E.B. Faber , Y. Baca , J. Xiu , P. Walker , G. Manji , S. Gholami , A. Saeed , A. Prakash , G.P. Botta , D. Sohal , H.J. Lenz , A.F. Shields , C. Nabhan , W. El-Deiry , A. Seeber , V. Chiu , J. Hwang , E. Lou
{"title":"探讨胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的肿瘤微环境和免疫肿瘤学靶点在 KRAS 突变状态下的差异","authors":"E.B. Faber , Y. Baca , J. Xiu , P. Walker , G. Manji , S. Gholami , A. Saeed , A. Prakash , G.P. Botta , D. Sohal , H.J. Lenz , A.F. Shields , C. Nabhan , W. El-Deiry , A. Seeber , V. Chiu , J. Hwang , E. Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are driven by mutant (mt) <em>KRAS</em>. How mt <em>KRAS</em> and co-driver mutations affect the immune cell (IC) landscape of PDAC remains uncertain. Herein, we characterize the types of IC in the PDAC tumor microenvironment (TME) and the prevalence of immuno-oncologic (IO) biomarkers by genomic and transcriptomic analysis in the context of <em>KRAS</em> status.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>4142 PDAC and 3727 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases with <em>KRAS</em> mt were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Microsatellite instability and deficiency in mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found <em>KRAS</em> mt in 81% of PDAC, with the most common variant being <em>G12D</em> in PDAC, and fewer cases of <em>KRAS</em> mt were co-expressed with the predictive IO marker MSI-H/dMMR than <em>KRAS-</em>wild-type (wt). However, <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>G12D</em></sup>, <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>G12V</em></sup>, and <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>Q61</em></sup> mutations had significantly lower TMB than <em>KRAS</em> wt tumors in PDAC. The IC environment of <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC showed significant differences in nearly all IC types; a similar pattern was observed in CRC but was less pronounced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Therapeutic IO targets like programmed death-ligand 1 are enriched in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases harboring specific targetable variants of <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC. Better understanding of the TME could lead to tailored immunotherapeutic strategies to overcome these barriers in <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC, possibly in combination with molecularly targeted treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000037/pdfft?md5=f0e1f32ee3f35620dbf89352bc9d864d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000037-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the differences in the tumor microenvironment and immuno-oncologic targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) according to KRAS mutational status\",\"authors\":\"E.B. Faber , Y. Baca , J. Xiu , P. Walker , G. Manji , S. Gholami , A. Saeed , A. Prakash , G.P. Botta , D. Sohal , H.J. Lenz , A.F. Shields , C. Nabhan , W. El-Deiry , A. Seeber , V. Chiu , J. Hwang , E. Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are driven by mutant (mt) <em>KRAS</em>. How mt <em>KRAS</em> and co-driver mutations affect the immune cell (IC) landscape of PDAC remains uncertain. Herein, we characterize the types of IC in the PDAC tumor microenvironment (TME) and the prevalence of immuno-oncologic (IO) biomarkers by genomic and transcriptomic analysis in the context of <em>KRAS</em> status.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>4142 PDAC and 3727 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases with <em>KRAS</em> mt were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Microsatellite instability and deficiency in mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found <em>KRAS</em> mt in 81% of PDAC, with the most common variant being <em>G12D</em> in PDAC, and fewer cases of <em>KRAS</em> mt were co-expressed with the predictive IO marker MSI-H/dMMR than <em>KRAS-</em>wild-type (wt). However, <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>G12D</em></sup>, <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>G12V</em></sup>, and <em>KRAS</em><sup><em>Q61</em></sup> mutations had significantly lower TMB than <em>KRAS</em> wt tumors in PDAC. The IC environment of <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC showed significant differences in nearly all IC types; a similar pattern was observed in CRC but was less pronounced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Therapeutic IO targets like programmed death-ligand 1 are enriched in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases harboring specific targetable variants of <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC. Better understanding of the TME could lead to tailored immunotherapeutic strategies to overcome these barriers in <em>KRAS</em> mt PDAC, possibly in combination with molecularly targeted treatment strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000037/pdfft?md5=f0e1f32ee3f35620dbf89352bc9d864d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000037-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景大多数胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)由突变型(mt)KRAS驱动。mt KRAS和共同驱动基因突变如何影响PDAC的免疫细胞(IC)结构仍不确定。在此,我们结合 KRAS 状态,通过基因组和转录组分析,描述了 PDAC 肿瘤微环境(TME)中 IC 的类型以及免疫肿瘤(IO)生物标志物的流行情况。材料与方法使用新一代 DNA 测序、免疫组化和全转录组 RNA 测序分析了 4142 例 PDAC 和 3727 例 KRAS mt 结直肠癌(CRC)病例。结果我们在81%的PDAC中发现了KRAS mt,PDAC中最常见的变体是G12D,与KRAS-wild型(wt)相比,KRAS mt与预测性IO标记物MSI-H/dMMR共同表达的病例较少。然而,在PDAC中,KRASG12D、KRASG12V和KRASQ61突变的TMB明显低于KRAS wt肿瘤。KRAS mt PDAC 的 IC 环境在几乎所有 IC 类型中都显示出显著差异;在 CRC 中也观察到类似的模式,但不太明显。更好地了解TME,可以为KRAS mt PDAC制定量身定制的免疫治疗策略以克服这些障碍,也可能与分子靶向治疗策略相结合。
Exploring the differences in the tumor microenvironment and immuno-oncologic targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) according to KRAS mutational status
Background
The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are driven by mutant (mt) KRAS. How mt KRAS and co-driver mutations affect the immune cell (IC) landscape of PDAC remains uncertain. Herein, we characterize the types of IC in the PDAC tumor microenvironment (TME) and the prevalence of immuno-oncologic (IO) biomarkers by genomic and transcriptomic analysis in the context of KRAS status.
Materials and methods
4142 PDAC and 3727 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases with KRAS mt were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Microsatellite instability and deficiency in mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were also assessed.
Results
We found KRAS mt in 81% of PDAC, with the most common variant being G12D in PDAC, and fewer cases of KRAS mt were co-expressed with the predictive IO marker MSI-H/dMMR than KRAS-wild-type (wt). However, KRASG12D, KRASG12V, and KRASQ61 mutations had significantly lower TMB than KRAS wt tumors in PDAC. The IC environment of KRAS mt PDAC showed significant differences in nearly all IC types; a similar pattern was observed in CRC but was less pronounced.
Conclusions
Therapeutic IO targets like programmed death-ligand 1 are enriched in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases harboring specific targetable variants of KRAS mt PDAC. Better understanding of the TME could lead to tailored immunotherapeutic strategies to overcome these barriers in KRAS mt PDAC, possibly in combination with molecularly targeted treatment strategies.