基于 "监测、流行病学和最终结果 "数据库,建立一个提名图模型,以确定转移性肾细胞癌细胞切除肾切除术的合适人选

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical genitourinary cancer Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.013
Kong Ren , Hao Ning , Hai-hu Wu , Fei Wu , Jia-ju Lyu
{"title":"基于 \"监测、流行病学和最终结果 \"数据库,建立一个提名图模型,以确定转移性肾细胞癌细胞切除肾切除术的合适人选","authors":"Kong Ren ,&nbsp;Hao Ning ,&nbsp;Hai-hu Wu ,&nbsp;Fei Wu ,&nbsp;Jia-ju Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although a survival benefit was observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), there is a lack of effective tools for predicting which individuals are likely to benefit from surgical intervention. Herein, we developed a predictive model using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with mRCC were screened from the SEER database (2010-2020), supplemented by patients from East Asia. Patients were categorized into surgical and non-surgical groups, with propensity score matching conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with benefits and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 11,044 cases from the SEER database and 50 cases from an external validation cohort. CN was identified as an independent protective factor for OS. A nomogram was established, and it performed well in the training and validation sets. The calibration curves and DCA confirmed that the nomogram model could precisely predict the probability of surgical benefit. We used the nomogram to classify surgical patients into benefit and non-benefit groups. Then, we found that OS was significantly higher in the benefit group than in the non-benefit group. The external validation cohort observed the same result (P=0.035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While CN offers potential benefits for patients with mRCC, its applicability varies across the patient population. Our study constructed a nomogram that quantitatively assesses the likelihood of surgical benefit in mRCC patients, facilitating more tailored therapeutic decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Nomogram Model to Identify Appropriate Candidates from Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database\",\"authors\":\"Kong Ren ,&nbsp;Hao Ning ,&nbsp;Hai-hu Wu ,&nbsp;Fei Wu ,&nbsp;Jia-ju Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although a survival benefit was observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), there is a lack of effective tools for predicting which individuals are likely to benefit from surgical intervention. Herein, we developed a predictive model using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with mRCC were screened from the SEER database (2010-2020), supplemented by patients from East Asia. Patients were categorized into surgical and non-surgical groups, with propensity score matching conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with benefits and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 11,044 cases from the SEER database and 50 cases from an external validation cohort. CN was identified as an independent protective factor for OS. A nomogram was established, and it performed well in the training and validation sets. The calibration curves and DCA confirmed that the nomogram model could precisely predict the probability of surgical benefit. We used the nomogram to classify surgical patients into benefit and non-benefit groups. Then, we found that OS was significantly higher in the benefit group than in the non-benefit group. The external validation cohort observed the same result (P=0.035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While CN offers potential benefits for patients with mRCC, its applicability varies across the patient population. Our study constructed a nomogram that quantitatively assesses the likelihood of surgical benefit in mRCC patients, facilitating more tailored therapeutic decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324000363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324000363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在评估与转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)细胞切除肾切除术(CN)相关的预后增强效应,并建立一个预测提名图,用于确定哪些患者最有可能从细胞切除肾切除术中获益。虽然在接受细胞切除肾切除术(CN)的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中观察到了生存获益,但缺乏有效的工具来预测哪些人可能从手术干预中获益。在此,我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的数据开发了一个预测模型。我们从 SEER 数据库(2010-2020 年)中筛选出被诊断为 mRCC 的患者,并补充了来自东亚的患者。患者被分为手术组和非手术组,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征。通过逻辑回归分析确定了与获益相关的独立因素,并根据这些因素构建了提名图。这项研究包括 SEER 数据库中的 11,044 例病例和外部验证队列中的 50 例病例。CN被确定为OS的独立保护因素(P<0.001)。建立的提名图在训练集和验证集中表现良好(AUC:0.786 和 0.761)。校准曲线和 DCA 证实,提名图模型可以精确预测手术获益的概率。我们使用提名图将手术患者分为获益组和非获益组。然后,我们发现获益组的 OS 明显高于非获益组。外部验证队列也观察到了同样的结果(P=0.035)。虽然 CN 可为 mRCC 患者带来潜在益处,但其适用性因患者群体而异。我们的研究构建了一个提名图,对mRCC患者手术获益的可能性进行定量评估,从而有助于做出更有针对性的治疗决策。我们的研究表明,CN 可改善 mRCC 的预后,但只有特定患者才能从 CN 中获益。目前还没有预测工具来确定哪些患者会受益。因此,我们的目标是利用 SEER 数据库中的数据开发一个提名图,以确定可从 CN 中获益的 mRCC 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Nomogram Model to Identify Appropriate Candidates from Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database

Background

Although a survival benefit was observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), there is a lack of effective tools for predicting which individuals are likely to benefit from surgical intervention. Herein, we developed a predictive model using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with mRCC were screened from the SEER database (2010-2020), supplemented by patients from East Asia. Patients were categorized into surgical and non-surgical groups, with propensity score matching conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with benefits and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors.

Results

This study included 11,044 cases from the SEER database and 50 cases from an external validation cohort. CN was identified as an independent protective factor for OS. A nomogram was established, and it performed well in the training and validation sets. The calibration curves and DCA confirmed that the nomogram model could precisely predict the probability of surgical benefit. We used the nomogram to classify surgical patients into benefit and non-benefit groups. Then, we found that OS was significantly higher in the benefit group than in the non-benefit group. The external validation cohort observed the same result (P=0.035).

Conclusion

While CN offers potential benefits for patients with mRCC, its applicability varies across the patient population. Our study constructed a nomogram that quantitatively assesses the likelihood of surgical benefit in mRCC patients, facilitating more tailored therapeutic decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Survival Outcomes by Race Following Surgical Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Adverse Health Outcomes 3 Years after Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Men in the General Population: A Study from the Cancer Registry of Norway Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: A Real-World Study Roles of Long Noncoding RNA in Prostate Cancer Pathogenesis Markers in Identifying Pathological Complete Response Status in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Achieved Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1