社论:女权主义经济批判

Anne Engelhardt, Jakob Graf, Dorothea Schmidt, Sandra Sieron, Jenny Simon
{"title":"社论:女权主义经济批判","authors":"Anne Engelhardt, Jakob Graf, Dorothea Schmidt, Sandra Sieron, Jenny Simon","doi":"10.32387/prokla.v54i214.2094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist debates on the connection between patriarchy and capitalism have significantly shifted in recent years. Ten years ago we diagnosed the contradiction that, on the one hand, feminist and anti-feminist struggles and debates were intensifying, but at the same time the social theory tools used to analyse them were predominantly characterised by more culturalist or post-structuralist approaches and liberal feminisms. At the time, we criticised that the connection between gender and the capitalist mode of production was often overlooked. Today, the situation is different. It was not only in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic that it became clear that the critical social inequality in the distribution of reproductive and care work must be understood as an integral part of social crisis dynamics. In this context, PROKLA 214 aims to contribute to clarifying the understanding and critique of economics within feminist thought.","PeriodicalId":158793,"journal":{"name":"PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft","volume":"41 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Feminist Economic Critique\",\"authors\":\"Anne Engelhardt, Jakob Graf, Dorothea Schmidt, Sandra Sieron, Jenny Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.32387/prokla.v54i214.2094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feminist debates on the connection between patriarchy and capitalism have significantly shifted in recent years. Ten years ago we diagnosed the contradiction that, on the one hand, feminist and anti-feminist struggles and debates were intensifying, but at the same time the social theory tools used to analyse them were predominantly characterised by more culturalist or post-structuralist approaches and liberal feminisms. At the time, we criticised that the connection between gender and the capitalist mode of production was often overlooked. Today, the situation is different. It was not only in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic that it became clear that the critical social inequality in the distribution of reproductive and care work must be understood as an integral part of social crisis dynamics. In this context, PROKLA 214 aims to contribute to clarifying the understanding and critique of economics within feminist thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"41 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v54i214.2094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v54i214.2094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,女权主义关于父权制与资本主义之间关系的辩论发生了显著变化。十年前,我们发现了这样一个矛盾:一方面,女权主义和反女权主义的斗争和辩论愈演愈烈,但与此同时,用于分析这些斗争和辩论的社会理论工具却以文化主义或后结构主义方法和自由女权主义为主。当时,我们批评性别与资本主义生产方式之间的联系往往被忽视。如今,情况有所不同。不仅是在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,人们才清楚地认识到,必须将生育和护理工作分配中的严重社会不平等理解为社会危机动态的一个组成部分。在这种情况下,《PROKLA 214》旨在为澄清女权主义思想中对经济学的理解和批判做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: Feminist Economic Critique
Feminist debates on the connection between patriarchy and capitalism have significantly shifted in recent years. Ten years ago we diagnosed the contradiction that, on the one hand, feminist and anti-feminist struggles and debates were intensifying, but at the same time the social theory tools used to analyse them were predominantly characterised by more culturalist or post-structuralist approaches and liberal feminisms. At the time, we criticised that the connection between gender and the capitalist mode of production was often overlooked. Today, the situation is different. It was not only in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic that it became clear that the critical social inequality in the distribution of reproductive and care work must be understood as an integral part of social crisis dynamics. In this context, PROKLA 214 aims to contribute to clarifying the understanding and critique of economics within feminist thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turbulenzen in der Flugindustrie soziale Reproduktion im Süden Soziale Reproduktion jenseits des Produktivitätsfunktionalismus Zum Widerspruch zwischen Akkumulation und der Reproduktion von Leben Globale (Re-)Produktionsnetzwerke aus feministischer Labour-Geography-Perspektive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1