探索使用交错刺激测量人工耳蜗的激励模式

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2
François Guérit, John C Middlebrooks, Robin Gransier, Matthew L Richardson, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon
{"title":"探索使用交错刺激测量人工耳蜗的激励模式","authors":"François Guérit, John C Middlebrooks, Robin Gransier, Matthew L Richardson, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon","doi":"10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Attempts to use current-focussing strategies with cochlear implants (CI) to reduce neural spread-of-excitation have met with only mixed success in human studies, in contrast to promising results in animal studies. Although this discrepancy could stem from between-species anatomical and aetiological differences, the masking experiments used in human studies may be insufficiently sensitive to differences in excitation-pattern width.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an interleaved-masking method to measure psychophysical excitation patterns in seven participants with four masker stimulation configurations: monopolar (MP), partial tripolar (pTP), a wider partial tripolar (pTP + 2), and, importantly, a condition (RP + 2) designed to produce a broader excitation pattern than MP. The probe was always in partial-tripolar configuration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant effect of stimulation configuration on both the amount of on-site masking (mask and probe on same electrode; an indirect indicator of sharpness) and the difference between off-site and on-site masking. Differences were driven solely by RP + 2 producing a broader excitation pattern than the other configurations, whereas monopolar and the two current-focussing configurations did not statistically differ from each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A method that is sensitive enough to reveal a modest broadening in RP + 2 showed no evidence for sharpening with focussed stimulation. We also showed that although voltage recordings from the implant accurately predicted a broadening of the psychophysical excitation patterns with RP + 2, they wrongly predicted a strong sharpening with pTP + 2. We additionally argue, based on our recent research, that the interleaved-masking method can usefully be applied to non-human species and objective measures of CI excitation patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"201-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"François Guérit, John C Middlebrooks, Robin Gransier, Matthew L Richardson, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Attempts to use current-focussing strategies with cochlear implants (CI) to reduce neural spread-of-excitation have met with only mixed success in human studies, in contrast to promising results in animal studies. Although this discrepancy could stem from between-species anatomical and aetiological differences, the masking experiments used in human studies may be insufficiently sensitive to differences in excitation-pattern width.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an interleaved-masking method to measure psychophysical excitation patterns in seven participants with four masker stimulation configurations: monopolar (MP), partial tripolar (pTP), a wider partial tripolar (pTP + 2), and, importantly, a condition (RP + 2) designed to produce a broader excitation pattern than MP. The probe was always in partial-tripolar configuration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant effect of stimulation configuration on both the amount of on-site masking (mask and probe on same electrode; an indirect indicator of sharpness) and the difference between off-site and on-site masking. Differences were driven solely by RP + 2 producing a broader excitation pattern than the other configurations, whereas monopolar and the two current-focussing configurations did not statistically differ from each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A method that is sensitive enough to reveal a modest broadening in RP + 2 showed no evidence for sharpening with focussed stimulation. We also showed that although voltage recordings from the implant accurately predicted a broadening of the psychophysical excitation patterns with RP + 2, they wrongly predicted a strong sharpening with pTP + 2. We additionally argue, based on our recent research, that the interleaved-masking method can usefully be applied to non-human species and objective measures of CI excitation patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"201-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018570/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在人类研究中,试图利用人工耳蜗(CI)的电流聚焦策略来减少神经兴奋扩散的尝试只取得了喜忧参半的结果,这与动物研究中的良好结果形成了鲜明对比。虽然这种差异可能源于物种间的解剖学和病因学差异,但人类研究中使用的掩蔽实验可能对激发模式宽度的差异不够敏感:我们使用交错掩蔽法测量了七名参与者的心理物理兴奋模式,并使用了四种掩蔽器刺激配置:单极(MP)、部分三极(pTP)、更宽的部分三极(pTP + 2),以及重要的、旨在产生比 MP 更宽兴奋模式的条件(RP + 2)。探针始终处于部分三极配置状态:结果:我们发现,刺激配置对现场遮蔽(遮蔽和探针位于同一电极上;锐利度的间接指标)的数量以及场外遮蔽和现场遮蔽之间的差异均有明显影响。造成差异的唯一原因是 RP + 2 比其他配置产生更宽的激励模式,而单极和两种电流聚焦配置在统计学上没有差异:结论:一种灵敏度足以揭示 RP + 2 中适度拓宽的方法在聚焦刺激时没有显示出锐化的迹象。我们还发现,虽然植入体的电压记录准确地预测了 RP + 2 时心理物理兴奋模式的扩大,但却错误地预测了 pTP + 2 时的强烈锐化。此外,我们还根据最近的研究认为,交错掩蔽法可以有效地应用于非人类物种和 CI 兴奋模式的客观测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.

Purpose: Attempts to use current-focussing strategies with cochlear implants (CI) to reduce neural spread-of-excitation have met with only mixed success in human studies, in contrast to promising results in animal studies. Although this discrepancy could stem from between-species anatomical and aetiological differences, the masking experiments used in human studies may be insufficiently sensitive to differences in excitation-pattern width.

Methods: We used an interleaved-masking method to measure psychophysical excitation patterns in seven participants with four masker stimulation configurations: monopolar (MP), partial tripolar (pTP), a wider partial tripolar (pTP + 2), and, importantly, a condition (RP + 2) designed to produce a broader excitation pattern than MP. The probe was always in partial-tripolar configuration.

Results: We found a significant effect of stimulation configuration on both the amount of on-site masking (mask and probe on same electrode; an indirect indicator of sharpness) and the difference between off-site and on-site masking. Differences were driven solely by RP + 2 producing a broader excitation pattern than the other configurations, whereas monopolar and the two current-focussing configurations did not statistically differ from each other.

Conclusion: A method that is sensitive enough to reveal a modest broadening in RP + 2 showed no evidence for sharpening with focussed stimulation. We also showed that although voltage recordings from the implant accurately predicted a broadening of the psychophysical excitation patterns with RP + 2, they wrongly predicted a strong sharpening with pTP + 2. We additionally argue, based on our recent research, that the interleaved-masking method can usefully be applied to non-human species and objective measures of CI excitation patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Correlation Between Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Group Delays and Tuning Sharpness in a Cochlear Model. Tuning and Timing of Organ of Corti Vibrations at the Apex of the Intact Chinchilla Cochlea. Vital Dye Uptake of YO-PRO-1 and DASPEI Depends Upon Mechanoelectrical Transduction Function in Zebrafish Hair Cells. Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method. Eric Daniel Young.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1