Ryan N Moran, Alexandra Curry, J Russell Guin, Margaret Stran
{"title":"大学适应性运动员在前庭/眼球运动筛查中的基线表现。","authors":"Ryan N Moran, Alexandra Curry, J Russell Guin, Margaret Stran","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0636.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Concussion assessment in adapted and parasport athletes has continued to evolve with growing considerations in parasports, but little is known about vestibular/ocular performance assessment in this sample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine baseline performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in collegiate adapted athletes. A secondary objective was to investigate the role of sex, history of concussion, and functional classification on baseline measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University adapted athletics facility.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Fifty-four collegiate adapted athletes (age = 21.19 ± 2.6 years) from multiple institutions' adapted athletics programs across the United States.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Adapted athletes completed a baseline VOMS assessment while at the host university for in-season competition and tournaments. Independent variables were sex, history of concussion and functional classification (1.0-4.5 at 0.5 intervals). Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening performance consisted of pretest symptoms (headache, dizziness, nausea, and fogginess) and postitem (eg, smooth pursuits, saccades) symptom provocation or change from pretest scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A proportion of 50.9% reported zero symptom provocation on the VOMS, with 72% having no pretest symptoms. No sex differences were noted on the VOMS (P > .05); however, adapted athletes with a history of concussion reported greater VOMS provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .008) than those with no history. Higher functional classifications (2.0-4.5) reported greater provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .010), horizontal and vertical (P = .043 and .048) vestibular/ocular reflex, and vestibular/ocular reflex cancellation (P = .036) than 1.0-1.5 athletes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide context for baseline VOMS performance in collegiate adapted athletes and identifying modifiers at baseline. Special consideration is warranted on vestibular and oculomotor assessment in adapted and parasport athletes with a history of concussion and higher functional classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"991-996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collegiate Adapted Athlete Baseline Performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan N Moran, Alexandra Curry, J Russell Guin, Margaret Stran\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0636.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Concussion assessment in adapted and parasport athletes has continued to evolve with growing considerations in parasports, but little is known about vestibular/ocular performance assessment in this sample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine baseline performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in collegiate adapted athletes. A secondary objective was to investigate the role of sex, history of concussion, and functional classification on baseline measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University adapted athletics facility.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Fifty-four collegiate adapted athletes (age = 21.19 ± 2.6 years) from multiple institutions' adapted athletics programs across the United States.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Adapted athletes completed a baseline VOMS assessment while at the host university for in-season competition and tournaments. Independent variables were sex, history of concussion and functional classification (1.0-4.5 at 0.5 intervals). Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening performance consisted of pretest symptoms (headache, dizziness, nausea, and fogginess) and postitem (eg, smooth pursuits, saccades) symptom provocation or change from pretest scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A proportion of 50.9% reported zero symptom provocation on the VOMS, with 72% having no pretest symptoms. No sex differences were noted on the VOMS (P > .05); however, adapted athletes with a history of concussion reported greater VOMS provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .008) than those with no history. Higher functional classifications (2.0-4.5) reported greater provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .010), horizontal and vertical (P = .043 and .048) vestibular/ocular reflex, and vestibular/ocular reflex cancellation (P = .036) than 1.0-1.5 athletes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide context for baseline VOMS performance in collegiate adapted athletes and identifying modifiers at baseline. Special consideration is warranted on vestibular and oculomotor assessment in adapted and parasport athletes with a history of concussion and higher functional classifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"991-996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0636.23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0636.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:随着人们对辅助运动的考虑越来越多,对适应性运动和辅助运动运动员的脑震荡评估也在不断发展,但对这一样本中的前庭/眼部表现评估却知之甚少:目的:研究大学适应性运动员前庭/眼球运动筛查(VOMS)的基线表现。次要目的是调查性别、脑震荡史和功能分类对基线测量结果的影响:设计:横断面研究:患者或其他参与者:54名来自美国多所院校适应性运动项目的大学适应性运动员(年龄=21.19±2.6岁):主要结果测量:适应性运动员在主办大学参加赛季中的比赛和锦标赛时完成 VOMS 基线评估。自变量包括性别、脑震荡史和功能分类(1.0-4.5,间隔为 0.5)。VOMS表现包括测试前症状(头痛、头晕、恶心和迷糊)和测试后项目(如顺利追逐、眼球移动)的症状诱发情况/与测试前分数相比的变化:50.9%的受试者在VOMS测试中没有出现诱发症状,72%的受试者在测试前没有任何症状。VOMS没有发现性别差异(p>0.05);然而,与无脑震荡病史的运动员相比,有脑震荡病史的改编运动员在水平囊视上的VOMS激惹症状更大(p=0.008)。功能分级较高(2.0-4.5)的运动员在水平囊视(p=0.010)、水平和垂直囊视(p=0.043 和 0.048)、前庭眼反射(VOR)和 VOR 取消(p=0.036)方面的激惹程度高于 1.0-1.5 的运动员:我们的研究结果为大学适应性运动员的 VOMS 基线表现提供了背景,并确定了基线的调节因素。对于有脑震荡病史和功能分级较高的适应性运动和准运动运动员,需要特别考虑前庭和眼球运动评估。
Collegiate Adapted Athlete Baseline Performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening.
Context: Concussion assessment in adapted and parasport athletes has continued to evolve with growing considerations in parasports, but little is known about vestibular/ocular performance assessment in this sample.
Objective: To examine baseline performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in collegiate adapted athletes. A secondary objective was to investigate the role of sex, history of concussion, and functional classification on baseline measures.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: University adapted athletics facility.
Patients or other participants: Fifty-four collegiate adapted athletes (age = 21.19 ± 2.6 years) from multiple institutions' adapted athletics programs across the United States.
Main outcome measure(s): Adapted athletes completed a baseline VOMS assessment while at the host university for in-season competition and tournaments. Independent variables were sex, history of concussion and functional classification (1.0-4.5 at 0.5 intervals). Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening performance consisted of pretest symptoms (headache, dizziness, nausea, and fogginess) and postitem (eg, smooth pursuits, saccades) symptom provocation or change from pretest scores.
Results: A proportion of 50.9% reported zero symptom provocation on the VOMS, with 72% having no pretest symptoms. No sex differences were noted on the VOMS (P > .05); however, adapted athletes with a history of concussion reported greater VOMS provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .008) than those with no history. Higher functional classifications (2.0-4.5) reported greater provocation on horizontal saccades (P = .010), horizontal and vertical (P = .043 and .048) vestibular/ocular reflex, and vestibular/ocular reflex cancellation (P = .036) than 1.0-1.5 athletes.
Conclusions: Our findings provide context for baseline VOMS performance in collegiate adapted athletes and identifying modifiers at baseline. Special consideration is warranted on vestibular and oculomotor assessment in adapted and parasport athletes with a history of concussion and higher functional classifications.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.