运动领域的一系列问题:苏珊-利-福斯特的 "抗议编舞 "与《戏剧舞蹈研究》杂志

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER THEATRE JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1353/tj.2023.a922212
Alison Bory, Ariel Nereson
{"title":"运动领域的一系列问题:苏珊-利-福斯特的 \"抗议编舞 \"与《戏剧舞蹈研究》杂志","authors":"Alison Bory, Ariel Nereson","doi":"10.1353/tj.2023.a922212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>In her landmark essay “Choreographies of Protest,” Susan Leigh Foster articulated the central concerns of the (at the time) developing field of dance studies. Foster’s following analysis, embedded in her argument about the compositional elements of social action, advanced core dance studies methodologies. On the occasion of the 75th anniversary of <i>Theatre Journal</i>, this essay revisits “Choreographies of Protest,” published in the October 2003 issue, and considers its significance to the fields of theatre, performance, and dance studies. Foster’s famous guiding questions that appeared in this essay, and which foregrounded real-world actions of the body, served to define the methodological approach and possibility of dance studies as a field, both concretizing the queries that previous scholarship had addressed and proposing what might be examined in years to come. In so doing, these seemingly straightforward queries, and the answers they elicit, begin to argue for dance studies as an essential discipline to the humanities, a way of understanding both human experience and human relations.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Set of Questions for a Field in Motion: Susan Leigh Foster's \\\"Choreographies of Protest\\\" and Dance Studies in Theatre Journal\",\"authors\":\"Alison Bory, Ariel Nereson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tj.2023.a922212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>In her landmark essay “Choreographies of Protest,” Susan Leigh Foster articulated the central concerns of the (at the time) developing field of dance studies. Foster’s following analysis, embedded in her argument about the compositional elements of social action, advanced core dance studies methodologies. On the occasion of the 75th anniversary of <i>Theatre Journal</i>, this essay revisits “Choreographies of Protest,” published in the October 2003 issue, and considers its significance to the fields of theatre, performance, and dance studies. Foster’s famous guiding questions that appeared in this essay, and which foregrounded real-world actions of the body, served to define the methodological approach and possibility of dance studies as a field, both concretizing the queries that previous scholarship had addressed and proposing what might be examined in years to come. In so doing, these seemingly straightforward queries, and the answers they elicit, begin to argue for dance studies as an essential discipline to the humanities, a way of understanding both human experience and human relations.</p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a922212\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a922212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:苏珊-利-福斯特(Susan Leigh Foster)在其具有里程碑意义的论文《抗议编舞》(Choreographies of Protest)中阐明了(当时)正在发展中的舞蹈研究领域的核心问题。福斯特的后续分析蕴含在她对社会行动构成要素的论证中,推进了舞蹈研究的核心方法论。值此《戏剧杂志》创刊 75 周年之际,本文重温了发表在 2003 年 10 月刊上的《抗议编舞》,并探讨了其对戏剧、表演和舞蹈研究领域的意义。福斯特在这篇文章中提出了著名的指导性问题,这些问题强调了身体在现实世界中的行动,有助于确定舞蹈研究作为一个领域的方法论方法和可能性,既具体化了之前学术界已经解决的问题,又提出了未来几年可能研究的问题。这样一来,这些看似简单明了的问题及其引出的答案开始论证舞蹈研究作为人文学科的一门重要学科,是理解人类经验和人类关系的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Set of Questions for a Field in Motion: Susan Leigh Foster's "Choreographies of Protest" and Dance Studies in Theatre Journal

Abstract:

In her landmark essay “Choreographies of Protest,” Susan Leigh Foster articulated the central concerns of the (at the time) developing field of dance studies. Foster’s following analysis, embedded in her argument about the compositional elements of social action, advanced core dance studies methodologies. On the occasion of the 75th anniversary of Theatre Journal, this essay revisits “Choreographies of Protest,” published in the October 2003 issue, and considers its significance to the fields of theatre, performance, and dance studies. Foster’s famous guiding questions that appeared in this essay, and which foregrounded real-world actions of the body, served to define the methodological approach and possibility of dance studies as a field, both concretizing the queries that previous scholarship had addressed and proposing what might be examined in years to come. In so doing, these seemingly straightforward queries, and the answers they elicit, begin to argue for dance studies as an essential discipline to the humanities, a way of understanding both human experience and human relations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
期刊最新文献
Stereophonic by David Adjmi (review) Natasha, Pierre & the Great Comet of 1812 by Dave Malloy (review) Byggmeister Solness by Henrik Ibsen (review) The Many Voices of Sissieretta Jones: Opera and the Sonic Necromancy of the Black Phonographic Archive National Arts Festival (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1