{"title":"道德引用的不可能性","authors":"Sarah Imhoff","doi":"10.1177/00084298241235397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece responds to the articles of Castor, Hovland, Halvorson, and Pérez in this issue. It notes their moments of resonance and disagreement, and it ultimately concludes that the reason why we can have no consistent and thoroughgoing ethics of citation is because it is a practice that is embedded in an academic ecosystem with unequal foundations.","PeriodicalId":514407,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","volume":"82 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impossibility of ethical citation\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Imhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084298241235397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This piece responds to the articles of Castor, Hovland, Halvorson, and Pérez in this issue. It notes their moments of resonance and disagreement, and it ultimately concludes that the reason why we can have no consistent and thoroughgoing ethics of citation is because it is a practice that is embedded in an academic ecosystem with unequal foundations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses\",\"volume\":\"82 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241235397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241235397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This piece responds to the articles of Castor, Hovland, Halvorson, and Pérez in this issue. It notes their moments of resonance and disagreement, and it ultimately concludes that the reason why we can have no consistent and thoroughgoing ethics of citation is because it is a practice that is embedded in an academic ecosystem with unequal foundations.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
