磁共振引导下的头颈部癌症立体定向放射治疗

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100760
He Wang , Jinzhong Yang , Anna Lee , Jack Phan , Tze Yee Lim , Clifton D. Fuller , Eun Young Han , Dong Joo Rhee , Travis Salzillo , Yao Zhao , Nitish Chopra , Mary Pham , Pam Castillo , Angela Sobremonte , Amy C. Moreno , Jay P. Reddy , David Rosenthal , Adam S. Garden , Xin Wang
{"title":"磁共振引导下的头颈部癌症立体定向放射治疗","authors":"He Wang ,&nbsp;Jinzhong Yang ,&nbsp;Anna Lee ,&nbsp;Jack Phan ,&nbsp;Tze Yee Lim ,&nbsp;Clifton D. Fuller ,&nbsp;Eun Young Han ,&nbsp;Dong Joo Rhee ,&nbsp;Travis Salzillo ,&nbsp;Yao Zhao ,&nbsp;Nitish Chopra ,&nbsp;Mary Pham ,&nbsp;Pam Castillo ,&nbsp;Angela Sobremonte ,&nbsp;Amy C. Moreno ,&nbsp;Jay P. Reddy ,&nbsp;David Rosenthal ,&nbsp;Adam S. Garden ,&nbsp;Xin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the advantage of utilizing high soft tissue contrast imaging to track daily changes in target and critical organs throughout the entire radiation treatment course. Head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to treat localized lesions within a shorter timeframe. The purpose of this study is to examine the dosimetric difference between the step-and-shot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans on Elekta Unity and our clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on Varian TrueBeam for HN SBRT.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Fourteen patients treated on TrueBeam sTx with VMAT treatment plans were re-planned in the Monaco treatment planning system for Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL). The plan qualities, including target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, nearby critical organ doses, gradient index and low dose bath volume, were compared between VMAT and Monaco IMRT plans. Additionally, we evaluated the Unity adaptive plans of adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows using simulated setup errors for five patients and assessed the outcomes of our treated patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Monaco IMRT plans achieved comparable results to VMAT plans in terms of target coverage, uniformity and homogeneity, with slightly higher target maximum and mean doses. The critical organ doses in Monaco IMRT plans all met clinical goals; however, the mean doses and low dose bath volumes were higher than in VMAT plans. The adaptive plans demonstrated that the ATP workflow may result in degraded target coverage and OAR doses for HN SBRT, while the ATS workflow can maintain the plan quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of Monaco treatment planning and online adaptation can achieve dosimetric results comparable to VMAT plans, with the additional benefits of real-time tracking of target volume and nearby critical structures. This offers the potential to treat aggressive and variable tumors in HN SBRT and improve local control and treatment toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000375/pdfft?md5=940bf7627180ef0eac9d97bb82b0e842&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000375-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MR-guided stereotactic radiation therapy for head and neck cancers\",\"authors\":\"He Wang ,&nbsp;Jinzhong Yang ,&nbsp;Anna Lee ,&nbsp;Jack Phan ,&nbsp;Tze Yee Lim ,&nbsp;Clifton D. Fuller ,&nbsp;Eun Young Han ,&nbsp;Dong Joo Rhee ,&nbsp;Travis Salzillo ,&nbsp;Yao Zhao ,&nbsp;Nitish Chopra ,&nbsp;Mary Pham ,&nbsp;Pam Castillo ,&nbsp;Angela Sobremonte ,&nbsp;Amy C. Moreno ,&nbsp;Jay P. Reddy ,&nbsp;David Rosenthal ,&nbsp;Adam S. Garden ,&nbsp;Xin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the advantage of utilizing high soft tissue contrast imaging to track daily changes in target and critical organs throughout the entire radiation treatment course. Head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to treat localized lesions within a shorter timeframe. The purpose of this study is to examine the dosimetric difference between the step-and-shot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans on Elekta Unity and our clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on Varian TrueBeam for HN SBRT.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Fourteen patients treated on TrueBeam sTx with VMAT treatment plans were re-planned in the Monaco treatment planning system for Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL). The plan qualities, including target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, nearby critical organ doses, gradient index and low dose bath volume, were compared between VMAT and Monaco IMRT plans. Additionally, we evaluated the Unity adaptive plans of adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows using simulated setup errors for five patients and assessed the outcomes of our treated patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Monaco IMRT plans achieved comparable results to VMAT plans in terms of target coverage, uniformity and homogeneity, with slightly higher target maximum and mean doses. The critical organ doses in Monaco IMRT plans all met clinical goals; however, the mean doses and low dose bath volumes were higher than in VMAT plans. The adaptive plans demonstrated that the ATP workflow may result in degraded target coverage and OAR doses for HN SBRT, while the ATS workflow can maintain the plan quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of Monaco treatment planning and online adaptation can achieve dosimetric results comparable to VMAT plans, with the additional benefits of real-time tracking of target volume and nearby critical structures. This offers the potential to treat aggressive and variable tumors in HN SBRT and improve local control and treatment toxicity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000375/pdfft?md5=940bf7627180ef0eac9d97bb82b0e842&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000375-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的MR引导放射治疗(MRgRT)的优点是利用高软组织对比度成像技术,在整个放射治疗过程中跟踪靶器官和重要器官的日常变化。头颈部立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)越来越多地用于在较短时间内治疗局部病变。本研究的目的是检查Elekta Unity上的分步射频调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划与瓦里安TrueBeam上用于HN SBRT的临床容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划之间的剂量学差异。我们比较了 VMAT 和 Monaco IMRT 计划的计划质量,包括目标覆盖率、一致性、均匀性、附近关键器官剂量、梯度指数和低剂量浴体积。此外,我们还使用模拟设置误差评估了五名患者的适应位置(ATP)和适应形状(ATS)工作流程的统一适应计划,并评估了治疗患者的疗效。结果摩纳哥 IMRT 计划在目标覆盖范围、一致性和均匀性方面取得了与 VMAT 计划相当的效果,但目标最大剂量和平均剂量略高。摩纳哥 IMRT 计划的关键器官剂量均达到了临床目标;但平均剂量和低剂量浴体积高于 VMAT 计划。自适应计划表明,ATP工作流程可能会导致HN SBRT的目标覆盖范围和OAR剂量降低,而ATS工作流程则可以保持计划质量。这为在 HN SBRT 中治疗侵袭性和多变性肿瘤提供了可能,并改善了局部控制和治疗毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MR-guided stereotactic radiation therapy for head and neck cancers

Purpose

MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the advantage of utilizing high soft tissue contrast imaging to track daily changes in target and critical organs throughout the entire radiation treatment course. Head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to treat localized lesions within a shorter timeframe. The purpose of this study is to examine the dosimetric difference between the step-and-shot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans on Elekta Unity and our clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on Varian TrueBeam for HN SBRT.

Method

Fourteen patients treated on TrueBeam sTx with VMAT treatment plans were re-planned in the Monaco treatment planning system for Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL). The plan qualities, including target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, nearby critical organ doses, gradient index and low dose bath volume, were compared between VMAT and Monaco IMRT plans. Additionally, we evaluated the Unity adaptive plans of adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows using simulated setup errors for five patients and assessed the outcomes of our treated patients.

Results

Monaco IMRT plans achieved comparable results to VMAT plans in terms of target coverage, uniformity and homogeneity, with slightly higher target maximum and mean doses. The critical organ doses in Monaco IMRT plans all met clinical goals; however, the mean doses and low dose bath volumes were higher than in VMAT plans. The adaptive plans demonstrated that the ATP workflow may result in degraded target coverage and OAR doses for HN SBRT, while the ATS workflow can maintain the plan quality.

Conclusion

The use of Monaco treatment planning and online adaptation can achieve dosimetric results comparable to VMAT plans, with the additional benefits of real-time tracking of target volume and nearby critical structures. This offers the potential to treat aggressive and variable tumors in HN SBRT and improve local control and treatment toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1