随机试验的元分析:秋水仙碱用于心血管疾病二级预防的有效性和安全性

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1155/2024/8646351
Elie Akl, Nazanin Sahami, Christopher Labos, Jacques Genest, Ali Zgheib, Nicolo Piazza, Sanjit Jolly
{"title":"随机试验的元分析:秋水仙碱用于心血管疾病二级预防的有效性和安全性","authors":"Elie Akl,&nbsp;Nazanin Sahami,&nbsp;Christopher Labos,&nbsp;Jacques Genest,&nbsp;Ali Zgheib,&nbsp;Nicolo Piazza,&nbsp;Sanjit Jolly","doi":"10.1155/2024/8646351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Background</i>. Colchicine has shown potential cardioprotective effects owing to its broad anti-inflammatory properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess its safety and efficacy in secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). <i>Methods</i>. We searched Ovid Healthstar, MEDLINE, and Embase (inception to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cardiovascular effects of colchicine compared with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Study-level data on efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using the Peto method. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. <i>Results</i>. A total of 8 RCTs were included with a follow-up duration of ≥1 month, comprising a total of 12,151 patients. Compared with placebo or usual care, colchicine was associated with a significant risk reduction in the primary outcome (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 52%). Risks of MI (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.003; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 33%), stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74, <i>P</i> = 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), and unplanned coronary revascularization (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82, <i>P</i> = 0.0001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 58%) were all reduced in the colchicine group. Rates of CV and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups, but there was an increase in noncardiac deaths with colchicine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15, <i>P</i> = 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 51%). The occurrence of all other adverse events was similar between the two groups, including GI reactions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20, <i>P</i> = 0.35; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 42%) and infections (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.28, <i>P</i> = 0.74; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 53%). <i>Conclusions</i>. Colchicine therapy may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD; however, there remains a concern about non-CV mortality. Further trials are underway that will shed light on non-CV mortality and colchicine NCT03048825, and NCT02898610.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8646351","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"Elie Akl,&nbsp;Nazanin Sahami,&nbsp;Christopher Labos,&nbsp;Jacques Genest,&nbsp;Ali Zgheib,&nbsp;Nicolo Piazza,&nbsp;Sanjit Jolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8646351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Background</i>. Colchicine has shown potential cardioprotective effects owing to its broad anti-inflammatory properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess its safety and efficacy in secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). <i>Methods</i>. We searched Ovid Healthstar, MEDLINE, and Embase (inception to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cardiovascular effects of colchicine compared with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Study-level data on efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using the Peto method. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. <i>Results</i>. A total of 8 RCTs were included with a follow-up duration of ≥1 month, comprising a total of 12,151 patients. Compared with placebo or usual care, colchicine was associated with a significant risk reduction in the primary outcome (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 52%). Risks of MI (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.003; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 33%), stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74, <i>P</i> = 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), and unplanned coronary revascularization (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82, <i>P</i> = 0.0001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 58%) were all reduced in the colchicine group. Rates of CV and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups, but there was an increase in noncardiac deaths with colchicine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15, <i>P</i> = 0.01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 51%). The occurrence of all other adverse events was similar between the two groups, including GI reactions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20, <i>P</i> = 0.35; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 42%) and infections (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.28, <i>P</i> = 0.74; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 53%). <i>Conclusions</i>. Colchicine therapy may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD; however, there remains a concern about non-CV mortality. Further trials are underway that will shed light on non-CV mortality and colchicine NCT03048825, and NCT02898610.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8646351\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8646351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8646351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。秋水仙碱因其广泛的抗炎特性而具有潜在的心脏保护作用。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估秋水仙碱对已确诊冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者进行二级预防的安全性和有效性。研究方法我们检索了 Ovid Healthstar、MEDLINE 和 Embase(起始时间至 2022 年 5 月)中评估秋水仙碱与安慰剂或常规治疗相比对 CAD 患者心血管影响的随机对照试验 (RCT)。有关疗效和安全性结果的研究数据采用佩托法进行了汇总。主要结果是心血管(CV)死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或中风的复合结果。结果。共纳入了 8 项随访时间≥1 个月的 RCT,共有 12,151 名患者。与安慰剂或常规治疗相比,秋水仙碱能显著降低主要结果的风险(几率比(OR)0.70,95% CI 0.60 至 0.83,;)。秋水仙碱组发生心肌梗死(OR 0.75,95% CI 0.62 至 0.91;)、中风(OR 0.47,95% CI 0.30 至 0.74;)和意外冠状动脉血运重建(OR 0.67,95% CI 0.55 至 0.82;)的风险均有所降低。两组的冠心病和全因死亡率没有差异,但秋水仙碱组的非心源性死亡增加(OR 1.54,95% CI 1.10 至 2.15,;)。两组的其他不良事件发生率相似,包括消化道反应(OR 1.06,95% CI 0.94 至 1.20;)和感染(OR 1.04,95% CI 0.84 至 1.28;)。结论秋水仙碱治疗可降低已确诊的 CAD 患者未来发生心血管事件的风险;但非心血管疾病死亡率仍令人担忧。有关非心血管疾病死亡率和秋水仙碱的进一步试验正在 NCT03048825 和 NCT02898610 进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Background. Colchicine has shown potential cardioprotective effects owing to its broad anti-inflammatory properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess its safety and efficacy in secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. We searched Ovid Healthstar, MEDLINE, and Embase (inception to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cardiovascular effects of colchicine compared with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Study-level data on efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using the Peto method. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Results. A total of 8 RCTs were included with a follow-up duration of ≥1 month, comprising a total of 12,151 patients. Compared with placebo or usual care, colchicine was associated with a significant risk reduction in the primary outcome (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, P < 0.0001; I2 = 52%). Risks of MI (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, P = 0.003; I2 = 33%), stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), and unplanned coronary revascularization (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82, P = 0.0001; I2 = 58%) were all reduced in the colchicine group. Rates of CV and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups, but there was an increase in noncardiac deaths with colchicine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15, P = 0.01; I2 = 51%). The occurrence of all other adverse events was similar between the two groups, including GI reactions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20, P = 0.35; I2 = 42%) and infections (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.74; I2 = 53%). Conclusions. Colchicine therapy may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD; however, there remains a concern about non-CV mortality. Further trials are underway that will shed light on non-CV mortality and colchicine NCT03048825, and NCT02898610.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1