首页 > 最新文献

Clinical genitourinary cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Efficacy of IO–IO Versus IO–TKI Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma 质子泵抑制剂对IO-IO和IO-TKI治疗转移性肾细胞癌疗效的影响
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102500
Lan Inoki , Shingo Toyoda , Wataru Fukuokaya , Takafumi Yanagisawa , Teruo Inamoto , Takuhisa Nukaya , Kiyoshi Takahara , Takuya Tsujino , Ryoichi Maenosono , Kazumasa Komura , Kensuke Bekku , Motoo Araki , Takehiro Iwata , Kazutoshi Fujita , JK-FOOT study group

Basckground

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have become the standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), frequently used to treat gastrointestinal conditions, have been implicated in modulating ICI efficacy, potentially through gut microbiome dysbiosis. However, the impact of PPIs on ICI-based therapies for mRCC remains unclear.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 427 patients with mRCC classified as intermediate or poor risk according to the IMDC criteria treated with first-line IO-IO (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) or IO-TKI (ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor) therapies. Patients were stratified by PPI use during the 30 days before and including the day of ICI initiation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between PPI users and nonusers.

Results

PPI use was significantly associated with shorter OS in patients receiving IO-IO therapy (median OS, 23.34 months vs. not reached; P = .002), but not in those receiving IO-TKI therapy (P = .909). Multivariate analysis confirmed PPIs as an independent prognostic factor for OS in the IO-IO group (HR, 1.647; 95% CI, 1.007-2.693; P = .046). No significant differences in PFS or ORR were observed between PPI users and nonusers in either group, although the complete response rate was notably lower in PPI users treated with IO-IO (1.6% vs. 10.3%; P = .025).

Conclusions

PPI use was associated with inferior survival in mRCC patients receiving IO-IO therapy, potentially through microbiome modulation and other immunologic or clinical mechanisms; however, these findings are based on retrospective data and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Caution is advised when prescribing PPIs to patients undergoing ICI-based therapy, particularly IO-IO regimens, and prospective studies are needed to confirm whether avoiding unnecessary PPI use can improve clinical outcomes.
基于dimmune检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合治疗已成为转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准一线治疗方法。质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)经常用于治疗胃肠道疾病,可能通过肠道微生物群失调来调节ICI的疗效。然而,PPIs对基于ci的mRCC治疗的影响尚不清楚。方法本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了427例根据IMDC标准被分类为中度或低风险的mRCC患者,这些患者接受一线IO-IO(伊匹单抗+纳沃单抗)或IO-TKI (ICI +酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)治疗。根据患者在ICI开始前30天及开始当天的PPI使用情况对患者进行分层。比较PPI使用者和非PPI使用者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。结果接受IO-IO治疗的患者使用sppi与较短的生存期显著相关(中位生存期,23.34个月vs.未达到,P = 0.002),而接受IO-TKI治疗的患者使用sppi与较短的生存期显著相关(P = 0.09)。多因素分析证实ppi是IO-IO组OS的独立预后因素(HR, 1.647; 95% CI, 1.007-2.693; P = 0.046)。两组PPI使用者和非PPI使用者之间的PFS和ORR均无显著差异,但PPI使用者接受IO-IO治疗的完全缓解率明显较低(1.6% vs. 10.3%; P = 0.025)。结论:在接受IO-IO治疗的mRCC患者中,sppi的使用与较差的生存率相关,可能是通过微生物组调节和其他免疫或临床机制;然而,这些发现是基于回顾性数据,应该被视为假设生成。建议在给接受ici治疗的患者开PPI时要谨慎,尤其是IO-IO方案,并且需要前瞻性研究来确认避免不必要的PPI使用是否可以改善临床结果。
{"title":"Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Efficacy of IO–IO Versus IO–TKI Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Lan Inoki ,&nbsp;Shingo Toyoda ,&nbsp;Wataru Fukuokaya ,&nbsp;Takafumi Yanagisawa ,&nbsp;Teruo Inamoto ,&nbsp;Takuhisa Nukaya ,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Takahara ,&nbsp;Takuya Tsujino ,&nbsp;Ryoichi Maenosono ,&nbsp;Kazumasa Komura ,&nbsp;Kensuke Bekku ,&nbsp;Motoo Araki ,&nbsp;Takehiro Iwata ,&nbsp;Kazutoshi Fujita ,&nbsp;JK-FOOT study group","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102500","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102500","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Basckground</h3><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have become the standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), frequently used to treat gastrointestinal conditions, have been implicated in modulating ICI efficacy, potentially through gut microbiome dysbiosis. However, the impact of PPIs on ICI-based therapies for mRCC remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 427 patients with mRCC classified as intermediate or poor risk according to the IMDC criteria treated with first-line IO-IO (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) or IO-TKI (ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor) therapies. Patients were stratified by PPI use during the 30 days before and including the day of ICI initiation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between PPI users and nonusers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PPI use was significantly associated with shorter OS in patients receiving IO-IO therapy (median OS, 23.34 months vs. not reached; <em>P</em> = .002), but not in those receiving IO-TKI therapy (<em>P</em> = .909). Multivariate analysis confirmed PPIs as an independent prognostic factor for OS in the IO-IO group (HR, 1.647; 95% CI, 1.007-2.693; <em>P</em> = .046). No significant differences in PFS or ORR were observed between PPI users and nonusers in either group, although the complete response rate was notably lower in PPI users treated with IO-IO (1.6% vs. 10.3%; <em>P</em> = .025).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PPI use was associated with inferior survival in mRCC patients receiving IO-IO therapy, potentially through microbiome modulation and other immunologic or clinical mechanisms; however, these findings are based on retrospective data and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Caution is advised when prescribing PPIs to patients undergoing ICI-based therapy, particularly IO-IO regimens, and prospective studies are needed to confirm whether avoiding unnecessary PPI use can improve clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Main Genomic Findings in Penile Cancer: An Update 阴茎癌的主要基因组发现:最新进展
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102493
Herney Andrés García-Perdomo , Scott Tagawa
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare but highly heterogeneous malignancy accounting for over 95% of penile cancers. While it is more prevalent in regions such as South America, parts of Africa, and South Asia, its global rarity has historically limited molecular research. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the detailed genomic and epigenomic characterization of HPV-associated and HPV-independent carcinogenesis, unveiling critical differences between these two processes. These discoveries are reshaping classification, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making in PSCC
阴茎鳞状细胞癌(PSCC)是一种罕见但高度异质性的恶性肿瘤,占阴茎癌的95%以上。虽然它在南美洲、非洲部分地区和南亚等地区更为普遍,但其全球稀缺性历来限制了分子研究。高通量测序的最新进展使得hpv相关和hpv非依赖性致癌的详细基因组和表观基因组特征得以实现,揭示了这两个过程之间的关键差异。这些发现正在重塑PSCC的分类、预后和治疗决策
{"title":"Main Genomic Findings in Penile Cancer: An Update","authors":"Herney Andrés García-Perdomo ,&nbsp;Scott Tagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102493","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102493","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare but highly heterogeneous malignancy accounting for over 95% of penile cancers. While it is more prevalent in regions such as South America, parts of Africa, and South Asia, its global rarity has historically limited molecular research. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the detailed genomic and epigenomic characterization of HPV-associated and HPV-independent carcinogenesis, unveiling critical differences between these two processes. These discoveries are reshaping classification, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making in PSCC</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of PD-L1 and PD-1 Expression With Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma PD-L1和PD-1表达与上尿路上皮癌临床病理特征及预后的关系
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102497
Peng Li , Xiaolei Zhang , Xiao Yang , Hai Li , Guoxin Song , Qiang Lu , Li Pengchao

Introduction

To investigate the expression of PD-L1/PD-1 in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in UTUC.

Patients and Methods

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in 124 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor specimens in UTUC. Clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) were documented. Association between PD-L1, PD1 with clinicopathologic characteristics and OS were evaluated using binary logistic regression or Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at 0.05.

Results

Of 113 eligible patients (11 excluded due to insufficient tissue), 31.9% (36/113) showed PD-L1⁺ tumor cells, and 28.8% (29/101) had PD-L1⁺ TIICs. PD-1⁺ TIICs were observed in 58.4% (59/101). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells correlated significantly with high tumor grade (P = .029). PD-L1⁺ tumor cells predicted reduced OS in univariate (HR = 1.83, P = .025) and multivariable analyses (HR = 2.15, P = .007). PD-1⁺ TIICs associated with early-stage disease (P = .005) but not OS (P = .166). PD-L1⁺ TIICs also showed no OS association (P = .644).

Conclusions

PD-L1 is expressed in 31.9% of UTUC tumors and 28.8% of TIICs, while PD-1 is detected in 58.4% of TIICs. Tumor cell PD-L1 positivity independently predicts poor survival and may drive UTUC progression. PD-1⁺ TIICs correlate with early-stage disease but lack prognostic value for OS. These findings highlight PD-L1 as a potential biomarker for risk stratification in UTUC.
目的探讨PD-L1/PD-1在UTUC肿瘤细胞和肿瘤浸润免疫细胞(TIICs)中的表达及其与临床病理特征和预后的关系。方法采用免疫组化法(IHC)检测124例福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤标本中PD-L1和PD-1的表达。记录临床病理变量和总生存率(OS)。采用二元logistic回归或Cox回归评估PD-L1、PD1与临床病理特征及OS的关系。0.05认为有统计学意义。结果在113例符合条件的患者中(11例因组织不足而被排除),31.9%(36/113)的患者显示PD-L1 +肿瘤细胞,28.8%(29/101)的患者显示PD-L1 + TIICs。PD-1 + TIICs发生率为58.4%(59/101)。PD-L1在肿瘤细胞中的表达与肿瘤分级呈正相关(P = 0.029)。PD-L1 +肿瘤细胞在单变量分析(HR = 1.83, P = 0.025)和多变量分析(HR = 2.15, P = 0.007)中预测OS降低。PD-1 + TIICs与早期疾病相关(P = 0.005),但与OS无关(P = 0.166)。PD-L1 + TIICs也没有OS相关性(P = 0.644)。结论spd - l1在31.9%的UTUC肿瘤和28.8%的TIICs中表达,PD-1在58.4%的TIICs中表达。肿瘤细胞PD-L1阳性独立预测生存不良,并可能驱动UTUC进展。PD-1 + TIICs与早期疾病相关,但对OS缺乏预后价值。这些发现强调了PD-L1作为UTUC风险分层的潜在生物标志物。
{"title":"Association of PD-L1 and PD-1 Expression With Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma","authors":"Peng Li ,&nbsp;Xiaolei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiao Yang ,&nbsp;Hai Li ,&nbsp;Guoxin Song ,&nbsp;Qiang Lu ,&nbsp;Li Pengchao","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102497","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To investigate the expression of PD-L1/PD-1 in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in UTUC.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in 124 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor specimens in UTUC. Clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) were documented. Association between PD-L1, PD1 with clinicopathologic characteristics and OS were evaluated using binary logistic regression or Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 113 eligible patients (11 excluded due to insufficient tissue), 31.9% (36/113) showed PD-L1⁺ tumor cells, and 28.8% (29/101) had PD-L1⁺ TIICs. PD-1⁺ TIICs were observed in 58.4% (59/101). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells correlated significantly with high tumor grade (<em>P</em> = .029). PD-L1⁺ tumor cells predicted reduced OS in univariate (HR = 1.83, <em>P</em> = .025) and multivariable analyses (HR = 2.15, <em>P</em> = .007). PD-1⁺ TIICs associated with early-stage disease (<em>P</em> = .005) but not OS (<em>P</em> = .166). PD-L1⁺ TIICs also showed no OS association (<em>P</em> = .644).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PD-L1 is expressed in 31.9% of UTUC tumors and 28.8% of TIICs, while PD-1 is detected in 58.4% of TIICs. Tumor cell PD-L1 positivity independently predicts poor survival and may drive UTUC progression. PD-1⁺ TIICs correlate with early-stage disease but lack prognostic value for OS. These findings highlight PD-L1 as a potential biomarker for risk stratification in UTUC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146026255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Physician Documentation of Patients’ Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Affect Treatment Decisions in High-Risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer? 医生记录患者前列腺特异性抗原加倍时间是否影响高危生化复发前列腺癌的治疗决策?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102496
Alicia K. Morgans , Maelys Touya , Nader El-Chaar , Dina ElSouda , Lisa Mucha , Krishnan Ramaswamy , Kelechi L. Adejumo , Tammy Schuler , Jason Sharpe , Bruce Feinberg , Parisa Asgarisabet , Prathamesh Pathak , Stephen J. Freedland

Introduction

Nearly half of patients with prostate cancer experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) within 10 years after definitive treatment. Among them, patients with high-risk BCR are those who have a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) of ≤ 9 months, which is one of the strongest predictors of poor outcomes. This study aimed to define characteristics and treatment patterns among patients whose PSADT was documented or undocumented by treating physicians at the time of high-risk BCR diagnosis.

Patients and Methods

Participating physicians from the United States Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network abstracted medical record data of patients with high-risk BCR into electronic case report forms (index: 2018-2020; follow-up through 2022). Physicians reported PSADT values at index using labs, clinical judgment, or online calculation. If not provided, PSADT was retrospectively calculated using PSA data from the case report forms. Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were compared between patients with documented versus undocumented PSADT.

Results

Among 284 patients, PSADT was not documented by treating physicians in 180 patients (63%) at the time of high-risk BCR diagnosis. For the 104 patients (37%) for whom PSADT was documented, physicians often overestimated PSADT compared with retrospective calculations based on validated tools, underestimating progression risk. Notably, patients with documented PSADT had a significantly shorter median time to treatment than those with undocumented PSADT (1.0 vs. 6.7 months; hazard ratio: 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.6-4.4; P < .0001).

Conclusion

Many patients with high-risk BCR may be unidentified in practice despite widespread availability of PSADT calculators to characterize risk. Physicians that document PSADT are more likely to prescribe treatment early, despite underestimating progression risk (ie, overestimating PSADT). Efforts should be made to improve consistent, accurate PSADT calculation and documentation by physicians to inform treatment decision-making for management of high-risk BCR.
近一半的前列腺癌患者在最终治疗后10年内出现生化复发(BCR)。其中,高危BCR患者是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)倍增时间(PSADT)≤9个月的患者,这是预后不良的最强预测因子之一。本研究旨在确定高风险BCR诊断时主治医生记录或未记录PSADT的患者的特征和治疗模式。来自美国红衣主教健康肿瘤学提供者扩展网络的参与医生将高风险BCR患者的病历数据提取为电子病例报告表格(索引:2018-2020;随访至2022年)。医生报告PSADT值在指数使用实验室,临床判断,或在线计算。如果没有提供,则使用病例报告表格中的PSA数据回顾性计算PSA。基线特征和治疗模式在有记录和无记录的PSADT患者之间进行比较。结果在284例患者中,180例(63%)患者在高风险BCR诊断时未记录PSADT。对于记录PSADT的104例患者(37%),与基于有效工具的回顾性计算相比,医生往往高估了PSADT,低估了进展风险。值得注意的是,记录在案的PSADT患者的中位治疗时间明显短于未记录在案的PSADT患者(1.0个月vs. 6.7个月;风险比:3.4;95%置信区间:2.6-4.4;P < 0.0001)。结论尽管广泛使用PSADT计算器来描述风险,但许多高危BCR患者在实践中可能无法识别。尽管低估了进展风险(即高估了PSADT),但记录PSADT的医生更有可能在早期开出治疗处方。应努力提高医师一致、准确的PSADT计算和记录,以便为高风险BCR的治疗决策提供信息。
{"title":"Does Physician Documentation of Patients’ Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Affect Treatment Decisions in High-Risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer?","authors":"Alicia K. Morgans ,&nbsp;Maelys Touya ,&nbsp;Nader El-Chaar ,&nbsp;Dina ElSouda ,&nbsp;Lisa Mucha ,&nbsp;Krishnan Ramaswamy ,&nbsp;Kelechi L. Adejumo ,&nbsp;Tammy Schuler ,&nbsp;Jason Sharpe ,&nbsp;Bruce Feinberg ,&nbsp;Parisa Asgarisabet ,&nbsp;Prathamesh Pathak ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Freedland","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102496","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Nearly half of patients with prostate cancer experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) within 10 years after definitive treatment. Among them, patients with high-risk BCR are those who have a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) of ≤ 9 months, which is one of the strongest predictors of poor outcomes. This study aimed to define characteristics and treatment patterns among patients whose PSADT was documented or undocumented by treating physicians at the time of high-risk BCR diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Participating physicians from the United States Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network abstracted medical record data of patients with high-risk BCR into electronic case report forms (index: 2018-2020; follow-up through 2022). Physicians reported PSADT values at index using labs, clinical judgment, or online calculation. If not provided, PSADT was retrospectively calculated using PSA data from the case report forms. Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were compared between patients with documented versus undocumented PSADT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 284 patients, PSADT was not documented by treating physicians in 180 patients (63%) at the time of high-risk BCR diagnosis. For the 104 patients (37%) for whom PSADT was documented, physicians often overestimated PSADT compared with retrospective calculations based on validated tools, underestimating progression risk. Notably, patients with documented PSADT had a significantly shorter median time to treatment than those with undocumented PSADT (1.0 vs. 6.7 months; hazard ratio: 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.6-4.4; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Many patients with high-risk BCR may be unidentified in practice despite widespread availability of PSADT calculators to characterize risk. Physicians that document PSADT are more likely to prescribe treatment early, despite underestimating progression risk (ie, overestimating PSADT). Efforts should be made to improve consistent, accurate PSADT calculation and documentation by physicians to inform treatment decision-making for management of high-risk BCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Signet Ring and Non-Signet Ring Urachal Adenocarcinomas: A National Cancer Database Study 印戒与非印戒尿管腺癌的比较分析:一项国家癌症数据库研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102495
Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Rohan Garje, Murugesan Manoharan

Introduction

Primary urachal adenocarcinomas are rare and histologically diverse. Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), a poorly cohesive and aggressive variant, is associated with poor prognosis compared to non-signet ring urachal adenocarcinoma (UA). This study aims to compare the clinicopathologic features, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes between SRCC and UA.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020), including patients aged ≥ 18 with SRCC or non-signet ring UA located at the bladder dome. Demographics, staging, treatment modalities, and overall survival (OS) were compared using chi-square tests and Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Among 550 patients, 60 had SRCC and 490 had non-signet ring UA. Baseline characteristics were comparable, though SRCC cases showed more frequent under-staging and treatment at community centers. Median OS was significantly shorter for SRCC (29.6 vs. 79.0 months, P < .001). Partial cystectomy conferred better survival than radical cystectomy in both groups. Chemotherapy did not improve outcomes in SRCC and was associated with worse survival in UA, likely due to selection bias.

Conclusion

SRCC of the urachus is a biologically distinct subtype with significantly worse outcomes than non-signet ring UA, regardless of surgical approach. Histology-specific strategies are needed to improve survival in this rare, aggressive cancer.
摘要原发性尿管腺癌罕见且组织学多样。与非印戒尿管腺癌(UA)相比,印戒细胞癌(SRCC)是一种低凝聚力和侵袭性的变异,预后较差。本研究旨在比较SRCC和UA的临床病理特征、治疗模式和生存结果。方法回顾性分析来自国家癌症数据库(2004-2020)的数据,包括年龄≥18岁的SRCC或位于膀胱穹窿的非印戒UA患者。统计学、分期、治疗方式和总生存期(OS)采用卡方检验和Kaplan-Meier分析进行比较。结果550例患者中,60例为SRCC, 490例为非印戒UA。基线特征具有可比性,尽管SRCC病例在社区中心表现出更频繁的分期不足和治疗。SRCC的中位生存期显著缩短(29.6个月vs. 79.0个月,P < 001)。在两组患者中,部分膀胱切除术比根治性膀胱切除术生存率更高。化疗并没有改善SRCC患者的预后,而且与UA患者更差的生存率相关,这可能是由于选择偏倚。结论无论何种手术入路,urachus的srcc是一种生物学上独特的亚型,其预后明显差于非印戒UA。为了提高这种罕见的侵袭性癌症的生存率,需要组织学特异性的策略。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Signet Ring and Non-Signet Ring Urachal Adenocarcinomas: A National Cancer Database Study","authors":"Deerush Kannan Sakthivel,&nbsp;Pushan Prabhakar,&nbsp;Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub,&nbsp;Rohan Garje,&nbsp;Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102495","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102495","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Primary urachal adenocarcinomas are rare and histologically diverse. Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), a poorly cohesive and aggressive variant, is associated with poor prognosis compared to non-signet ring urachal adenocarcinoma (UA). This study aims to compare the clinicopathologic features, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes between SRCC and UA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020), including patients aged ≥ 18 with SRCC or non-signet ring UA located at the bladder dome. Demographics, staging, treatment modalities, and overall survival (OS) were compared using chi-square tests and Kaplan–Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 550 patients, 60 had SRCC and 490 had non-signet ring UA. Baseline characteristics were comparable, though SRCC cases showed more frequent under-staging and treatment at community centers. Median OS was significantly shorter for SRCC (29.6 vs. 79.0 months, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Partial cystectomy conferred better survival than radical cystectomy in both groups. Chemotherapy did not improve outcomes in SRCC and was associated with worse survival in UA, likely due to selection bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SRCC of the urachus is a biologically distinct subtype with significantly worse outcomes than non-signet ring UA, regardless of surgical approach. Histology-specific strategies are needed to improve survival in this rare, aggressive cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Low-Volume Primary Tumors – A National Cancer Database Analysis on Metastasis Profile and Survival Outcomes 转移性前列腺癌伴小体积原发肿瘤-国家癌症数据库分析转移概况和生存结果
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102494
Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub , Pushan Prabhakar , Deerush Kannan Sakthivel , Aditi Chandrasekaran , Rohan Garje , Murugesan Manoharan

Introduction

A tumor confined within the prostate gland is termed localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastasis could rarely develop in such low-volume primary tumors. The nature of these metastatic prostate cancers with low-volume primary tumors is largely underexplored. The objective of our study was to analyze the baseline characteristics, metastatic patterns, and survival outcomes of this condition from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods

Data from patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors between 2004 and 2021 were analyzed for patient characteristics, metastatic trends, variations by histopathology type, and survival outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify various factors associated with this condition. Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 1,613,004 individuals diagnosed with clinically localized PCa were analyzed. Among them, 45,010 patients had distant metastasis. The most common site of metastasis was bone, followed by lung, liver, and brain. The most common histopathology type was adenocarcinoma (94.3%). The median overall survival (OS) of metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors was 37.13 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 36.57-37.68) months. The best OS in single-site metastasis was seen in lung metastasis (median OS: 54.34 [95% CI, 42.10-66.58] months), and the worst was seen in liver metastasis (median OS: 18.17 [95% CI, 12.70-23.63] months). Adenocarcinoma had a better prognosis (median OS: 38.51 [95% CI, 37.91-39.10] months) than non-adenocarcinoma (median OS: 17.58 [95% CI, 16.40-18.75] months). All results had a P-value less than .001.

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis reveals that metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors is relatively uncommon (2.8% of ≤ T2 disease), with bone being the most common metastatic site. Isolated metastasis in the lungs and adenocarcinoma had better OS among the metastasis sites and histopathology type, respectively.
局限于前列腺内的肿瘤称为局限性前列腺癌(PCa)。然而,这种小体积原发肿瘤很少发生转移。这些转移性前列腺癌伴小体积原发肿瘤的性质在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究的目的是分析来自国家癌症数据库(NCDB)的基线特征、转移模式和生存结果。方法分析2004年至2021年间诊断为转移性前列腺癌伴小体积原发肿瘤患者的患者特征、转移趋势、组织病理学类型变化和生存结果。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与这种情况相关的各种因素。使用Kaplan-Meier分析评估生存结果。结果共分析了1613,004例临床诊断为局限性PCa的患者。其中远处转移45010例。最常见的转移部位是骨,其次是肺、肝和脑。最常见的组织病理类型为腺癌(94.3%)。转移性前列腺癌合并小体积原发肿瘤的中位总生存期(OS)为37.13个月(95%置信区间(CI), 36.57-37.68个月)。单部位转移中生存期最好的是肺转移(中位生存期:54.34 [95% CI, 42.10 ~ 66.58]个月),最差的是肝转移(中位生存期:18.17 [95% CI, 12.70 ~ 23.63]个月)。腺癌的预后(中位OS: 38.51 [95% CI, 37.91-39.10]个月)优于非腺癌(中位OS: 17.58 [95% CI, 16.40-18.75]个月)。所有结果的p值均小于0.001。结论转移性前列腺癌合并小体积原发肿瘤相对少见(≤T2疾病的2.8%),骨是最常见的转移部位。肺和腺癌的分离性转移在转移部位和组织病理类型上分别具有较好的OS。
{"title":"Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Low-Volume Primary Tumors – A National Cancer Database Analysis on Metastasis Profile and Survival Outcomes","authors":"Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub ,&nbsp;Pushan Prabhakar ,&nbsp;Deerush Kannan Sakthivel ,&nbsp;Aditi Chandrasekaran ,&nbsp;Rohan Garje ,&nbsp;Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102494","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102494","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>A tumor confined within the prostate gland is termed localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastasis could rarely develop in such low-volume primary tumors. The nature of these metastatic prostate cancers with low-volume primary tumors is largely underexplored. The objective of our study was to analyze the baseline characteristics, metastatic patterns, and survival outcomes of this condition from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors between 2004 and 2021 were analyzed for patient characteristics, metastatic trends, variations by histopathology type, and survival outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify various factors associated with this condition. Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,613,004 individuals diagnosed with clinically localized PCa were analyzed. Among them, 45,010 patients had distant metastasis. The most common site of metastasis was bone, followed by lung, liver, and brain. The most common histopathology type was adenocarcinoma (94.3%). The median overall survival (OS) of metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors was 37.13 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 36.57-37.68) months. The best OS in single-site metastasis was seen in lung metastasis (median OS: 54.34 [95% CI, 42.10-66.58] months), and the worst was seen in liver metastasis (median OS: 18.17 [95% CI, 12.70-23.63] months). Adenocarcinoma had a better prognosis (median OS: 38.51 [95% CI, 37.91-39.10] months) than non-adenocarcinoma (median OS: 17.58 [95% CI, 16.40-18.75] months). All results had a <em>P</em>-value less than .001.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This comprehensive analysis reveals that metastatic prostate cancer with low-volume primary tumors is relatively uncommon (2.8% of ≤ T2 disease), with bone being the most common metastatic site. Isolated metastasis in the lungs and adenocarcinoma had better OS among the metastasis sites and histopathology type, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146026254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integral Approach in the Follow-up of Prostate Cancer Patients: SOGUG Multidisciplinary Expert Panel Insights 综合方法在前列腺癌患者的随访:SOGUG多学科专家小组的见解
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102489
María José Méndez-Vidal , Enrique Gallardo , Alfonso Gómez de Iturriaga , Fernando López Campos , Claudio Martínez Ballesteros , Julia Ruiz Vozmediano , Aránzazu González-del-Alba , Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men in the majority of countries globally and although most cases follow an indolent course, the disease is heterogeneous with some patients exhibiting an aggressive clinical course with progression and metastasis. Castration-resistant metastatic disease has an overall poor prognosis with most patients dying within 2 years of diagnosis. The diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring strategies of patients with PCa have experienced remarkable improvements due to advances in genetic biomarkers, novel imaging techniques, androgen receptor (AR) signaling targeting agents, next-generation chemotherapeutic drugs, bone-seeking agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. All these new therapeutic options are added to standard radiation therapy and radical surgical procedures. However, the treatment outcomes of PCa can be improved by understanding the current therapeutic options and their appropriate sequencing use. Hence, a panel of experts summarized the current challenges in optimizing management, monitoring patients and assessing treatment response across different risk groups and tumor stages. Treatment-decision making in the framework of multidisciplinary teams, better understanding of the patient journey, and identification of unmet needs for improving quality of life are essential considerations in the managing patients in the real-world setting.
前列腺癌(PCa)是全球大多数国家男性中最常见的恶性肿瘤,尽管大多数病例的病程为无痛,但这种疾病具有异质性,一些患者表现出侵袭性的临床病程,并伴有进展和转移。去势抵抗性转移性疾病总体预后较差,大多数患者在诊断后2年内死亡。由于遗传生物标志物、新型成像技术、雄激素受体(AR)信号靶向药物、下一代化疗药物、寻骨药物、聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂和治疗性放射性药物的进步,PCa患者的诊断、治疗和监测策略得到了显著改善。所有这些新的治疗选择都被添加到标准放射治疗和根治性外科手术中。然而,通过了解当前的治疗方案及其适当的测序使用,可以改善PCa的治疗结果。因此,一个专家小组总结了目前在优化管理、监测患者和评估不同风险群体和肿瘤分期的治疗反应方面面临的挑战。在多学科团队的框架下进行治疗决策,更好地了解患者的旅程,并确定未满足的改善生活质量的需求是在现实世界中管理患者的基本考虑因素。
{"title":"Integral Approach in the Follow-up of Prostate Cancer Patients: SOGUG Multidisciplinary Expert Panel Insights","authors":"María José Méndez-Vidal ,&nbsp;Enrique Gallardo ,&nbsp;Alfonso Gómez de Iturriaga ,&nbsp;Fernando López Campos ,&nbsp;Claudio Martínez Ballesteros ,&nbsp;Julia Ruiz Vozmediano ,&nbsp;Aránzazu González-del-Alba ,&nbsp;Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102489","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102489","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men in the majority of countries globally and although most cases follow an indolent course, the disease is heterogeneous with some patients exhibiting an aggressive clinical course with progression and metastasis. Castration-resistant metastatic disease has an overall poor prognosis with most patients dying within 2 years of diagnosis. The diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring strategies of patients with PCa have experienced remarkable improvements due to advances in genetic biomarkers, novel imaging techniques, androgen receptor (AR) signaling targeting agents, next-generation chemotherapeutic drugs, bone-seeking agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. All these new therapeutic options are added to standard radiation therapy and radical surgical procedures. However, the treatment outcomes of PCa can be improved by understanding the current therapeutic options and their appropriate sequencing use. Hence, a panel of experts summarized the current challenges in optimizing management, monitoring patients and assessing treatment response across different risk groups and tumor stages. Treatment-decision making in the framework of multidisciplinary teams, better understanding of the patient journey, and identification of unmet needs for improving quality of life are essential considerations in the managing patients in the real-world setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the Oncologic Outcomes of Cryoablation, Laser Ablation, and Hyperthermia for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using the SEER Database 冷冻消融、激光消融和热疗治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤预后比较:使用SEER数据库的基于人群的队列研究
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102490
Run-Qi Guo, Jie Sun, Zhi-Xin Bie, Yuan-Ming Li

Objective

Ablative therapies, including cryoablation (CA), laser ablation (LA), and hyperthermia (HT), are increasingly used for localized prostate cancer, but large-scale comparative evidence on their long-term oncologic outcomes is scarce. This study aimed to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) among patients treated with these modalities.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2019), we identified patients with localized prostate cancer treated with CA, LA, or HT between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio was performed to balance baseline characteristics. OS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and competing risk analysis was performed to assess cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM).

Results

After PSM, 712 patients per group were compared between CA and LA. No significant difference was observed in CSS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.94-2.66; P = .083) or OS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI, 0.88-1.35; P = .481). The median follow-up was 64 months, with 18 and 23 cancer-specific deaths in the CA and LA groups, respectively. In comparisons involving HT (n = 107 per group post-PSM), no statistically significant differences in survival were detected against CA or LA. However, these HT-related findings must be interpreted with extreme caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the HT category, the small sample size, and resulting low statistical power.

Conclusion

In this large population-based study, CA and LA demonstrated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes for localized prostate cancer. While no survival differences were detected for HT, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn for this modality due to major methodological limitations. Further prospective, well-designed randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings and provide more robust evidence.
目的:消融治疗,包括冷冻消融(CA),激光消融(LA)和热疗(HT),越来越多地用于局限性前列腺癌,但关于其长期肿瘤预后的大规模比较证据很少。本研究旨在比较接受这些治疗方式的患者的癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)。方法:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2000-2019),我们确定了2010年至2019年期间接受CA、LA或HT治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者。以1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计OS和CSS,并进行竞争风险分析以评估癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)和其他原因死亡率(OCM)。结果:PSM后,CA组与LA组比较,每组712例。CSS(风险比[HR] = 1.58, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.94-2.66; P = 0.083)和OS(风险比[HR] = 1.09, 95% CI, 0.88-1.35; P = 0.481)无显著差异。中位随访时间为64个月,CA组和LA组分别有18例和23例癌症特异性死亡。在涉及HT的比较中(psm后每组n = 107), CA或LA的生存率没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,这些与高温相关的发现必须非常谨慎地解释,因为高温类别的显著异质性,小样本量,以及由此产生的低统计效力。结论:在这项以人群为基础的大型研究中,CA和LA对局限性前列腺癌的长期肿瘤学结果具有可比性。虽然没有检测到HT的生存差异,但由于主要的方法学限制,无法得出明确的结论。进一步的前瞻性、精心设计的随机对照试验对于验证这些发现和提供更有力的证据至关重要。
{"title":"Comparison of the Oncologic Outcomes of Cryoablation, Laser Ablation, and Hyperthermia for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using the SEER Database","authors":"Run-Qi Guo,&nbsp;Jie Sun,&nbsp;Zhi-Xin Bie,&nbsp;Yuan-Ming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102490","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102490","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ablative therapies, including cryoablation (CA), laser ablation (LA), and hyperthermia (HT), are increasingly used for localized prostate cancer, but large-scale comparative evidence on their long-term oncologic outcomes is scarce. This study aimed to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) among patients treated with these modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2019), we identified patients with localized prostate cancer treated with CA, LA, or HT between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio was performed to balance baseline characteristics. OS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and competing risk analysis was performed to assess cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After PSM, 712 patients per group were compared between CA and LA. No significant difference was observed in CSS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.94-2.66; <em>P</em> = .083) or OS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI, 0.88-1.35; <em>P</em> = .481). The median follow-up was 64 months, with 18 and 23 cancer-specific deaths in the CA and LA groups, respectively. In comparisons involving HT (<em>n</em> = 107 per group post-PSM), no statistically significant differences in survival were detected against CA or LA. However, these HT-related findings must be interpreted with extreme caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the HT category, the small sample size, and resulting low statistical power.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large population-based study, CA and LA demonstrated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes for localized prostate cancer. While no survival differences were detected for HT, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn for this modality due to major methodological limitations. Further prospective, well-designed randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings and provide more robust evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 102490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145954285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are Urologists and/or Radiation Oncologists Biased when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery versus Radiation in Consultations for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer? 泌尿科医生和/或放射肿瘤科医生在报告早期前列腺癌手术与放射治疗的利弊时是否存在偏见?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102486
Nadine A. Friedrich , Michael Luu , Rebecca Gale , Antwon Chaplin , Reva Polineni , Alex Shiang , Dong Shin , Stephen J. Freedland , Brennan Spiegel , Leslie K. Ballas , Paul Kokorowski , Timothy J. Daskivich

Background

Treatment choice for early-stage prostate cancer (PC) is strongly influenced by the counseling physician's specialty. Whether a physician’s specialty biases how treatment advantages and disadvantages are presented in consultations is unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed content discussed by urologists and radiation oncologists when comparing radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in PC consultations.

Methods

Consultations of 39 men with nonmetastatic PC across 6 urologists and radiation oncologists were recorded and transcribed. Analysts thematically characterized statements comparing advantages and disadvantages of surgery versus radiation (and vice versa) using an open coding approach. Frequency of thematic content by specialty was reported at a consultation level. Themes exceeding 10% and differing by ≥ 25% between specialties were reported.

Results

Our dataset included 1171 statements from 28 Urology and 11 Radiation Oncology consults. Major themes discussed included side effects (90%), cancer control (84%), convenience (56%), salvage options (48%) and invasiveness (43%). Differences in content between specialties were observed for all themes except convenience. For side effects, radiation oncologists (vs. urologists) more often noted that radiation has better urinary (55% vs. 0%) and erectile side effects than surgery (37% vs. 0%). For salvage therapy, urologists more often mentioned inability to get radiation twice (32% vs. 0%) and difficulties with salvage prostatectomy (36% vs. 0%). For cancer control, urologists more often noted long-term data on surgery outcomes as an advantage of surgery (25% vs. 0%). For invasiveness, radiation oncologists more often described radiation as less invasive (36% vs. 11%).

Conclusions

While specialists acknowledge obvious limitations of their treatments, they selectively highlight advantages of their procedures and the disadvantages of competing treatments.
背景:早期前列腺癌(PC)的治疗选择受到咨询医师专业的强烈影响。医生的专业是否偏向于治疗的优势和劣势在会诊中如何呈现尚不清楚。为了研究这一点,我们分析了泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤学家在前列腺癌会诊时比较根治性前列腺切除术和放射治疗时讨论的内容。方法对6名泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤科医生诊治的39例非转移性PC患者进行记录和转录。分析人员使用开放编码方法对比较手术与放疗的优缺点(反之亦然)的陈述进行主题化描述。在协商一级报告了按专业分列的专题内容的频率。报告的主题超过10%,不同专业之间差异≥25%。结果我们的数据集包括来自28名泌尿外科和11名放射肿瘤学咨询者的1171份陈述。讨论的主要主题包括副作用(90%)、癌症控制(84%)、便利性(56%)、挽救方案(48%)和侵袭性(43%)。除便利性外,所有主题的专业内容均存在差异。对于副作用,放射肿瘤学家(相对于泌尿科医生)更常注意到放射治疗的泌尿系统(55%对0%)和勃起副作用比手术(37%对0%)要好。对于补救性治疗,泌尿科医生更多地提到无法接受两次放射治疗(32%对0%)和补救性前列腺切除术的困难(36%对0%)。对于癌症控制,泌尿科医生更常将手术结果的长期数据作为手术的优势(25%对0%)。对于侵入性,放射肿瘤学家更常将放射描述为侵入性较小(36%对11%)。虽然专家们承认他们的治疗方法有明显的局限性,但他们有选择地强调他们的治疗方法的优点和其他治疗方法的缺点。
{"title":"Are Urologists and/or Radiation Oncologists Biased when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery versus Radiation in Consultations for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer?","authors":"Nadine A. Friedrich ,&nbsp;Michael Luu ,&nbsp;Rebecca Gale ,&nbsp;Antwon Chaplin ,&nbsp;Reva Polineni ,&nbsp;Alex Shiang ,&nbsp;Dong Shin ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Freedland ,&nbsp;Brennan Spiegel ,&nbsp;Leslie K. Ballas ,&nbsp;Paul Kokorowski ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Daskivich","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment choice for early-stage prostate cancer (PC) is strongly influenced by the counseling physician's specialty. Whether a physician’s specialty biases how treatment advantages and disadvantages are presented in consultations is unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed content discussed by urologists and radiation oncologists when comparing radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in PC consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consultations of 39 men with nonmetastatic PC across 6 urologists and radiation oncologists were recorded and transcribed. Analysts thematically characterized statements comparing advantages and disadvantages of surgery versus radiation (and vice versa) using an open coding approach. Frequency of thematic content by specialty was reported at a consultation level. Themes exceeding 10% and differing by ≥ 25% between specialties were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our dataset included 1171 statements from 28 Urology and 11 Radiation Oncology consults. Major themes discussed included side effects (90%), cancer control (84%), convenience (56%), salvage options (48%) and invasiveness (43%). Differences in content between specialties were observed for all themes except convenience. For side effects, radiation oncologists (vs. urologists) more often noted that radiation has better urinary (55% vs. 0%) and erectile side effects than surgery (37% vs. 0%). For salvage therapy, urologists more often mentioned inability to get radiation twice (32% vs. 0%) and difficulties with salvage prostatectomy (36% vs. 0%). For cancer control, urologists more often noted long-term data on surgery outcomes as an advantage of surgery (25% vs. 0%). For invasiveness, radiation oncologists more often described radiation as less invasive (36% vs. 11%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While specialists acknowledge obvious limitations of their treatments, they selectively highlight advantages of their procedures and the disadvantages of competing treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 102486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Real-World Outcomes 局部晚期前列腺癌的术后治疗和生存:现实世界的结果。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102480
Anne Holck Storås , Kaitlyn M Tsuruda , Tor Åge Myklebust , Erik S Haug , Sophie D Fosså , Bettina Kulle Andreassen

Objective

To evaluate real-world postoperative treatment patterns and survival outcomes among men with nonmetastatic locally advanced prostate cancer (laPCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) to improve the shared decision-making process.

Material and Methods

All 3022 patients diagnosed with laPCa prostate cancer and registered in Cancer registry of Norway (CRN) who underwent RP within 1 year after diagnosis during 2008-21 were included. Data on disease characteristic’s and radiotherapy were derived from the CRN and data on endocrine treatment and additional systemic therapy (docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide) were provided from the Norwegian Prescription Database and the Norwegian Patient Registry. Cause-specific mortality was estimated using a competing risk framework. Overall survival was calculated as 1 minus the all-cause mortality. The cumulative probability of starting postoperative treatment for relapse was also calculated.

Results

Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Within 10 years post-RP, 34% received postoperative radiotherapy, 19% received endocrine therapy as first treatment, and 14% received additional systemic therapy. Higher PSA, cT3b stage, and ISUP grade 4 to 5 were associated with increased likelihood of postoperative treatment. The 10-year overall mortality was 16%, with most deaths from non-prostate cancer causes. Patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy had low 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (2%), whereas those starting endocrine therapy first experienced higher prostate cancer mortality (31%). Among patients progressing to systemic therapy, 5-year mortality was 65%, predominantly due to prostate cancer.

Conclusion

In this large, unselected national cohort, laPCa patients treated with RP had generally favorable long-term survival, but more than half required relapse-directed therapy within 10 years. Relapse risk was strongly linked to baseline tumor characteristics and persisted throughout follow-up, underscoring the need for prolonged surveillance. Future studies should address long-term functional outcomes and quality-of-life after multimodal postoperative treatment.
目的:评估接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的非转移性局部晚期前列腺癌(laPCa)患者的术后治疗模式和生存结果,以改善共同决策过程。材料和方法:所有在挪威癌症登记处(cancer registry of Norway, CRN)登记的诊断为laPCa前列腺癌并在诊断后1年内接受RP的3022例患者在2008-21年间被纳入研究。关于疾病特征和放疗的数据来自CRN,关于内分泌治疗和其他全身治疗(多西他赛、阿比特龙、恩杂鲁胺)的数据来自挪威处方数据库和挪威患者登记处。使用竞争风险框架估计病因特异性死亡率。总生存期计算为1减去全因死亡率。计算术后开始治疗复发的累积概率。结果:中位随访时间为4.8年。rp术后10年内,34%接受术后放疗,19%首次接受内分泌治疗,14%接受额外的全身治疗。较高的PSA、cT3b分期和ISUP 4 - 5级与术后治疗的可能性增加相关。10年的总死亡率为16%,其中大多数死于非前列腺癌。接受术后放疗的患者10年前列腺癌特异性死亡率较低(2%),而首先开始内分泌治疗的患者前列腺癌死亡率较高(31%)。在进行全身治疗的患者中,5年死亡率为65%,主要是由于前列腺癌。结论:在这个庞大的,未选择的国家队列中,接受RP治疗的laPCa患者通常具有良好的长期生存,但超过一半的患者需要在10年内接受复发定向治疗。复发风险与基线肿瘤特征密切相关,并在随访期间持续存在,强调了长期监测的必要性。未来的研究应该关注多模式术后治疗后的长期功能结果和生活质量。
{"title":"Postoperative Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Real-World Outcomes","authors":"Anne Holck Storås ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn M Tsuruda ,&nbsp;Tor Åge Myklebust ,&nbsp;Erik S Haug ,&nbsp;Sophie D Fosså ,&nbsp;Bettina Kulle Andreassen","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102480","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102480","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate real-world postoperative treatment patterns and survival outcomes among men with nonmetastatic locally advanced prostate cancer (laPCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) to improve the shared decision-making process.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>All 3022 patients diagnosed with laPCa prostate cancer and registered in Cancer registry of Norway (CRN) who underwent RP within 1 year after diagnosis during 2008-21 were included. Data on disease characteristic’s and radiotherapy were derived from the CRN and data on endocrine treatment and additional systemic therapy (docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide) were provided from the Norwegian Prescription Database and the Norwegian Patient Registry. Cause-specific mortality was estimated using a competing risk framework. Overall survival was calculated as 1 minus the all-cause mortality. The cumulative probability of starting postoperative treatment for relapse was also calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Within 10 years post-RP, 34% received postoperative radiotherapy, 19% received endocrine therapy as first treatment, and 14% received additional systemic therapy. Higher PSA, cT3b stage, and ISUP grade 4 to 5 were associated with increased likelihood of postoperative treatment. The 10-year overall mortality was 16%, with most deaths from non-prostate cancer causes. Patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy had low 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (2%), whereas those starting endocrine therapy first experienced higher prostate cancer mortality (31%). Among patients progressing to systemic therapy, 5-year mortality was 65%, predominantly due to prostate cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large, unselected national cohort, laPCa patients treated with RP had generally favorable long-term survival, but more than half required relapse-directed therapy within 10 years. Relapse risk was strongly linked to baseline tumor characteristics and persisted throughout follow-up, underscoring the need for prolonged surveillance. Future studies should address long-term functional outcomes and quality-of-life after multimodal postoperative treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 102480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145949523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1