应用非线性传导模型和离子漂移扩散模型模拟高压直流 GIL 中气体传导的比较

COMPEL Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1108/compel-11-2023-0575
Hendrik Hensel, Markus Clemens
{"title":"应用非线性传导模型和离子漂移扩散模型模拟高压直流 GIL 中气体传导的比较","authors":"Hendrik Hensel, Markus Clemens","doi":"10.1108/compel-11-2023-0575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Gas insulated systems, such as gas insulated lines (GIL), use insulating gas, mostly sulfur hexalfluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>), to enable a higher dielectric strength compared to e.g. air. However, under high voltage direct current conditions, charge accumulation and electric field stress may occur, which may lead to partial discharge or system failure. Therefore, numerical simulations are used to design the system and determine the electric field and charge distribution. Although the gas conduction shows a more complex current–voltage characteristic compared to solid insulation, the electric conductivity of the SF<sub>6</sub> gas is set as constant in most works. The purpose of this study is to investigate different approaches to address the conduction in the gas properly for numerical simulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>In this work, two approaches are investigated to address the conduction in the insulating gas and are compared to each other. One method is an ion-drift-diffusion model, where the conduction in the gas is described by the ion motion in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas. However, this method is computationally expensive. Alternatively, a less complex approach is an electro-thermal model with the application of an electric conductivity model for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas. Measurements show that the electric conductivity in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas has a nonlinear dependency on temperature, electric field and gas pressure. From these measurements, an electric conductivity model was developed. Both methods are compared by simulation results, where different parameters and conditions are considered, to investigate the potential of the electric conductivity model as a computationally less expensive alternative.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The simulation results of both simulation approaches show similar results, proving the electric conductivity for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas as a valid alternative. Using the electro-thermal model approach with the application of the electric conductivity model enables a solution time up to six times faster compared to the ion-drift-diffusion model. The application of the model allows to examine the influence of different parameters such as temperature and gas pressure on the electric field distribution in the GIL, whereas the ion-drift-diffusion model enables to investigate the distribution of homo- and heteropolar charges in the insulation gas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This work presents numerical simulation models for high voltage direct current GIL, where the conduction in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas is described more precisely compared to a definition of a constant electric conductivity value for the insulation gas. The electric conductivity model for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas allows for consideration of the current–voltage characteristics of the gas, is computationally less expensive compared to an ion-drift diffusion model and needs considerably less solution time.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501376,"journal":{"name":"COMPEL","volume":"278 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of simulations of the gas conduction in HVDC GIL by application of nonlinear conductivity model and ion-drift-diffusion model\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Hensel, Markus Clemens\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/compel-11-2023-0575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Gas insulated systems, such as gas insulated lines (GIL), use insulating gas, mostly sulfur hexalfluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>), to enable a higher dielectric strength compared to e.g. air. However, under high voltage direct current conditions, charge accumulation and electric field stress may occur, which may lead to partial discharge or system failure. Therefore, numerical simulations are used to design the system and determine the electric field and charge distribution. Although the gas conduction shows a more complex current–voltage characteristic compared to solid insulation, the electric conductivity of the SF<sub>6</sub> gas is set as constant in most works. The purpose of this study is to investigate different approaches to address the conduction in the gas properly for numerical simulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>In this work, two approaches are investigated to address the conduction in the insulating gas and are compared to each other. One method is an ion-drift-diffusion model, where the conduction in the gas is described by the ion motion in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas. However, this method is computationally expensive. Alternatively, a less complex approach is an electro-thermal model with the application of an electric conductivity model for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas. Measurements show that the electric conductivity in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas has a nonlinear dependency on temperature, electric field and gas pressure. From these measurements, an electric conductivity model was developed. Both methods are compared by simulation results, where different parameters and conditions are considered, to investigate the potential of the electric conductivity model as a computationally less expensive alternative.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The simulation results of both simulation approaches show similar results, proving the electric conductivity for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas as a valid alternative. Using the electro-thermal model approach with the application of the electric conductivity model enables a solution time up to six times faster compared to the ion-drift-diffusion model. The application of the model allows to examine the influence of different parameters such as temperature and gas pressure on the electric field distribution in the GIL, whereas the ion-drift-diffusion model enables to investigate the distribution of homo- and heteropolar charges in the insulation gas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This work presents numerical simulation models for high voltage direct current GIL, where the conduction in the SF<sub>6</sub> gas is described more precisely compared to a definition of a constant electric conductivity value for the insulation gas. The electric conductivity model for the SF<sub>6</sub> gas allows for consideration of the current–voltage characteristics of the gas, is computationally less expensive compared to an ion-drift diffusion model and needs considerably less solution time.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":501376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPEL\",\"volume\":\"278 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPEL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-11-2023-0575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-11-2023-0575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的气体绝缘系统,如气体绝缘线路(GIL),使用绝缘气体,主要是六氟化硫(SF6),以获得比空气等更高的介电强度。然而,在高压直流条件下,可能会出现电荷积累和电场应力,从而导致局部放电或系统故障。因此,我们使用数值模拟来设计系统并确定电场和电荷分布。虽然与固体绝缘相比,气体传导显示出更复杂的电流-电压特性,但大多数研究都将 SF6 气体的导电率设定为常数。本研究的目的是调查不同的方法,以便在数值模拟中正确处理气体中的传导问题。在本研究中,调查了两种处理绝缘气体中传导问题的方法,并进行了比较。一种方法是离子漂移扩散模型,气体中的传导由 SF6 气体中的离子运动来描述。不过,这种方法的计算成本较高。另一种不太复杂的方法是应用 SF6 气体电导率模型的电热模型。测量结果表明,SF6 气体中的电导率与温度、电场和气体压力呈非线性关系。根据这些测量结果,建立了一个电导率模型。结果两种模拟方法的模拟结果显示出相似的结果,证明 SF6 气体的电导率是一种有效的替代方法。与离子漂移-扩散模型相比,使用电热模型方法并应用电导率模型可使求解时间缩短六倍。应用该模型可以研究温度和气体压力等不同参数对 GIL 中电场分布的影响,而离子漂移扩散模型则可以研究绝缘气体中同极和异极电荷的分布。SF6 气体的电导率模型允许考虑气体的电流-电压特性,与离子漂移扩散模型相比,计算成本更低,所需的求解时间也更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of simulations of the gas conduction in HVDC GIL by application of nonlinear conductivity model and ion-drift-diffusion model

Purpose

Gas insulated systems, such as gas insulated lines (GIL), use insulating gas, mostly sulfur hexalfluoride (SF6), to enable a higher dielectric strength compared to e.g. air. However, under high voltage direct current conditions, charge accumulation and electric field stress may occur, which may lead to partial discharge or system failure. Therefore, numerical simulations are used to design the system and determine the electric field and charge distribution. Although the gas conduction shows a more complex current–voltage characteristic compared to solid insulation, the electric conductivity of the SF6 gas is set as constant in most works. The purpose of this study is to investigate different approaches to address the conduction in the gas properly for numerical simulations.

Design/methodology/approach

In this work, two approaches are investigated to address the conduction in the insulating gas and are compared to each other. One method is an ion-drift-diffusion model, where the conduction in the gas is described by the ion motion in the SF6 gas. However, this method is computationally expensive. Alternatively, a less complex approach is an electro-thermal model with the application of an electric conductivity model for the SF6 gas. Measurements show that the electric conductivity in the SF6 gas has a nonlinear dependency on temperature, electric field and gas pressure. From these measurements, an electric conductivity model was developed. Both methods are compared by simulation results, where different parameters and conditions are considered, to investigate the potential of the electric conductivity model as a computationally less expensive alternative.

Findings

The simulation results of both simulation approaches show similar results, proving the electric conductivity for the SF6 gas as a valid alternative. Using the electro-thermal model approach with the application of the electric conductivity model enables a solution time up to six times faster compared to the ion-drift-diffusion model. The application of the model allows to examine the influence of different parameters such as temperature and gas pressure on the electric field distribution in the GIL, whereas the ion-drift-diffusion model enables to investigate the distribution of homo- and heteropolar charges in the insulation gas.

Originality/value

This work presents numerical simulation models for high voltage direct current GIL, where the conduction in the SF6 gas is described more precisely compared to a definition of a constant electric conductivity value for the insulation gas. The electric conductivity model for the SF6 gas allows for consideration of the current–voltage characteristics of the gas, is computationally less expensive compared to an ion-drift diffusion model and needs considerably less solution time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying the parameters of ultracapacitors based on variable forgetting factor recursive least square A compound reconfigurable series-fed microstrip antenna for satellite communication applications On-load magnetic field calculation for linear permanent-magnet actuators using hybrid 2-D finite-element method and Maxwell–Fourier analysis Design and analysis of double-permanent-magnet enhanced hybrid stepping machine with tangential and radial magnetization Dynamic J-A model improved by waveform scale parameters and R-L type fractional derivatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1