终末期肾病患者外周动脉血管再通术后入路部位并发症发生率:血管闭合设备与人工压迫的比较。

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1177/15385744241239492
Yu-Ying Lu, Ying-Chang Tung, Ming-Yun Ho, Jih-Kai Yeh, Cheng-Hung Lee, Hsin-Fu Lee, Shing-Hsien Chou, Chao-Yung Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ming-Lung Tsai
{"title":"终末期肾病患者外周动脉血管再通术后入路部位并发症发生率:血管闭合设备与人工压迫的比较。","authors":"Yu-Ying Lu, Ying-Chang Tung, Ming-Yun Ho, Jih-Kai Yeh, Cheng-Hung Lee, Hsin-Fu Lee, Shing-Hsien Chou, Chao-Yung Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ming-Lung Tsai","doi":"10.1177/15385744241239492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L <i>P</i> = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access Site Complication Rates Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization in patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices and Manual Compression.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Ying Lu, Ying-Chang Tung, Ming-Yun Ho, Jih-Kai Yeh, Cheng-Hung Lee, Hsin-Fu Lee, Shing-Hsien Chou, Chao-Yung Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ming-Lung Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744241239492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L <i>P</i> = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241239492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241239492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)后,可使用手动加压(MC)或血管闭合器(VCD)实现止血。然而,在接受经皮穿刺血管成形术(PTA)的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,VCD 与 MC 的安全性和有效性比较数据有限。因此,本研究对接受 PTA 的 ESRD 患者使用 VCD 和 MC 的安全性和有效性进行了比较:这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间在台湾长庚纪念医院接受外周介入治疗的 ESRD 患者的数据。患者被分为 VCD 组和 MC 组。主要终点是穿刺部位并发症的综合指标,包括急性肢体缺血、明显血肿、假性动脉瘤和需要输血的穿刺部位出血:我们纳入了 264 名接受 PTA 的 ESRD 患者,其中 60 人接受了 VCD,204 人接受了 MC。VCD组的穿刺部位并发症发生率为3.3%,MC组为4.4%(危险比:0.75;95%置信区间:0.16-3.56 L P = 1.000),表明组间差异不显著:结论:在接受外周介入治疗的 ESRD 患者中,VCD 和 MC 的止血安全性和有效性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access Site Complication Rates Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization in patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices and Manual Compression.

Objectives: Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.

Results: We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L P = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.

Conclusion: VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Popliteal Vein Entrapment as a Rare Form of Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome. Challenging Conventional Treatment: Retrograde Implantation of a Covered Stent in Superior Mensenteric Artery Occlusion Case. Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Acute Vascular Complications of VA-ECMO in COVID-19 Patients. Does COVID-19 Affect the Outcome? Gender-Specific Long-Term Results After Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Depending on the Site of Distal Anastomosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1