, causing minimal surface changes in the material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Traumatology
Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
32.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Pattern of Traumatic Dental Injuries in Children and Adolescents With Severe to Profound Hearing Impairment: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Comparative Effectiveness of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment Versus Apexification for Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth With or Without Apical Periodontitis: An Umbrella Review. Urban Violence and Maxillofacial Trauma: Sex Differences in a Cross-Sectional Study From Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The Calcium Hydroxide Controversy: Does Calcium Hydroxide Weaken Teeth? The Impact of Traumatic Dental Injury on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Preschool Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1