A. Qureshi , J. Ho , L. Schenkel , B. Chin-Yee , U. Deotare , A. Meybodi , L. Saini , B. Sadikovic , I. Chin-Yee
{"title":"为急性髓性白血病患者及时提供以患者为中心的分子诊断检测:质量改进研究","authors":"A. Qureshi , J. Ho , L. Schenkel , B. Chin-Yee , U. Deotare , A. Meybodi , L. Saini , B. Sadikovic , I. Chin-Yee","doi":"10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>At many centers, molecular diagnostic (MD) testing for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) struggles to meet turn-around-time (TAT) required for therapeutic decision-making. At our tertiary referral centre, TAT for MD (karyotyping and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) exceeded 4 weeks, resulting in a 'quality gap' in our care pathway for AML. The goal of our study was to improve TAT for MD to optimize care for patients with AML/MDS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multidisciplinary team (hematologists, laboratory scientists, and hematopathologists) defined target TATs for each MD test based on guidelines and available therapies. TAT was evaluated from time of bone marrow to MD reporting. Retrospective review from 2021-2022 was performed to establish baseline time points to compare to post-intervention TATs. Root cause analysis was performed through stakeholder interviews to identify areas contributing to delays in TAT. The primary outcome was the ability to meet target TAT for MD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline TAT for cytogenetics and NGS varied widely and exceeded targets (Figure 1). Root cause analysis identified lack standardized ordering and testing for patients with AML due to inconsistent decision-maker awareness. Laboratory factors included batching and lack prioritization of AML samples. Interventions included a standardized AML testing algorithm triggered reflexively by flow cytometry at the time diagnosis. Impact of laboratory triggered algorithm for AML testing is shown in Figure 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Shared decision-making between hematologists and laboratory practitioners to develop an algorithm for reflex testing and treatment of AML improved TAT. Further improvements are underway to acheive targets, and lessons will be used to inform care pathways for AML/MDS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38435,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia Research Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213048924000128/pdfft?md5=c7c6e8b1ab03b7c7ac343da1529bcfcf&pid=1-s2.0-S2213048924000128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROVIDING TIMELY PATIENT-CENTERED MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Qureshi , J. Ho , L. Schenkel , B. Chin-Yee , U. Deotare , A. Meybodi , L. Saini , B. Sadikovic , I. Chin-Yee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>At many centers, molecular diagnostic (MD) testing for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) struggles to meet turn-around-time (TAT) required for therapeutic decision-making. At our tertiary referral centre, TAT for MD (karyotyping and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) exceeded 4 weeks, resulting in a 'quality gap' in our care pathway for AML. The goal of our study was to improve TAT for MD to optimize care for patients with AML/MDS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multidisciplinary team (hematologists, laboratory scientists, and hematopathologists) defined target TATs for each MD test based on guidelines and available therapies. TAT was evaluated from time of bone marrow to MD reporting. Retrospective review from 2021-2022 was performed to establish baseline time points to compare to post-intervention TATs. Root cause analysis was performed through stakeholder interviews to identify areas contributing to delays in TAT. The primary outcome was the ability to meet target TAT for MD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline TAT for cytogenetics and NGS varied widely and exceeded targets (Figure 1). Root cause analysis identified lack standardized ordering and testing for patients with AML due to inconsistent decision-maker awareness. Laboratory factors included batching and lack prioritization of AML samples. Interventions included a standardized AML testing algorithm triggered reflexively by flow cytometry at the time diagnosis. Impact of laboratory triggered algorithm for AML testing is shown in Figure 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Shared decision-making between hematologists and laboratory practitioners to develop an algorithm for reflex testing and treatment of AML improved TAT. Further improvements are underway to acheive targets, and lessons will be used to inform care pathways for AML/MDS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213048924000128/pdfft?md5=c7c6e8b1ab03b7c7ac343da1529bcfcf&pid=1-s2.0-S2213048924000128-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213048924000128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213048924000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言在许多中心,急性髓性白血病(AML)的分子诊断(MD)检测很难满足治疗决策所需的周转时间(TAT)。在我们的三级转诊中心,MD(核型和下一代测序 [NGS])的周转时间超过 4 周,导致我们的急性髓细胞白血病治疗路径存在 "质量差距"。我们的研究目标是改善 MD 的 TAT,以优化 AML/MDS 患者的治疗。方法一个多学科团队(血液学家、实验室科学家和血液病理学家)根据指南和现有疗法确定了每项 MD 检测的目标 TAT。评估从骨髓采集到 MD 报告的 TAT。对 2021-2022 年进行了回顾性审查,以确定基线时间点,并与干预后的 TAT 进行比较。通过利益相关者访谈进行了根本原因分析,以确定造成 TAT 延误的原因。主要结果是达到 MD 目标 TAT 的能力。结果细胞遗传学和 NGS 的基线 TAT 差异很大,超过了目标(图 1)。根本原因分析发现,由于决策者认识不一致,导致急性髓细胞性白血病患者缺乏标准化的排序和检测。实验室因素包括对急性髓细胞样本进行分批处理和缺乏优先排序。干预措施包括在诊断时通过流式细胞术触发标准化的急性髓细胞白血病检测算法。图 1 显示了实验室触发的急性髓细胞白血病检测算法的影响。结论血液学专家和实验室从业人员共同决策,制定急性髓细胞白血病条件反射检测和治疗算法,提高了 TAT。目前正在进一步改进,以实现目标,并将总结经验,为急性髓细胞性白血病/骨髓增生异常综合症的治疗路径提供参考。
PROVIDING TIMELY PATIENT-CENTERED MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT STUDY
Introduction
At many centers, molecular diagnostic (MD) testing for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) struggles to meet turn-around-time (TAT) required for therapeutic decision-making. At our tertiary referral centre, TAT for MD (karyotyping and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) exceeded 4 weeks, resulting in a 'quality gap' in our care pathway for AML. The goal of our study was to improve TAT for MD to optimize care for patients with AML/MDS.
Methods
A multidisciplinary team (hematologists, laboratory scientists, and hematopathologists) defined target TATs for each MD test based on guidelines and available therapies. TAT was evaluated from time of bone marrow to MD reporting. Retrospective review from 2021-2022 was performed to establish baseline time points to compare to post-intervention TATs. Root cause analysis was performed through stakeholder interviews to identify areas contributing to delays in TAT. The primary outcome was the ability to meet target TAT for MD.
Results
Baseline TAT for cytogenetics and NGS varied widely and exceeded targets (Figure 1). Root cause analysis identified lack standardized ordering and testing for patients with AML due to inconsistent decision-maker awareness. Laboratory factors included batching and lack prioritization of AML samples. Interventions included a standardized AML testing algorithm triggered reflexively by flow cytometry at the time diagnosis. Impact of laboratory triggered algorithm for AML testing is shown in Figure 1.
Conclusions
Shared decision-making between hematologists and laboratory practitioners to develop an algorithm for reflex testing and treatment of AML improved TAT. Further improvements are underway to acheive targets, and lessons will be used to inform care pathways for AML/MDS.