数字化临床跟踪工具在本科护理教育中的使用和感知

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.009
Zahra Shajani EdD, RN , Catherine M. Laing PhD, RN , Amanda O'Rae MPH, RN , Justin Burkett MN, RN, CHSE , Kaleigh Peters BNSc, RN
{"title":"数字化临床跟踪工具在本科护理教育中的使用和感知","authors":"Zahra Shajani EdD, RN ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Laing PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Amanda O'Rae MPH, RN ,&nbsp;Justin Burkett MN, RN, CHSE ,&nbsp;Kaleigh Peters BNSc, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evaluating undergraduate nursing students’ clinical performance is a complex practice that relies on outdated methods that do not align with the growing use of technology in nursing curricula. This study is an exploration of nursing students’ and clinical instructors’ experiences using a digital evaluation tool or traditional paper-based evaluation tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Third year nursing students and clinical instructors were given the opportunity to use a digital or paper-based evaluation tool during one semester; a survey was sent to all participants at the end of the semester.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Student survey responses indicated that they preferred the digital evaluation tool as it provided for timely and specific in self-reflection and instructor feedback that was easily accessible.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A digital evaluation tool is effective in supporting nursing students in the clinical evaluation process through encouraging reflection on specific learning behaviors, timely feedback from instructors, and an overall improvement in their clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374/pdfft?md5=0e4ab161d9afc9c98adbe8ab4f0c5a44&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000374-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and perception of a digital clinical tracking tool in undergraduate nursing education\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Shajani EdD, RN ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Laing PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Amanda O'Rae MPH, RN ,&nbsp;Justin Burkett MN, RN, CHSE ,&nbsp;Kaleigh Peters BNSc, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evaluating undergraduate nursing students’ clinical performance is a complex practice that relies on outdated methods that do not align with the growing use of technology in nursing curricula. This study is an exploration of nursing students’ and clinical instructors’ experiences using a digital evaluation tool or traditional paper-based evaluation tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Third year nursing students and clinical instructors were given the opportunity to use a digital or paper-based evaluation tool during one semester; a survey was sent to all participants at the end of the semester.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Student survey responses indicated that they preferred the digital evaluation tool as it provided for timely and specific in self-reflection and instructor feedback that was easily accessible.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A digital evaluation tool is effective in supporting nursing students in the clinical evaluation process through encouraging reflection on specific learning behaviors, timely feedback from instructors, and an overall improvement in their clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374/pdfft?md5=0e4ab161d9afc9c98adbe8ab4f0c5a44&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000374-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言评估本科护生的临床表现是一项复杂的实践,它依赖于过时的方法,与护理课程中日益增长的技术应用不符。本研究探讨了护理专业学生和临床带教老师使用数字评估工具或传统纸质评估工具的经验。方法在一个学期中,三年级护理专业学生和临床带教老师有机会使用数字或纸质评估工具;学期结束时,向所有参与者发送调查问卷。结果学生的调查反馈显示,他们更喜欢数字评估工具,因为它能提供及时、具体的自我反思和指导教师的反馈,而且很容易获取。 讨论数字评估工具通过鼓励学生反思具体的学习行为、指导教师的及时反馈以及临床实践的整体改进,在临床评估过程中为护理专业学生提供了有效的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization and perception of a digital clinical tracking tool in undergraduate nursing education

Introduction

Evaluating undergraduate nursing students’ clinical performance is a complex practice that relies on outdated methods that do not align with the growing use of technology in nursing curricula. This study is an exploration of nursing students’ and clinical instructors’ experiences using a digital evaluation tool or traditional paper-based evaluation tool.

Methods

Third year nursing students and clinical instructors were given the opportunity to use a digital or paper-based evaluation tool during one semester; a survey was sent to all participants at the end of the semester.

Results

Student survey responses indicated that they preferred the digital evaluation tool as it provided for timely and specific in self-reflection and instructor feedback that was easily accessible.

Discussion

A digital evaluation tool is effective in supporting nursing students in the clinical evaluation process through encouraging reflection on specific learning behaviors, timely feedback from instructors, and an overall improvement in their clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1