{"title":"重复阅读对特殊学习障碍成人阅读流畅性的影响","authors":"Madeline Halkowski, Richard M. Kubina","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00926-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study implemented an alternating-treatments design with Standard Celeration Charting. The applied experiment occurred via telecommunication and assessed the effectiveness of repeated reading (RR) on reading fluency for two adults with specific learning disabilities using high-level and low-level reading passages. Participants reread each passage until they met a predetermined fluency criterion. We measured participants reading fluency using correct words per 1 min (CWPM) and assessed for retention at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. Both participants reached their fluency aims and maintained their progress postintervention.</p><p>• RR can improve reading fluency for children and adults with reading deficits.</p><p>• RR practice sessions require minutes to implement, which offers great flexibility for scheduling.</p><p>• Telecommunication represents an effective modality for implementing RR procedures for adults with reading disabilities.</p><p>• Participants in the study retained their fluency gains post-intervention, supporting that time spent on RR may represent a good investment for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Adults with Specific Learning Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Halkowski, Richard M. Kubina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00926-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study implemented an alternating-treatments design with Standard Celeration Charting. The applied experiment occurred via telecommunication and assessed the effectiveness of repeated reading (RR) on reading fluency for two adults with specific learning disabilities using high-level and low-level reading passages. Participants reread each passage until they met a predetermined fluency criterion. We measured participants reading fluency using correct words per 1 min (CWPM) and assessed for retention at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. Both participants reached their fluency aims and maintained their progress postintervention.</p><p>• RR can improve reading fluency for children and adults with reading deficits.</p><p>• RR practice sessions require minutes to implement, which offers great flexibility for scheduling.</p><p>• Telecommunication represents an effective modality for implementing RR procedures for adults with reading disabilities.</p><p>• Participants in the study retained their fluency gains post-intervention, supporting that time spent on RR may represent a good investment for clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00926-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00926-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Adults with Specific Learning Disabilities
The current study implemented an alternating-treatments design with Standard Celeration Charting. The applied experiment occurred via telecommunication and assessed the effectiveness of repeated reading (RR) on reading fluency for two adults with specific learning disabilities using high-level and low-level reading passages. Participants reread each passage until they met a predetermined fluency criterion. We measured participants reading fluency using correct words per 1 min (CWPM) and assessed for retention at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. Both participants reached their fluency aims and maintained their progress postintervention.
• RR can improve reading fluency for children and adults with reading deficits.
• RR practice sessions require minutes to implement, which offers great flexibility for scheduling.
• Telecommunication represents an effective modality for implementing RR procedures for adults with reading disabilities.
• Participants in the study retained their fluency gains post-intervention, supporting that time spent on RR may represent a good investment for clinicians.
期刊介绍：
Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
