Nazanin Khajoueinejad , Sayed Imtiaz , Yael Berger , Deepti Mahajan , Demetrius Durham , Noah A. Cohen , Daniel M. Labow , Umut Sarpel , Benjamin J. Golas , Hideo Takahashi , Camilo Correa-Gallego , Ganesh Gunasekaran , Spiros P. Hiotis
{"title":"内部(T2)胃癌临床分期的准确性:前期手术切除后的生存结果与新辅助治疗过度治疗风险的比较","authors":"Nazanin Khajoueinejad , Sayed Imtiaz , Yael Berger , Deepti Mahajan , Demetrius Durham , Noah A. Cohen , Daniel M. Labow , Umut Sarpel , Benjamin J. Golas , Hideo Takahashi , Camilo Correa-Gallego , Ganesh Gunasekaran , Spiros P. Hiotis","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Currently, patients with T1 gastric cancers undergo upfront resection while those with loco-regional disease often are recommended for systemic therapy. Over-staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), specifically in T2 disease, introduces the risk of overtreatment with chemotherapy without the benefit of a confirmed pathological stage. This risk of overtreatment compared to the risk of recurrence after upfront surgery must be weighed in this group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection between 2010–2020 at our institution. Patients were excluded if they received preoperative systemic therapy or radiation. EUS clinical staging and pathological staging were reconciled for accuracy. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival was calculated for the T2 intramural group. Survival was confirmed by chart review and utilization of the Social Security Death Index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>134 patients were included. EUS over-staged 20/37 (54%) of patients defined as having clinical T2 (cT2). Lymph node involvement (cN+) as determined by EUS without biopsy was accurate in 1/9 (11%) when compared to final pathology. In total, 22 cases were confirmed as intramural disease (T2) on final pathology. Six patients with T2 disease (18%) experienced recurrence. With a median follow-up of 32 months, no patients experienced mortality at five years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical staging by EUS introduces the risk of over-staging for patients with T2 gastric cancer. Upfront surgery for these individuals demonstrated encouraging recurrence-free and overall survival. Patients with cT2 gastric cancers should be selectively evaluated for benefits of upfront resection, given risk of over-treated without a survival benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>Clinical over-staging with endoscopic ultrasound introduces the risk of overtreatment with systemic chemotherapy especially in patients with T2 disease. In this retrospective review, we report the accuracy of EUS in patients with pT2 gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection as well as the recurrence and survival outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000471/pdfft?md5=c01e59191343883a547bf2e805856497&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000471-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of clinical staging for intramural (T2) gastric cancer: Survival outcomes following upfront surgical resection compared to risk of overtreatment with neoadjuvant therapy\",\"authors\":\"Nazanin Khajoueinejad , Sayed Imtiaz , Yael Berger , Deepti Mahajan , Demetrius Durham , Noah A. Cohen , Daniel M. Labow , Umut Sarpel , Benjamin J. Golas , Hideo Takahashi , Camilo Correa-Gallego , Ganesh Gunasekaran , Spiros P. Hiotis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Currently, patients with T1 gastric cancers undergo upfront resection while those with loco-regional disease often are recommended for systemic therapy. Over-staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), specifically in T2 disease, introduces the risk of overtreatment with chemotherapy without the benefit of a confirmed pathological stage. This risk of overtreatment compared to the risk of recurrence after upfront surgery must be weighed in this group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection between 2010–2020 at our institution. Patients were excluded if they received preoperative systemic therapy or radiation. EUS clinical staging and pathological staging were reconciled for accuracy. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival was calculated for the T2 intramural group. Survival was confirmed by chart review and utilization of the Social Security Death Index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>134 patients were included. EUS over-staged 20/37 (54%) of patients defined as having clinical T2 (cT2). Lymph node involvement (cN+) as determined by EUS without biopsy was accurate in 1/9 (11%) when compared to final pathology. In total, 22 cases were confirmed as intramural disease (T2) on final pathology. Six patients with T2 disease (18%) experienced recurrence. With a median follow-up of 32 months, no patients experienced mortality at five years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical staging by EUS introduces the risk of over-staging for patients with T2 gastric cancer. Upfront surgery for these individuals demonstrated encouraging recurrence-free and overall survival. Patients with cT2 gastric cancers should be selectively evaluated for benefits of upfront resection, given risk of over-treated without a survival benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>Clinical over-staging with endoscopic ultrasound introduces the risk of overtreatment with systemic chemotherapy especially in patients with T2 disease. In this retrospective review, we report the accuracy of EUS in patients with pT2 gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection as well as the recurrence and survival outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000471/pdfft?md5=c01e59191343883a547bf2e805856497&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000471-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景目前,T1 期胃癌患者接受前期切除术,而有局部区域性疾病的患者通常被建议接受全身治疗。通过内镜超声(EUS)进行过度分期,特别是对 T2 疾病,会带来化疗过度治疗的风险,而病理分期确认却不会带来好处。我们回顾性分析了 2010-2020 年间在我院接受前期切除术的胃癌患者。如果患者在术前接受了全身治疗或放射治疗,则排除在外。对 EUS 临床分期和病理分期进行核对,以确保准确性。计算T2室内组的无复发生存率和总生存率。通过病历审查和利用社会保障死亡指数确认生存率。在被定义为临床 T2(cT2)的患者中,20/37(54%)的患者进行了 EUS 过度分期。与最终病理结果相比,1/9(11%)的患者在未经活检的情况下通过 EUS 确定淋巴结受累(cN+)。共有 22 例患者在最终病理检查中被确诊为壁内疾病(T2)。6例T2患者(18%)复发。结论通过 EUS 进行临床分期会给 T2 胃癌患者带来过度分期的风险。通过 EUS 进行临床分期会给 T2 期胃癌患者带来过度分期的风险,对这些患者进行前期手术可获得令人鼓舞的无复发生存率和总生存率。考虑到过度治疗而无生存获益的风险,应对 cT2 胃癌患者进行选择性评估,以确定前期切除术的获益。在这篇回顾性文章中,我们报告了对接受前期切除术的 pT2 胃癌患者进行 EUS 分期的准确性以及复发和生存结果。
Accuracy of clinical staging for intramural (T2) gastric cancer: Survival outcomes following upfront surgical resection compared to risk of overtreatment with neoadjuvant therapy
Background
Currently, patients with T1 gastric cancers undergo upfront resection while those with loco-regional disease often are recommended for systemic therapy. Over-staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), specifically in T2 disease, introduces the risk of overtreatment with chemotherapy without the benefit of a confirmed pathological stage. This risk of overtreatment compared to the risk of recurrence after upfront surgery must be weighed in this group.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients with gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection between 2010–2020 at our institution. Patients were excluded if they received preoperative systemic therapy or radiation. EUS clinical staging and pathological staging were reconciled for accuracy. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival was calculated for the T2 intramural group. Survival was confirmed by chart review and utilization of the Social Security Death Index.
Results
134 patients were included. EUS over-staged 20/37 (54%) of patients defined as having clinical T2 (cT2). Lymph node involvement (cN+) as determined by EUS without biopsy was accurate in 1/9 (11%) when compared to final pathology. In total, 22 cases were confirmed as intramural disease (T2) on final pathology. Six patients with T2 disease (18%) experienced recurrence. With a median follow-up of 32 months, no patients experienced mortality at five years.
Conclusions
Clinical staging by EUS introduces the risk of over-staging for patients with T2 gastric cancer. Upfront surgery for these individuals demonstrated encouraging recurrence-free and overall survival. Patients with cT2 gastric cancers should be selectively evaluated for benefits of upfront resection, given risk of over-treated without a survival benefit.
Synopsis
Clinical over-staging with endoscopic ultrasound introduces the risk of overtreatment with systemic chemotherapy especially in patients with T2 disease. In this retrospective review, we report the accuracy of EUS in patients with pT2 gastric cancer who underwent upfront resection as well as the recurrence and survival outcomes.