健康成年人服用西洛他唑/瑞舒伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂与同时服用单独成分的药代动力学和安全性比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1390
Jae Hoon Kim, Jang Hee Hong, Jin-Gyu Jung, Won Tae Jung, Kyu-Yeol Nam, Jae Seok Roh, Youn Woong Choi, Junbae Bang, Hyunwook Huh, Hye J. Lee, JungHa Moon, Jaehee Kim, Jung Sunwoo
{"title":"健康成年人服用西洛他唑/瑞舒伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂与同时服用单独成分的药代动力学和安全性比较。","authors":"Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung,&nbsp;Won Tae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Jae Seok Roh,&nbsp;Youn Woong Choi,&nbsp;Junbae Bang,&nbsp;Hyunwook Huh,&nbsp;Hye J. Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;Jaehee Kim,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUC<sub>last</sub>/C<sub>max</sub>). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"13 8","pages":"842-851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Cilostazol/Rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) Versus Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components in Healthy Adults\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung,&nbsp;Won Tae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Jae Seok Roh,&nbsp;Youn Woong Choi,&nbsp;Junbae Bang,&nbsp;Hyunwook Huh,&nbsp;Hye J. Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;Jaehee Kim,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUC<sub>last</sub>/C<sub>max</sub>). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"842-851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西洛他唑和洛伐他汀联合疗法常用于冠心病治疗。这项开放标签、3 × 3交叉临床试验评估了西洛他唑/罗伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)与在空腹和进食条件下同时服用单独成分(SCs)的药代动力学和安全性。在 48 名参加研究的健康成年人中,有 38 人完成了研究。在试验的每个阶段,参与者口服一次西洛他唑/罗伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克),在空腹状态下服用 FDC 或 SCs,或在进食状态下服用 FDC。在服药后 48 小时内采集血样,并使用有效的液相色谱-串联质谱法分析血浆浓度。西洛他唑和罗伐他汀从零时到最后可定量浓度的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUClast)和最大血浆浓度(Cmax)的 FDC 与 SC 的几何平均比分别为 0.94/1.05 和 1.06/1.15 (AUClast /Cmax )。与空腹时相比,进食状态下服用西洛他唑的AUClast和Cmax分别增加了约72%和160%,而服用罗伐他汀的AUClast和Cmax则分别降低了约39%和43%。总之,FDC 与 SCs 具有生物等效性,但在进食状态下的药代动力学存在显著差异。两种治疗方法之间没有观察到明显的安全性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Cilostazol/Rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) Versus Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components in Healthy Adults

The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUClast/Cmax). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUClast and Cmax for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
期刊最新文献
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Neonatal Fc Receptor Inhibitor Rozanolixizumab: An Ethnic Sensitivity Study in Healthy Japanese, Chinese, and White Participants. The Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Active Ingredients From Hydroxysafflor Yellow A in Healthy Chinese Volunteers. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Montelukast Sodium Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions. Osimertinib Efficacy and Safety in Treating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1