机场业务实践和治理形式对过剩产能的影响

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Transportation Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100353
Fecri Karanki, Volodymyr Bilotkach
{"title":"机场业务实践和治理形式对过剩产能的影响","authors":"Fecri Karanki,&nbsp;Volodymyr Bilotkach","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excess capacity poses a persistent challenge for airports as they often encounter lumpy capacity problems. The excess capacity is primarily influenced by factors such as uncertain demand, airline competition, airport pricing strategies, and the market structure of the airport industry. However, airport business practices also account for this issue. Using data from 59 U.S. airports between 2009 and 2019, we found that residual airports have less unused capacity than compensatory airports. This can be explained by the control of signatory airlines over the residual airports’ investment decisions and the lack of retained earnings under the residual agreement. We did not detect a significant difference in excess capacity between single-purpose and multipurpose governance forms. However, it is noteworthy that large hub airports exhibit higher capacity utilization compared to medium hub airports. Airports dominated by LCCs have higher capacity utilization rates, while the unused capacity remains consistent between cargo and non-cargo airports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of Airport business practices and governance forms on excess capacity\",\"authors\":\"Fecri Karanki,&nbsp;Volodymyr Bilotkach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Excess capacity poses a persistent challenge for airports as they often encounter lumpy capacity problems. The excess capacity is primarily influenced by factors such as uncertain demand, airline competition, airport pricing strategies, and the market structure of the airport industry. However, airport business practices also account for this issue. Using data from 59 U.S. airports between 2009 and 2019, we found that residual airports have less unused capacity than compensatory airports. This can be explained by the control of signatory airlines over the residual airports’ investment decisions and the lack of retained earnings under the residual agreement. We did not detect a significant difference in excess capacity between single-purpose and multipurpose governance forms. However, it is noteworthy that large hub airports exhibit higher capacity utilization compared to medium hub airports. Airports dominated by LCCs have higher capacity utilization rates, while the unused capacity remains consistent between cargo and non-cargo airports.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012224000121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012224000121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运力过剩是机场面临的一个长期挑战,因为机场经常会遇到运力不稳定的问题。运力过剩主要受需求不确定、航空公司竞争、机场定价策略以及机场行业市场结构等因素的影响。不过,机场的经营行为也是造成这一问题的原因之一。利用 2009 年至 2019 年期间 59 个美国机场的数据,我们发现剩余机场的未使用容量少于补偿机场。这可以解释为签约航空公司对剩余机场投资决策的控制,以及剩余协议缺乏留存收益。我们没有发现单一目的治理形式和多重目的治理形式在过剩容量方面存在显著差异。但值得注意的是,大型枢纽机场的运力利用率高于中型枢纽机场。以 LCC 为主导的机场拥有更高的容量利用率,而货运机场和非货运机场的未使用容量保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of Airport business practices and governance forms on excess capacity

Excess capacity poses a persistent challenge for airports as they often encounter lumpy capacity problems. The excess capacity is primarily influenced by factors such as uncertain demand, airline competition, airport pricing strategies, and the market structure of the airport industry. However, airport business practices also account for this issue. Using data from 59 U.S. airports between 2009 and 2019, we found that residual airports have less unused capacity than compensatory airports. This can be explained by the control of signatory airlines over the residual airports’ investment decisions and the lack of retained earnings under the residual agreement. We did not detect a significant difference in excess capacity between single-purpose and multipurpose governance forms. However, it is noteworthy that large hub airports exhibit higher capacity utilization compared to medium hub airports. Airports dominated by LCCs have higher capacity utilization rates, while the unused capacity remains consistent between cargo and non-cargo airports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Free rides to cleaner air? Examining the impact of massive public transport fare discounts on air quality Unionised dockworkers and port ownership structure in an international oligopoly Editorial Board Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities Pricing effects of code-sharing in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1