幸福生活、有意义的生活和丰富心理生活的认知复杂性

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104475
Shigehiro Oishi , Erin Westgate , Youngjae Cha
{"title":"幸福生活、有意义的生活和丰富心理生活的认知复杂性","authors":"Shigehiro Oishi ,&nbsp;Erin Westgate ,&nbsp;Youngjae Cha","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Is a psychologically rich life a more cognitively complex one? In two studies, we explored whether individual differences in happiness, meaning in life, and psychological richness would be differentially associated with information processing styles such as attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 436), we found that psychological richness was associated with greater attributional complexity, holism, and less essentialism, whereas happiness was associated with less attributional complexity. Meaning was also associated with attributional complexity but unrelated to holism and essentialism. In Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 516), a pre-registered replication, we again found that psychological richness was associated with more attributional complexity and holism, and marginally less essentialism. In contrast, happiness and meaning were unrelated to attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. Across two studies, then, psychological richness was consistently associated with more attributional complexity and holism, whereas happiness and meaning were not. The key findings remained largely the same after controlling for all the Big Five personality traits and demographic variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 104475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cognitive complexity of a happy life, a meaningful life, and a psychologically rich life\",\"authors\":\"Shigehiro Oishi ,&nbsp;Erin Westgate ,&nbsp;Youngjae Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Is a psychologically rich life a more cognitively complex one? In two studies, we explored whether individual differences in happiness, meaning in life, and psychological richness would be differentially associated with information processing styles such as attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 436), we found that psychological richness was associated with greater attributional complexity, holism, and less essentialism, whereas happiness was associated with less attributional complexity. Meaning was also associated with attributional complexity but unrelated to holism and essentialism. In Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 516), a pre-registered replication, we again found that psychological richness was associated with more attributional complexity and holism, and marginally less essentialism. In contrast, happiness and meaning were unrelated to attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. Across two studies, then, psychological richness was consistently associated with more attributional complexity and holism, whereas happiness and meaning were not. The key findings remained largely the same after controlling for all the Big Five personality traits and demographic variables.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理丰富的人生是否在认知上更加复杂?在两项研究中,我们探讨了幸福感、人生意义和心理丰富度的个体差异是否与归因复杂性、整体主义和本质主义等信息处理风格有不同的关联。在研究 1(N = 436)中,我们发现心理丰富度与较高的归因复杂性、整体主义和较低的本质主义相关,而幸福感则与较低的归因复杂性相关。意义也与归因复杂性有关,但与整体主义和本质主义无关。在研究 2(N = 516)中,我们再次发现,心理丰富度与更多的归因复杂性和整体主义相关,而与较少的本质主义相关。相反,幸福感和意义与归因复杂性、整体主义和本质主义无关。因此,在两项研究中,心理丰富性始终与更多的归因复杂性和整体主义相关,而幸福感和意义则无关。在控制了所有五大人格特质和人口统计学变量后,主要研究结果基本保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cognitive complexity of a happy life, a meaningful life, and a psychologically rich life

Is a psychologically rich life a more cognitively complex one? In two studies, we explored whether individual differences in happiness, meaning in life, and psychological richness would be differentially associated with information processing styles such as attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. In Study 1 (N = 436), we found that psychological richness was associated with greater attributional complexity, holism, and less essentialism, whereas happiness was associated with less attributional complexity. Meaning was also associated with attributional complexity but unrelated to holism and essentialism. In Study 2 (N = 516), a pre-registered replication, we again found that psychological richness was associated with more attributional complexity and holism, and marginally less essentialism. In contrast, happiness and meaning were unrelated to attributional complexity, holism, and essentialism. Across two studies, then, psychological richness was consistently associated with more attributional complexity and holism, whereas happiness and meaning were not. The key findings remained largely the same after controlling for all the Big Five personality traits and demographic variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Why does Creativity Foster Well-Being? Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness during Everyday Creative Activities Comparability of personality facets between men and women: A test of measurement invariance in IPIP-NEO facets in 49 countries The dynamic relationship between state extraversion and the subjectively perceived situational sociality in continuous time “High empathic response but low interest”: Machiavellianism and its neurostructural basis relate to perceived risk of social exclusion and workplace deviance Incremental relations between self-understanding and social functioning beyond personality traits in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1