{"title":"终末期肾病患者外周动脉血管再通术后入路部位并发症发生率:血管闭合设备与人工压迫的比较。","authors":"Yu-Ying Lu, Ying-Chang Tung, Ming-Yun Ho, Jih-Kai Yeh, Cheng-Hung Lee, Hsin-Fu Lee, Shing-Hsien Chou, Chao-Yung Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ming-Lung Tsai","doi":"10.1177/15385744241239492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L <i>P</i> = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access Site Complication Rates Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization in patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices and Manual Compression.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Ying Lu, Ying-Chang Tung, Ming-Yun Ho, Jih-Kai Yeh, Cheng-Hung Lee, Hsin-Fu Lee, Shing-Hsien Chou, Chao-Yung Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ming-Lung Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744241239492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L <i>P</i> = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and endovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241239492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241239492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)后,可使用手动加压(MC)或血管闭合器(VCD)实现止血。然而,在接受经皮穿刺血管成形术(PTA)的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,VCD 与 MC 的安全性和有效性比较数据有限。因此,本研究对接受 PTA 的 ESRD 患者使用 VCD 和 MC 的安全性和有效性进行了比较:这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间在台湾长庚纪念医院接受外周介入治疗的 ESRD 患者的数据。患者被分为 VCD 组和 MC 组。主要终点是穿刺部位并发症的综合指标,包括急性肢体缺血、明显血肿、假性动脉瘤和需要输血的穿刺部位出血:我们纳入了 264 名接受 PTA 的 ESRD 患者,其中 60 人接受了 VCD,204 人接受了 MC。VCD组的穿刺部位并发症发生率为3.3%,MC组为4.4%(危险比:0.75;95%置信区间:0.16-3.56 L P = 1.000),表明组间差异不显著:结论:在接受外周介入治疗的 ESRD 患者中,VCD 和 MC 的止血安全性和有效性相当。
Access Site Complication Rates Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization in patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices and Manual Compression.
Objectives: Manual compression (MC) or vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, limited data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of VCDs vs MC in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing PTA are available. Accordingly, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of VCD and MC in patients with ESRD undergoing PTA.
Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included the data of patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into VCD and MC groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of puncture site complications, including acute limb ischemia, marked hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and puncture site bleeding requiring blood transfusion.
Results: We included 264 patients with ESRD undergoing PTA, of whom 60 received a VCD and 204 received MC. The incidence of puncture site complications was 3.3% in the VCD group and 4.4% in the MC group (hazard ratio: .75; 95% confidence interval: .16-3.56 L P = 1.000), indicating no significant between-group difference.
Conclusion: VCDs and MC had comparable safety and effectiveness for hemostasis in patients with ESRD undergoing peripheral intervention.