检验商业周期理论:大衰退的证据

Bo Li
{"title":"检验商业周期理论:大衰退的证据","authors":"Bo Li","doi":"arxiv-2403.04104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical business cycle studies using cross-country data usually cannot\nachieve causal relationships while within-country studies mostly focus on the\nbust period. We provide the first causal investigation into the boom period of\nthe 1999-2010 U.S. cross-metropolitan business cycle. Using a novel research\ndesign, we show that credit expansion in private-label mortgages causes a\ndifferentially stronger boom (2000-2006) and bust (2007-2010) cycle in the\nhouse-related industries in the high net-export-growth areas. Most importantly,\nour unique research design enables us to perform the most comprehensive tests\non theories (hypotheses) regarding the business cycle. We show that the\nfollowing theories (hypotheses) cannot explain the cause of the 1999-2010 U.S.\nbusiness cycle: the speculative euphoria hypothesis, the real business cycle\ntheory, the collateral-driven credit cycle theory, the business uncertainty\ntheory, and the extrapolative expectation theory.","PeriodicalId":501372,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Business Cycle Theories: Evidence from the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"Bo Li\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2403.04104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical business cycle studies using cross-country data usually cannot\\nachieve causal relationships while within-country studies mostly focus on the\\nbust period. We provide the first causal investigation into the boom period of\\nthe 1999-2010 U.S. cross-metropolitan business cycle. Using a novel research\\ndesign, we show that credit expansion in private-label mortgages causes a\\ndifferentially stronger boom (2000-2006) and bust (2007-2010) cycle in the\\nhouse-related industries in the high net-export-growth areas. Most importantly,\\nour unique research design enables us to perform the most comprehensive tests\\non theories (hypotheses) regarding the business cycle. We show that the\\nfollowing theories (hypotheses) cannot explain the cause of the 1999-2010 U.S.\\nbusiness cycle: the speculative euphoria hypothesis, the real business cycle\\ntheory, the collateral-driven credit cycle theory, the business uncertainty\\ntheory, and the extrapolative expectation theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.04104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.04104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用跨国数据进行的商业周期实证研究通常无法建立因果关系,而国内研究大多集中于繁荣期。我们首次对 1999-2010 年美国跨大都市商业周期的繁荣期进行了因果调查。通过新颖的研究设计,我们发现私人标签抵押贷款的信贷扩张导致了高净出口增长地区与住房相关行业的繁荣(2000-2006 年)和萧条(2007-2010 年)周期的不同程度加强。最重要的是,我们独特的研究设计使我们能够对有关商业周期的理论(假设)进行最全面的检验。我们的研究表明,以下理论(假说)无法解释 1999-2010 年美国商业周期的原因:投机兴奋假说、实体商业周期理论、抵押品驱动信贷周期理论、商业不确定性理论和外推预期理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing Business Cycle Theories: Evidence from the Great Recession
Empirical business cycle studies using cross-country data usually cannot achieve causal relationships while within-country studies mostly focus on the bust period. We provide the first causal investigation into the boom period of the 1999-2010 U.S. cross-metropolitan business cycle. Using a novel research design, we show that credit expansion in private-label mortgages causes a differentially stronger boom (2000-2006) and bust (2007-2010) cycle in the house-related industries in the high net-export-growth areas. Most importantly, our unique research design enables us to perform the most comprehensive tests on theories (hypotheses) regarding the business cycle. We show that the following theories (hypotheses) cannot explain the cause of the 1999-2010 U.S. business cycle: the speculative euphoria hypothesis, the real business cycle theory, the collateral-driven credit cycle theory, the business uncertainty theory, and the extrapolative expectation theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Asymmetry Index: The View of Market Analysts Market Failures of Carbon Trading Hydrogen Development in China and the EU: A Recommended Tian Ji's Horse Racing Strategy Applying the Nash Bargaining Solution for a Reasonable Royalty II Auction theory and demography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1