综述:智力和发育障碍人士医疗保健的国际视角

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12500
Marian E. J. Breuer, Tim Pelle, Geraline L. Leusink, Christine Linehan, Jenneken Naaldenberg
{"title":"综述:智力和发育障碍人士医疗保健的国际视角","authors":"Marian E. J. Breuer,&nbsp;Tim Pelle,&nbsp;Geraline L. Leusink,&nbsp;Christine Linehan,&nbsp;Jenneken Naaldenberg","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The organization of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) varies across countries. Each country has developed unique practices embedded in their historical and organizational context. Understanding and sharing these practices across borders facilitates mutual understanding about healthcare needs of people with IDD and facilitates the adoption of effective strategies in other countries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To provide a synthesis across the country-specific papers in the JPPID special edition and thereby identify underlying trends, challenges, and best practices in healthcare for people with IDD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The papers in this special edition, which describe the organization of healthcare for people with IDD in 13 countries, were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis, focusing on general characteristics, history, and context, organization of healthcare for people with IDD, challenges, and best practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Each paper described a specific national history of evolution of healthcare for people with IDD, but our analysis showed that countries face similar challenges in healthcare for people with IDD. These challenges cover (1) access to healthcare, (2) quality of healthcare, (3) implementation, and (4) visibility of people with IDD. Consequently, people with IDD continue to face significant health disparities. Several best practices have been developed, ranging from making mainstream healthcare more accessible and suitable to providing specialized services, and advocating and raising awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This synthesis is the first paper to include perspectives on healthcare for people with IDD across 13 countries. We identified that, despite differences in context, countries face similar challenges in improving healthcare for people with IDD. International collaboration and networking can provide essential tools in reducing health disparities that people with IDD face, starting with the challenges identified in this synthesis. This will require effort to especially include low- and middle-income countries.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesis: International perspectives on healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Marian E. J. Breuer,&nbsp;Tim Pelle,&nbsp;Geraline L. Leusink,&nbsp;Christine Linehan,&nbsp;Jenneken Naaldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The organization of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) varies across countries. Each country has developed unique practices embedded in their historical and organizational context. Understanding and sharing these practices across borders facilitates mutual understanding about healthcare needs of people with IDD and facilitates the adoption of effective strategies in other countries.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To provide a synthesis across the country-specific papers in the JPPID special edition and thereby identify underlying trends, challenges, and best practices in healthcare for people with IDD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The papers in this special edition, which describe the organization of healthcare for people with IDD in 13 countries, were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis, focusing on general characteristics, history, and context, organization of healthcare for people with IDD, challenges, and best practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Each paper described a specific national history of evolution of healthcare for people with IDD, but our analysis showed that countries face similar challenges in healthcare for people with IDD. These challenges cover (1) access to healthcare, (2) quality of healthcare, (3) implementation, and (4) visibility of people with IDD. Consequently, people with IDD continue to face significant health disparities. Several best practices have been developed, ranging from making mainstream healthcare more accessible and suitable to providing specialized services, and advocating and raising awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This synthesis is the first paper to include perspectives on healthcare for people with IDD across 13 countries. We identified that, despite differences in context, countries face similar challenges in improving healthcare for people with IDD. International collaboration and networking can provide essential tools in reducing health disparities that people with IDD face, starting with the challenges identified in this synthesis. This will require effort to especially include low- and middle-income countries.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12500\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 各国为智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者提供的医疗保健服务各不相同。每个国家都在其历史和组织背景下形成了独特的做法。了解和分享这些跨国界的实践经验有助于相互了解智障人士的医疗保健需求,也有助于其他国家采用有效的策略。 目的 对 JPPID 特刊中的各国论文进行综述,从而确定 IDD 患者医疗保健的基本趋势、挑战和最佳实践。 方法 采用专题内容分析法对本特刊中介绍 13 个国家 IDD 患者医疗保健组织情况的论文进行定性分析,重点关注一般特征、历史和背景、IDD 患者医疗保健组织情况、挑战和最佳实践。 结果 每篇论文都描述了特定国家 IDD 患者医疗保健的发展历史,但我们的分析表明,各国在 IDD 患者医疗保健方面面临着相似的挑战。这些挑战包括:(1) 获得医疗保健的机会;(2) 医疗保健的质量;(3) 实施;(4) IDD 患者的能见度。因此,IDD 患者仍然面临着严重的健康差异。从使主流医疗保健更方便、更合适,到提供专门服务、宣传和提高认识,已经形成了一些最佳做法。 结论 本综述是第一份包含 13 个国家的 IDD 患者医疗保健观点的论文。我们发现,尽管国情不同,但各国在改善 IDD 患者医疗保健方面面临着相似的挑战。从本综述中发现的挑战入手,国际合作和网络可以为减少智障人士面临的健康差距提供重要工具。这就需要努力将中低收入国家特别包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthesis: International perspectives on healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Background

The organization of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) varies across countries. Each country has developed unique practices embedded in their historical and organizational context. Understanding and sharing these practices across borders facilitates mutual understanding about healthcare needs of people with IDD and facilitates the adoption of effective strategies in other countries.

Aim

To provide a synthesis across the country-specific papers in the JPPID special edition and thereby identify underlying trends, challenges, and best practices in healthcare for people with IDD.

Methods

The papers in this special edition, which describe the organization of healthcare for people with IDD in 13 countries, were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis, focusing on general characteristics, history, and context, organization of healthcare for people with IDD, challenges, and best practices.

Results

Each paper described a specific national history of evolution of healthcare for people with IDD, but our analysis showed that countries face similar challenges in healthcare for people with IDD. These challenges cover (1) access to healthcare, (2) quality of healthcare, (3) implementation, and (4) visibility of people with IDD. Consequently, people with IDD continue to face significant health disparities. Several best practices have been developed, ranging from making mainstream healthcare more accessible and suitable to providing specialized services, and advocating and raising awareness.

Conclusions

This synthesis is the first paper to include perspectives on healthcare for people with IDD across 13 countries. We identified that, despite differences in context, countries face similar challenges in improving healthcare for people with IDD. International collaboration and networking can provide essential tools in reducing health disparities that people with IDD face, starting with the challenges identified in this synthesis. This will require effort to especially include low- and middle-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries “It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England Transitional challenges: Psychotropic medication and residential setting among young adults with intellectual disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1