在线评论中的自我选择偏差如何影响买家满意度?产品类型视角

IF 6.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Decision Support Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114199
Yancong Xie , William Yeoh , Jingguo Wang
{"title":"在线评论中的自我选择偏差如何影响买家满意度?产品类型视角","authors":"Yancong Xie ,&nbsp;William Yeoh ,&nbsp;Jingguo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online reviews play a crucial role in shaping buyers' purchase decisions. However, previous research has highlighted the existence of self-selection biases among buyers who contribute to reviews, which in turn leads to biased distributions of review ratings. This research aims to explore the further influences of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction through agent-based modeling, considering two product differentiations: search and experience differentiation, as well as vertical and horizontal differentiation. Our findings reveal that self-selection bias can have varying positive and negative effects on the usefulness of online reviews in suggesting product quality (i.e., review utility) to buyers, thus affecting buyer satisfaction. While self-selection bias tends to decrease review utility in most scenarios, interestingly, it can also increase review utility by enabling a “screening” function of online reviews in addition to its normal “measuring” function. We also find that the varying effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction are contingent upon the type of products under scrutiny and the interaction of different types of self-selection bias. This research makes valuable contributions to the existing literature on online reviews by introducing a novel theory to explain the effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55181,"journal":{"name":"Decision Support Systems","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 114199"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000320/pdfft?md5=3bdabb05bd9df1801e7b36469e468fee&pid=1-s2.0-S0167923624000320-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How self-selection Bias in online reviews affects buyer satisfaction: A product type perspective\",\"authors\":\"Yancong Xie ,&nbsp;William Yeoh ,&nbsp;Jingguo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Online reviews play a crucial role in shaping buyers' purchase decisions. However, previous research has highlighted the existence of self-selection biases among buyers who contribute to reviews, which in turn leads to biased distributions of review ratings. This research aims to explore the further influences of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction through agent-based modeling, considering two product differentiations: search and experience differentiation, as well as vertical and horizontal differentiation. Our findings reveal that self-selection bias can have varying positive and negative effects on the usefulness of online reviews in suggesting product quality (i.e., review utility) to buyers, thus affecting buyer satisfaction. While self-selection bias tends to decrease review utility in most scenarios, interestingly, it can also increase review utility by enabling a “screening” function of online reviews in addition to its normal “measuring” function. We also find that the varying effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction are contingent upon the type of products under scrutiny and the interaction of different types of self-selection bias. This research makes valuable contributions to the existing literature on online reviews by introducing a novel theory to explain the effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000320/pdfft?md5=3bdabb05bd9df1801e7b36469e468fee&pid=1-s2.0-S0167923624000320-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000320\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Support Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624000320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线评论在影响买家购买决策方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,以往的研究已经强调了在提供评论的买家中存在的自我选择偏差,这反过来又导致了评论评分分布的偏差。本研究旨在通过基于代理的建模,考虑两种产品差异:搜索和体验差异,以及纵向和横向差异,探索自我选择偏差对买家满意度的进一步影响。我们的研究结果表明,自我选择偏差会对在线评论在向买家提示产品质量(即评论效用)方面的作用产生不同程度的积极和消极影响,从而影响买家满意度。虽然在大多数情况下,自我选择偏差往往会降低评论效用,但有趣的是,它也会增加评论效用,因为除了正常的 "衡量 "功能外,它还能实现在线评论的 "筛选 "功能。我们还发现,自我选择偏差对买家满意度的不同影响取决于受审查产品的类型以及不同类型自我选择偏差的相互作用。这项研究引入了一种新的理论来解释自我选择偏差对买家满意度的影响,为现有的在线评论文献做出了宝贵的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How self-selection Bias in online reviews affects buyer satisfaction: A product type perspective

Online reviews play a crucial role in shaping buyers' purchase decisions. However, previous research has highlighted the existence of self-selection biases among buyers who contribute to reviews, which in turn leads to biased distributions of review ratings. This research aims to explore the further influences of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction through agent-based modeling, considering two product differentiations: search and experience differentiation, as well as vertical and horizontal differentiation. Our findings reveal that self-selection bias can have varying positive and negative effects on the usefulness of online reviews in suggesting product quality (i.e., review utility) to buyers, thus affecting buyer satisfaction. While self-selection bias tends to decrease review utility in most scenarios, interestingly, it can also increase review utility by enabling a “screening” function of online reviews in addition to its normal “measuring” function. We also find that the varying effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction are contingent upon the type of products under scrutiny and the interaction of different types of self-selection bias. This research makes valuable contributions to the existing literature on online reviews by introducing a novel theory to explain the effects of self-selection bias on buyer satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs).
期刊最新文献
What happens when platforms disclose the purchase history associated with product reviews? A comparative analysis of the effect of initiative risk statement versus passive risk disclosure on the financing performance of Kickstarter campaigns DeepSecure: A computational design science approach for interpretable threat hunting in cybersecurity decision making Editorial Board Effects of visual-preview and information-sidedness features on website persuasiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1