比较环境 DNA 采样和诱捕法检测难以捉摸的淡水龟的成本、工作量和性能

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1002/edn3.525
Elizabeth C. Sternhagen, Mark A. Davis, Eric R. Larson, Sarah E. Pearce, Stephen M. Ecrement, Aron D. Katz, Jinelle H. Sperry
{"title":"比较环境 DNA 采样和诱捕法检测难以捉摸的淡水龟的成本、工作量和性能","authors":"Elizabeth C. Sternhagen,&nbsp;Mark A. Davis,&nbsp;Eric R. Larson,&nbsp;Sarah E. Pearce,&nbsp;Stephen M. Ecrement,&nbsp;Aron D. Katz,&nbsp;Jinelle H. Sperry","doi":"10.1002/edn3.525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an effective and non-invasive technique for surveying and monitoring rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE) species. Compared to conventional capture-based sampling, eDNA analysis may offer a more cost-effective approach for surveying RTE species, yet few studies have compared their cost-efficiency—a critical consideration for conservation planning. We compared the costs, effort, and relative performance of aquatic eDNA sampling and conventional trapping for detecting the Alligator Snapping Turtle, <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> Troost, 1835, in southwest Louisiana, United States. Environmental DNA was sampled quarterly over 1 year (2018–2019) at 19 streams, including three streams where <i>M. temminckii</i> presence had been previously confirmed via conventional trapping efforts (2012–2013). Water samples from each stream were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess <i>M. temminckii</i> eDNA presence/absence. Time and costs (i.e., labor, travel, wages, and supplies) per detection via eDNA analysis and trapping were calculated and compared. Environmental DNA analysis documented the presence of <i>M. temminckii</i> DNA at two of the three streams where individuals had previously been trapped and yielded detections (qPCR amplifications) at 16 additional streams not previously sampled, expanding <i>M. temminckii</i>'s documented distribution at our study sites by 84%. Environmental DNA analysis returned a detection rate (per site) 5.55 times higher than conventional trapping and was 18.7% less expensive. Our results provide evidence that strategically deployed eDNA surveys may be an effective and cost-efficient approach for detecting freshwater RTE species. With eDNA analysis, additional resources can be invested toward expanding survey coverage and increasing sampling frequency, allowing managers to more effectively target subsequent intensive monitoring efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.525","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing cost, effort, and performance of environmental DNA sampling and trapping for detecting an elusive freshwater turtle\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth C. Sternhagen,&nbsp;Mark A. Davis,&nbsp;Eric R. Larson,&nbsp;Sarah E. Pearce,&nbsp;Stephen M. Ecrement,&nbsp;Aron D. Katz,&nbsp;Jinelle H. Sperry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an effective and non-invasive technique for surveying and monitoring rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE) species. Compared to conventional capture-based sampling, eDNA analysis may offer a more cost-effective approach for surveying RTE species, yet few studies have compared their cost-efficiency—a critical consideration for conservation planning. We compared the costs, effort, and relative performance of aquatic eDNA sampling and conventional trapping for detecting the Alligator Snapping Turtle, <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> Troost, 1835, in southwest Louisiana, United States. Environmental DNA was sampled quarterly over 1 year (2018–2019) at 19 streams, including three streams where <i>M. temminckii</i> presence had been previously confirmed via conventional trapping efforts (2012–2013). Water samples from each stream were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess <i>M. temminckii</i> eDNA presence/absence. Time and costs (i.e., labor, travel, wages, and supplies) per detection via eDNA analysis and trapping were calculated and compared. Environmental DNA analysis documented the presence of <i>M. temminckii</i> DNA at two of the three streams where individuals had previously been trapped and yielded detections (qPCR amplifications) at 16 additional streams not previously sampled, expanding <i>M. temminckii</i>'s documented distribution at our study sites by 84%. Environmental DNA analysis returned a detection rate (per site) 5.55 times higher than conventional trapping and was 18.7% less expensive. Our results provide evidence that strategically deployed eDNA surveys may be an effective and cost-efficient approach for detecting freshwater RTE species. With eDNA analysis, additional resources can be invested toward expanding survey coverage and increasing sampling frequency, allowing managers to more effectively target subsequent intensive monitoring efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.525\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境 DNA(eDNA)分析是调查和监测珍稀、受威胁或濒危(RTE)物种的一种有效的非侵入性技术。与传统的捕获式采样相比,eDNA 分析为调查 RTE 物种提供了一种更具成本效益的方法,但很少有研究对它们的成本效益进行比较--这是保护规划的一个重要考虑因素。我们在美国路易斯安那州西南部比较了水生 eDNA 采样和传统诱捕法检测鳄鱼鳄龟 Macrochelys temminckii Troost, 1835 的成本、工作量和相对性能。在 1 年内(2018-2019 年),每季度对 19 条溪流进行环境 DNA 采样,其中包括之前通过常规诱捕工作(2012-2013 年)确认存在 M. temminckii 的 3 条溪流。采用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)分析每条溪流的水样,以评估是否存在 M. temminckii eDNA。计算并比较了通过 eDNA 分析和诱捕每次检测的时间和成本(即劳动力、差旅、工资和耗材)。环境 DNA 分析结果表明,在之前诱捕过 M. temminckii 个体的三条溪流中,有两条溪流中存在 M. temminckii DNA,并在另外 16 条之前未采样的溪流中检测到了 M. temminckii(qPCR 扩增),从而将 M. temminckii 在我们研究地点的分布范围扩大了 84%。环境 DNA 分析的检测率(每个地点)是传统诱捕法的 5.55 倍,而成本却降低了 18.7%。我们的研究结果证明,战略性地部署 eDNA 调查可能是检测淡水 RTE 物种的一种有效、经济的方法。通过 eDNA 分析,可以将更多资源投入到扩大调查覆盖范围和增加采样频率上,从而使管理者能够更有效地确定后续密集监测工作的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing cost, effort, and performance of environmental DNA sampling and trapping for detecting an elusive freshwater turtle

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an effective and non-invasive technique for surveying and monitoring rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE) species. Compared to conventional capture-based sampling, eDNA analysis may offer a more cost-effective approach for surveying RTE species, yet few studies have compared their cost-efficiency—a critical consideration for conservation planning. We compared the costs, effort, and relative performance of aquatic eDNA sampling and conventional trapping for detecting the Alligator Snapping Turtle, Macrochelys temminckii Troost, 1835, in southwest Louisiana, United States. Environmental DNA was sampled quarterly over 1 year (2018–2019) at 19 streams, including three streams where M. temminckii presence had been previously confirmed via conventional trapping efforts (2012–2013). Water samples from each stream were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess M. temminckii eDNA presence/absence. Time and costs (i.e., labor, travel, wages, and supplies) per detection via eDNA analysis and trapping were calculated and compared. Environmental DNA analysis documented the presence of M. temminckii DNA at two of the three streams where individuals had previously been trapped and yielded detections (qPCR amplifications) at 16 additional streams not previously sampled, expanding M. temminckii's documented distribution at our study sites by 84%. Environmental DNA analysis returned a detection rate (per site) 5.55 times higher than conventional trapping and was 18.7% less expensive. Our results provide evidence that strategically deployed eDNA surveys may be an effective and cost-efficient approach for detecting freshwater RTE species. With eDNA analysis, additional resources can be invested toward expanding survey coverage and increasing sampling frequency, allowing managers to more effectively target subsequent intensive monitoring efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1