与有学习障碍的人共同制定道德准则

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL British Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/bld.12590
Mary Bottomley, Jodie Bradley, Lisa Clark, Bryan Collis, Bojana Daw Srdanovic, Victoria Farnsworth, Annie Ferguson, Dan Goodley, Andrew Fox, Nikita K. Hayden, Charlotte Lawthom, Rebecca Lawthom, Claudia Magwood, Robert McLean, Ian Middleton, Alison Owen, Matty Prothero, Simon Rice, Simon Richards, Katherine Runswick-Cole, Kelly Scargill, Rohit Shankar, Toni Ann Wood
{"title":"与有学习障碍的人共同制定道德准则","authors":"Mary Bottomley,&nbsp;Jodie Bradley,&nbsp;Lisa Clark,&nbsp;Bryan Collis,&nbsp;Bojana Daw Srdanovic,&nbsp;Victoria Farnsworth,&nbsp;Annie Ferguson,&nbsp;Dan Goodley,&nbsp;Andrew Fox,&nbsp;Nikita K. Hayden,&nbsp;Charlotte Lawthom,&nbsp;Rebecca Lawthom,&nbsp;Claudia Magwood,&nbsp;Robert McLean,&nbsp;Ian Middleton,&nbsp;Alison Owen,&nbsp;Matty Prothero,&nbsp;Simon Rice,&nbsp;Simon Richards,&nbsp;Katherine Runswick-Cole,&nbsp;Kelly Scargill,&nbsp;Rohit Shankar,&nbsp;Toni Ann Wood","doi":"10.1111/bld.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We are a research team of clinical, academic and advocacy-based researchers with and without learning disabilities, working on the <i>Humanising Healthcare</i> (for people with learning disabilities) project. The project is dedicated to finding and sharing healthcare practices that enhance the lives of people with learning disabilities. As part of our ethics applications to access National Health Service study sites for fieldwork, we worked together to write guiding principles for co-producing research ethics with researchers with learning disabilities. In this paper, we introduce these Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines and reflect on our collaboration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reflect on developing the Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines. These guidelines were developed during online co-production meetings with our full research team, including advocacy-based organisation researchers, clinical researchers and university researchers. We considered consent, understanding research, and understanding research methods during the development of these Guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We present ten guidelines for co-producing research with people with learning disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings may be helpful to researchers with learning disabilities, university and clinical researchers, funders, and those who work in research governance (e.g., ethics committees and university research departments).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"52 4","pages":"611-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.12590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-producing ethics guidelines together with people with learning disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Mary Bottomley,&nbsp;Jodie Bradley,&nbsp;Lisa Clark,&nbsp;Bryan Collis,&nbsp;Bojana Daw Srdanovic,&nbsp;Victoria Farnsworth,&nbsp;Annie Ferguson,&nbsp;Dan Goodley,&nbsp;Andrew Fox,&nbsp;Nikita K. Hayden,&nbsp;Charlotte Lawthom,&nbsp;Rebecca Lawthom,&nbsp;Claudia Magwood,&nbsp;Robert McLean,&nbsp;Ian Middleton,&nbsp;Alison Owen,&nbsp;Matty Prothero,&nbsp;Simon Rice,&nbsp;Simon Richards,&nbsp;Katherine Runswick-Cole,&nbsp;Kelly Scargill,&nbsp;Rohit Shankar,&nbsp;Toni Ann Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bld.12590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We are a research team of clinical, academic and advocacy-based researchers with and without learning disabilities, working on the <i>Humanising Healthcare</i> (for people with learning disabilities) project. The project is dedicated to finding and sharing healthcare practices that enhance the lives of people with learning disabilities. As part of our ethics applications to access National Health Service study sites for fieldwork, we worked together to write guiding principles for co-producing research ethics with researchers with learning disabilities. In this paper, we introduce these Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines and reflect on our collaboration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We reflect on developing the Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines. These guidelines were developed during online co-production meetings with our full research team, including advocacy-based organisation researchers, clinical researchers and university researchers. We considered consent, understanding research, and understanding research methods during the development of these Guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>We present ten guidelines for co-producing research with people with learning disabilities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings may be helpful to researchers with learning disabilities, university and clinical researchers, funders, and those who work in research governance (e.g., ethics committees and university research departments).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"611-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.12590\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12590\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景我们是一个由临床、学术和宣传研究人员组成的研究团队,成员中既有学习障碍者,也有非学习障碍者,我们致力于 "人性化医疗保健(针对学习障碍者)"项目。该项目致力于发现和分享能够改善学习障碍人士生活的医疗保健实践。作为我们申请进入国家卫生服务研究机构进行实地调查的伦理申请的一部分,我们共同编写了与有学习障碍的研究人员共同制定研究伦理的指导原则。在本文中,我们将介绍这些 "参与式伦理学良好实践指南",并对我们的合作进行反思。这些指南是在与我们整个研究团队(包括倡导型组织研究人员、临床研究人员和大学研究人员)举行的在线共同制作会议上制定的。结论我们的研究结果可能会对有学习障碍的研究人员、大学和临床研究人员、资助者以及从事研究管理的人员(如伦理委员会和大学研究部门)有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-producing ethics guidelines together with people with learning disabilities

Background

We are a research team of clinical, academic and advocacy-based researchers with and without learning disabilities, working on the Humanising Healthcare (for people with learning disabilities) project. The project is dedicated to finding and sharing healthcare practices that enhance the lives of people with learning disabilities. As part of our ethics applications to access National Health Service study sites for fieldwork, we worked together to write guiding principles for co-producing research ethics with researchers with learning disabilities. In this paper, we introduce these Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines and reflect on our collaboration.

Methods

We reflect on developing the Participatory Ethics Good Practice Guidelines. These guidelines were developed during online co-production meetings with our full research team, including advocacy-based organisation researchers, clinical researchers and university researchers. We considered consent, understanding research, and understanding research methods during the development of these Guidelines.

Findings

We present ten guidelines for co-producing research with people with learning disabilities.

Conclusions

Our findings may be helpful to researchers with learning disabilities, university and clinical researchers, funders, and those who work in research governance (e.g., ethics committees and university research departments).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information What Approaches Described in Research Literature Enhance the Engagement of Children and Young People With Severe or Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities? A Systematic Literature Review Staff Perceptions of Mental Health Relapse Prevention Support in a Specialist Mental Health Service in an Intellectual Disability Setting Item reduction of the “Support Intensity Scale” for people with intellectual disabilities, using machine learning Culturally adaptive healthcare for people with a learning disability from an ethnic minority background: A qualitative synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1