利用深度学习重建的低 keV 虚拟单能双能量 CT 评估肝细胞癌

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s40846-024-00855-x
Takashi Ota, Atsushi Nakamoto, Hiromitsu Onishi, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Shohei Matsumoto, Hideyuki Fukui, Koki Kaketaka, Toru Honda, Kengo Kiso, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Noriyuki Tomiyama
{"title":"利用深度学习重建的低 keV 虚拟单能双能量 CT 评估肝细胞癌","authors":"Takashi Ota, Atsushi Nakamoto, Hiromitsu Onishi, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Shohei Matsumoto, Hideyuki Fukui, Koki Kaketaka, Toru Honda, Kengo Kiso, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Noriyuki Tomiyama","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00855-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) using dual-energy CT (DECT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with HCC undergoing DECT scans between February 2019 and March 2022. VMI was reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) at 70-keV (HIR70keV) and 40-keV (HIR40keV) and DLIR at 40-keV (DLIR40keV). Two radiologists calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the HCC. The possible presence of HCC was assessed by two additional radiologists. CNR was compared using Friedman’s test. Diagnostic performance was compared between three groups using Cochran’s Q test and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirty-two patients (mean age 73.19 ± 11.86, 23 males) with 36 HCCs were enrolled. The CNR of DLIR40keV was significantly higher than HIR70keV and HIR40keV (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and 0.001). The sensitivities for the detection of HCC were HIR70keV, 63.9%; HIR40keV, 72.2%; DLIR40 keV, 83.3%, and HIR70keV, 52.8%; HIR40keV, 61.1%; DLIR40 keV, 77.8% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. DLIR40keV sensitivity was significantly higher than HIR70keV on both readers (<i>p</i> = 0.020 and 0.013). The figures of merit (FOM) were HIR70keV, 0.86; HIR40keV, 0.92; DLIR40 keV, 0.96, and HIR70keV, 0.84; HIR40keV, 0.90; and DLIR40 keV, 0.94 for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For both observers, DLIR40keV FOM was significantly higher than HIR70keV (<i>p</i> = 0.013 and 0.012).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>DLIR40keV achieved the best CNR among the three groups. HCC detectability was significantly improved at DLIR40keV compared to HIR70keV.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"283 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-KeV Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT with Deep Learning Reconstruction for Assessing Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Ota, Atsushi Nakamoto, Hiromitsu Onishi, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Shohei Matsumoto, Hideyuki Fukui, Koki Kaketaka, Toru Honda, Kengo Kiso, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Noriyuki Tomiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40846-024-00855-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) using dual-energy CT (DECT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with HCC undergoing DECT scans between February 2019 and March 2022. VMI was reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) at 70-keV (HIR70keV) and 40-keV (HIR40keV) and DLIR at 40-keV (DLIR40keV). Two radiologists calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the HCC. The possible presence of HCC was assessed by two additional radiologists. CNR was compared using Friedman’s test. Diagnostic performance was compared between three groups using Cochran’s Q test and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Thirty-two patients (mean age 73.19 ± 11.86, 23 males) with 36 HCCs were enrolled. The CNR of DLIR40keV was significantly higher than HIR70keV and HIR40keV (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and 0.001). The sensitivities for the detection of HCC were HIR70keV, 63.9%; HIR40keV, 72.2%; DLIR40 keV, 83.3%, and HIR70keV, 52.8%; HIR40keV, 61.1%; DLIR40 keV, 77.8% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. DLIR40keV sensitivity was significantly higher than HIR70keV on both readers (<i>p</i> = 0.020 and 0.013). The figures of merit (FOM) were HIR70keV, 0.86; HIR40keV, 0.92; DLIR40 keV, 0.96, and HIR70keV, 0.84; HIR40keV, 0.90; and DLIR40 keV, 0.94 for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For both observers, DLIR40keV FOM was significantly higher than HIR70keV (<i>p</i> = 0.013 and 0.012).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>DLIR40keV achieved the best CNR among the three groups. HCC detectability was significantly improved at DLIR40keV compared to HIR70keV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00855-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00855-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估使用深度学习图像重建(DLIR)的双能 CT(DECT)低keV 虚拟单能成像(VMI)在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的诊断性能。方法这项回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 2 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受 DECT 扫描的 HCC 患者。使用混合迭代重建(HIR)在 70-keV (HIR70keV) 和 40-keV (HIR40keV) 下重建 VMI,使用 DLIR 在 40-keV (DLIR40keV) 下重建 VMI。两名放射科医生计算 HCC 的对比度-噪声比 (CNR)。另外两名放射科医生对可能存在的 HCC 进行评估。采用弗里德曼检验比较 CNR。结果32名患者(平均年龄73.19±11.86岁,23名男性)共检出36个HCC。DLIR40keV 的 CNR 明显高于 HIR70keV 和 HIR40keV(p < 0.001 和 0.001)。观察者 1 和观察者 2 检测 HCC 的灵敏度分别为:HIR70keV,63.9%;HIR40keV,72.2%;DLIR40 keV,83.3%;HIR70keV,52.8%;HIR40keV,61.1%;DLIR40 keV,77.8%。两个读数器的 DLIR40keV 灵敏度都明显高于 HIR70keV(p = 0.020 和 0.013)。观察者 1 和观察者 2 的优点值(FOM)分别为:HIR70keV,0.86;HIR40keV,0.92;DLIR40 keV,0.96;HIR70keV,0.84;HIR40keV,0.90;DLIR40 keV,0.94。结论在三组观察者中,DLIR40keV 的 CNR 最佳。与 HIR70keV 相比,DLIR40keV 的 HCC 检出率明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-KeV Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT with Deep Learning Reconstruction for Assessing Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) using dual-energy CT (DECT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with HCC undergoing DECT scans between February 2019 and March 2022. VMI was reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) at 70-keV (HIR70keV) and 40-keV (HIR40keV) and DLIR at 40-keV (DLIR40keV). Two radiologists calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the HCC. The possible presence of HCC was assessed by two additional radiologists. CNR was compared using Friedman’s test. Diagnostic performance was compared between three groups using Cochran’s Q test and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results

Thirty-two patients (mean age 73.19 ± 11.86, 23 males) with 36 HCCs were enrolled. The CNR of DLIR40keV was significantly higher than HIR70keV and HIR40keV (p < 0.001 and 0.001). The sensitivities for the detection of HCC were HIR70keV, 63.9%; HIR40keV, 72.2%; DLIR40 keV, 83.3%, and HIR70keV, 52.8%; HIR40keV, 61.1%; DLIR40 keV, 77.8% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. DLIR40keV sensitivity was significantly higher than HIR70keV on both readers (p = 0.020 and 0.013). The figures of merit (FOM) were HIR70keV, 0.86; HIR40keV, 0.92; DLIR40 keV, 0.96, and HIR70keV, 0.84; HIR40keV, 0.90; and DLIR40 keV, 0.94 for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For both observers, DLIR40keV FOM was significantly higher than HIR70keV (p = 0.013 and 0.012).

Conclusion

DLIR40keV achieved the best CNR among the three groups. HCC detectability was significantly improved at DLIR40keV compared to HIR70keV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Different Stages of Post-Traumatic Elbow Joint Capsule Healing on Pronation Movement Attribute and Malignancy Analysis of Lung Nodule on Chest CT with Cause-and-Effect Logic Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis Enhancing Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis: LSTM-based Deep Learning Approach Integrating Echocardiographic Wall Motion Analysis Investigation of Image Quality for Cuboid and Tapered Array microPET Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1