SARS-CoV-2阳性供体肝移植后的单中心结果:增加利用率的论据

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001590
Ashton A. Connor, Max W. Adelman, Constance M. Mobley, Mozhgon Moaddab, Alexandra J. Erhardt, David E. Hsu, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Mansi Sanghvi, Yee Lee Cheah, Caroline J Simon, M. Hobeika, Ashish S. Saharia, David W. Victor, S. Kodali, Tamneet Basra, E. Graviss, D. Nguyen, Ahmed Elsaiey, Linda W. Moore, M. Nigo, Ashley L. Drews, Kevin A. Grimes, Cesar A. Arias, Xian C. Li, A. Gaber, R. M. Ghobrial
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2阳性供体肝移植后的单中心结果:增加利用率的论据","authors":"Ashton A. Connor, Max W. Adelman, Constance M. Mobley, Mozhgon Moaddab, Alexandra J. Erhardt, David E. Hsu, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Mansi Sanghvi, Yee Lee Cheah, Caroline J Simon, M. Hobeika, Ashish S. Saharia, David W. Victor, S. Kodali, Tamneet Basra, E. Graviss, D. Nguyen, Ahmed Elsaiey, Linda W. Moore, M. Nigo, Ashley L. Drews, Kevin A. Grimes, Cesar A. Arias, Xian C. Li, A. Gaber, R. M. Ghobrial","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in SARS-CoV-2–test positive potential organ donors. The benefits of life-saving liver transplantation (LT) must be balanced against the potential risk of donor-derived viral transmission. Although emerging evidence suggests that the use of COVID-19–positive donor organs may be safe, granular series thoroughly evaluating safety are still needed. Results of 29 consecutive LTs from COVID-19–positive donors at a single center are presented here. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between April 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Differences between recipients of COVID-19–positive (n = 29 total; 25 index, 4 redo) and COVID-19–negative (n = 472 total; 454 index, 18 redo) deceased donor liver grafts were compared. Results. COVID-19–positive donors were significantly younger (P = 0.04) and had lower kidney donor profile indices (P = 0.04) than COVID-19–negative donors. Recipients of COVID-19–positive donor grafts were older (P = 0.04) but otherwise similar to recipients of negative donors. Donor SARS-CoV-2 infection status was not associated with a overall survival of recipients (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-5.04; P = 0.89). There were 3 deaths among recipients of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors. No death seemed virally mediated because there was no qualitative association with peri-LT antispike antibody titers, post-LT prophylaxis, or SARS-CoV-2 variants. Conclusions. The utilization of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors was not associated with a decreased overall survival of recipients. There was no suggestion of viral transmission from donor to recipient. The results from this large single-center study suggest that COVID-19–positive donors may be used safely to expand the deceased donor pool.","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-center Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With SARS-CoV-2–Positive Donors: An Argument for Increased Utilization\",\"authors\":\"Ashton A. Connor, Max W. Adelman, Constance M. Mobley, Mozhgon Moaddab, Alexandra J. Erhardt, David E. Hsu, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Mansi Sanghvi, Yee Lee Cheah, Caroline J Simon, M. Hobeika, Ashish S. Saharia, David W. Victor, S. Kodali, Tamneet Basra, E. Graviss, D. Nguyen, Ahmed Elsaiey, Linda W. Moore, M. Nigo, Ashley L. Drews, Kevin A. Grimes, Cesar A. Arias, Xian C. Li, A. Gaber, R. M. Ghobrial\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in SARS-CoV-2–test positive potential organ donors. The benefits of life-saving liver transplantation (LT) must be balanced against the potential risk of donor-derived viral transmission. Although emerging evidence suggests that the use of COVID-19–positive donor organs may be safe, granular series thoroughly evaluating safety are still needed. Results of 29 consecutive LTs from COVID-19–positive donors at a single center are presented here. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between April 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Differences between recipients of COVID-19–positive (n = 29 total; 25 index, 4 redo) and COVID-19–negative (n = 472 total; 454 index, 18 redo) deceased donor liver grafts were compared. Results. COVID-19–positive donors were significantly younger (P = 0.04) and had lower kidney donor profile indices (P = 0.04) than COVID-19–negative donors. Recipients of COVID-19–positive donor grafts were older (P = 0.04) but otherwise similar to recipients of negative donors. Donor SARS-CoV-2 infection status was not associated with a overall survival of recipients (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-5.04; P = 0.89). There were 3 deaths among recipients of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors. No death seemed virally mediated because there was no qualitative association with peri-LT antispike antibody titers, post-LT prophylaxis, or SARS-CoV-2 variants. Conclusions. The utilization of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors was not associated with a decreased overall survival of recipients. There was no suggestion of viral transmission from donor to recipient. The results from this large single-center study suggest that COVID-19–positive donors may be used safely to expand the deceased donor pool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。COVID-19 大流行导致 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的潜在器官捐献者增加。肝移植(LT)救命的益处必须与供体病毒传播的潜在风险相平衡。尽管新出现的证据表明使用 COVID-19 阳性的供体器官可能是安全的,但仍需要对安全性进行全面评估。本文介绍了一个中心连续 29 例 COVID-19 阳性供体 LT 的结果。方法。对 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间的 LT 受体进行了回顾性队列研究。比较了 COVID-19 阳性(n = 29 例;25 例指数,4 例重做)和 COVID-19 阴性(n = 472 例;454 例指数,18 例重做)死亡供体肝脏移植物受者之间的差异。结果与 COVID-19 阴性供体相比,COVID-19 阳性供体明显更年轻(P = 0.04),肾脏供体特征指数更低(P = 0.04)。COVID-19 阳性供体移植物的受体年龄较大(P = 0.04),但在其他方面与阴性供体的受体相似。供体 SARS-CoV-2 感染状况与受体的总体存活率无关(危险比为 1.11;95% 置信区间为 0.24-5.04;P = 0.89)。COVID-19阳性供体的肝脏移植受者中有3人死亡。没有死亡病例似乎是病毒介导的,因为这与肝移植前抗梭状芽孢杆菌抗体滴度、肝移植后预防措施或 SARS-CoV-2 变体没有定性联系。结论使用 COVID-19 阳性供体的肝脏移植物与受体总存活率下降无关。没有迹象表明供体之间存在病毒传播。这项大型单中心研究的结果表明,COVID-19 阳性供体可以安全地用于扩大死亡供体库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-center Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With SARS-CoV-2–Positive Donors: An Argument for Increased Utilization
Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in SARS-CoV-2–test positive potential organ donors. The benefits of life-saving liver transplantation (LT) must be balanced against the potential risk of donor-derived viral transmission. Although emerging evidence suggests that the use of COVID-19–positive donor organs may be safe, granular series thoroughly evaluating safety are still needed. Results of 29 consecutive LTs from COVID-19–positive donors at a single center are presented here. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between April 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Differences between recipients of COVID-19–positive (n = 29 total; 25 index, 4 redo) and COVID-19–negative (n = 472 total; 454 index, 18 redo) deceased donor liver grafts were compared. Results. COVID-19–positive donors were significantly younger (P = 0.04) and had lower kidney donor profile indices (P = 0.04) than COVID-19–negative donors. Recipients of COVID-19–positive donor grafts were older (P = 0.04) but otherwise similar to recipients of negative donors. Donor SARS-CoV-2 infection status was not associated with a overall survival of recipients (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-5.04; P = 0.89). There were 3 deaths among recipients of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors. No death seemed virally mediated because there was no qualitative association with peri-LT antispike antibody titers, post-LT prophylaxis, or SARS-CoV-2 variants. Conclusions. The utilization of liver grafts from COVID-19–positive donors was not associated with a decreased overall survival of recipients. There was no suggestion of viral transmission from donor to recipient. The results from this large single-center study suggest that COVID-19–positive donors may be used safely to expand the deceased donor pool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond 75: Graft Allocation and Organ Utility Implications in Liver Transplantation. Clinical Translation and Implementation of a Bioartificial Pancreas Therapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Type 1 Diabetes. Making Living-donor Liver Transplantation a Viable Option for Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension. Outcomes of Older Primary Kidney Transplant Recipients by Induction Agent and High-risk Viral Discordance Status in the United States. Molecular Signature Associated With Acute Rejection in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1