男性甲基苯丙胺滥用者的反馈处理功能障碍:来自神经生理学和计算方法的证据。

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108847
Sadegh Ghaderi, Jamal Amani Rad, Mohammad Hemami, Reza Khosrowabadi
{"title":"男性甲基苯丙胺滥用者的反馈处理功能障碍:来自神经生理学和计算方法的证据。","authors":"Sadegh Ghaderi,&nbsp;Jamal Amani Rad,&nbsp;Mohammad Hemami,&nbsp;Reza Khosrowabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) as a major public health risk is associated with dysfunctional neural feedback processing. Although dysfunctional feedback processing in people who are substance dependent has been explored in several behavioral, computational, and electrocortical studies, this mechanism in MUDs requires to be well understood. Furthermore, the current understanding of latent components of their behavior such as learning speed and exploration-exploitation dilemma is still limited. In addition, the association between the latent cognitive components and the related neural mechanisms also needs to be explored. Therefore, in this study, the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms of feedback processing of such impairment, and age/gender-matched healthy controls are evaluated within a probabilistic learning task with rewards and punishments. Mathematical modeling results based on the Q-learning paradigm suggested that MUDs show less sensitivity in distinguishing optimal options. Additionally, it may be worth noting that MUDs exhibited a slight decrease in their ability to learn from negative feedback compared to healthy controls. Also through the lens of underlying neural mechanisms, MUDs showed lower theta power at the medial-frontal areas while responding to negative feedback. However, other EEG measures of reinforcement learning including feedback-related negativity, parietal-P300, and activity flow from the medial frontal to lateral prefrontal regions, remained intact in MUDs. On the other hand, the elimination of the linkage between value sensitivity and medial-frontal theta activity in MUDs was observed. The observed dysfunction could be due to the adverse effects of methamphetamine on the cortico-striatal dopamine circuit, which is reflected in the anterior cingulate cortex activity as the most likely region responsible for efficient behavior adjustment. These findings could help us to pave the way toward tailored therapeutic approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dysfunctional feedback processing in male methamphetamine abusers: Evidence from neurophysiological and computational approaches\",\"authors\":\"Sadegh Ghaderi,&nbsp;Jamal Amani Rad,&nbsp;Mohammad Hemami,&nbsp;Reza Khosrowabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) as a major public health risk is associated with dysfunctional neural feedback processing. Although dysfunctional feedback processing in people who are substance dependent has been explored in several behavioral, computational, and electrocortical studies, this mechanism in MUDs requires to be well understood. Furthermore, the current understanding of latent components of their behavior such as learning speed and exploration-exploitation dilemma is still limited. In addition, the association between the latent cognitive components and the related neural mechanisms also needs to be explored. Therefore, in this study, the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms of feedback processing of such impairment, and age/gender-matched healthy controls are evaluated within a probabilistic learning task with rewards and punishments. Mathematical modeling results based on the Q-learning paradigm suggested that MUDs show less sensitivity in distinguishing optimal options. Additionally, it may be worth noting that MUDs exhibited a slight decrease in their ability to learn from negative feedback compared to healthy controls. Also through the lens of underlying neural mechanisms, MUDs showed lower theta power at the medial-frontal areas while responding to negative feedback. However, other EEG measures of reinforcement learning including feedback-related negativity, parietal-P300, and activity flow from the medial frontal to lateral prefrontal regions, remained intact in MUDs. On the other hand, the elimination of the linkage between value sensitivity and medial-frontal theta activity in MUDs was observed. The observed dysfunction could be due to the adverse effects of methamphetamine on the cortico-striatal dopamine circuit, which is reflected in the anterior cingulate cortex activity as the most likely region responsible for efficient behavior adjustment. These findings could help us to pave the way toward tailored therapeutic approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224000629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224000629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)作为一种主要的公共健康风险,与神经反馈处理功能失调有关。虽然已有多项行为学、计算学和皮层电学研究探讨了药物依赖者的反馈处理功能障碍,但对甲基苯丙胺使用障碍者的这一机制仍有待深入了解。此外,目前对他们行为的潜在成分(如学习速度和探索-利用困境)的了解仍然有限。此外,潜在认知成分与相关神经机制之间的关联也有待探索。因此,在本研究中,我们在一个有奖惩的概率学习任务中,评估了这类障碍者和年龄/性别匹配的健康对照组在反馈处理方面的潜在神经认知机制。基于 Q 学习范式的数学建模结果表明,MUDs 在区分最优选项方面表现出较低的敏感性。此外,值得注意的是,与健康对照组相比,MUD 从负反馈中学习的能力略有下降。同样从潜在神经机制的角度来看,MUDs 在对负面反馈做出反应时,其内侧额叶区域的 Theta 功率较低。然而,强化学习的其他脑电图测量指标,包括反馈相关负性、顶叶-P300以及从内侧额叶到外侧前额叶区域的活动流,在 MUDs 中仍然保持不变。另一方面,在 MUDs 中观察到价值敏感性与内侧额叶θ活动之间的联系消失了。所观察到的功能障碍可能是由于甲基苯丙胺对皮质-纹状体多巴胺回路的不利影响,这反映在前扣带回皮层的活动上,而扣带回皮层最有可能是负责有效调整行为的区域。这些发现有助于我们为量身定制的治疗方法铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dysfunctional feedback processing in male methamphetamine abusers: Evidence from neurophysiological and computational approaches

Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) as a major public health risk is associated with dysfunctional neural feedback processing. Although dysfunctional feedback processing in people who are substance dependent has been explored in several behavioral, computational, and electrocortical studies, this mechanism in MUDs requires to be well understood. Furthermore, the current understanding of latent components of their behavior such as learning speed and exploration-exploitation dilemma is still limited. In addition, the association between the latent cognitive components and the related neural mechanisms also needs to be explored. Therefore, in this study, the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms of feedback processing of such impairment, and age/gender-matched healthy controls are evaluated within a probabilistic learning task with rewards and punishments. Mathematical modeling results based on the Q-learning paradigm suggested that MUDs show less sensitivity in distinguishing optimal options. Additionally, it may be worth noting that MUDs exhibited a slight decrease in their ability to learn from negative feedback compared to healthy controls. Also through the lens of underlying neural mechanisms, MUDs showed lower theta power at the medial-frontal areas while responding to negative feedback. However, other EEG measures of reinforcement learning including feedback-related negativity, parietal-P300, and activity flow from the medial frontal to lateral prefrontal regions, remained intact in MUDs. On the other hand, the elimination of the linkage between value sensitivity and medial-frontal theta activity in MUDs was observed. The observed dysfunction could be due to the adverse effects of methamphetamine on the cortico-striatal dopamine circuit, which is reflected in the anterior cingulate cortex activity as the most likely region responsible for efficient behavior adjustment. These findings could help us to pave the way toward tailored therapeutic approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
On the lasting impact of mild traumatic brain injury on working memory: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence Functional connectivity of sensorimotor network before and after surgery in the supplementary motor area Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG Joyful growth vs. compulsive hedonism: A meta-analysis of brain activation on romantic love and addictive disorders Using imagination and the contents of memory to create new scene and object representations: A functional MRI study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1