Rivkah Ginat-Frolich , Eva Gilboa-Schechtman , Jonathan D. Huppert , Idan M. Aderka , Lynn E. Alden , Yair Bar-Haim , Eni S. Becker , Amit Bernstein , Ronny Geva , Richard G. Heimberg , Stefan G. Hofmann , Todd B. Kashdan , Ernst H.W. Koster , Joshua Lipsitz , Jon K. Maner , David A. Moscovitch , Pierre Philippot , Ronald M. Rapee , Karin Roelofs , Thomas L. Rodebaugh , Matthias J. Wieser
{"title":"社交焦虑的脆弱性:整合人内和人际视角","authors":"Rivkah Ginat-Frolich , Eva Gilboa-Schechtman , Jonathan D. Huppert , Idan M. Aderka , Lynn E. Alden , Yair Bar-Haim , Eni S. Becker , Amit Bernstein , Ronny Geva , Richard G. Heimberg , Stefan G. Hofmann , Todd B. Kashdan , Ernst H.W. Koster , Joshua Lipsitz , Jon K. Maner , David A. Moscovitch , Pierre Philippot , Ronald M. Rapee , Karin Roelofs , Thomas L. Rodebaugh , Matthias J. Wieser","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What are the major vulnerabilities in people with social anxiety? What are the most promising directions for translational research pertaining to this condition? The present paper provides an integrative summary of basic and applied translational research on social anxiety, emphasizing vulnerability factors. It is divided into two subsections: intrapersonal and interpersonal. The intrapersonal section synthesizes research relating to (a) self-representations and self-referential processes; (b) emotions and their regulation; and (c) cognitive biases: attention, interpretation and judgment, and memory. The interpersonal section summarizes findings regarding the systems of (a) approach and avoidance, (b) affiliation and social rank, and their implications for interpersonal impairments. Our review suggests that the science of social anxiety and, more generally, psychopathology may be advanced by examining processes and their underlying content within broad psychological systems. Increased interaction between basic and applied researchers to diversify and elaborate different perspectives on social anxiety is necessary for progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102415"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Rivkah Ginat-Frolich , Eva Gilboa-Schechtman , Jonathan D. Huppert , Idan M. Aderka , Lynn E. Alden , Yair Bar-Haim , Eni S. Becker , Amit Bernstein , Ronny Geva , Richard G. Heimberg , Stefan G. Hofmann , Todd B. Kashdan , Ernst H.W. Koster , Joshua Lipsitz , Jon K. Maner , David A. Moscovitch , Pierre Philippot , Ronald M. Rapee , Karin Roelofs , Thomas L. Rodebaugh , Matthias J. Wieser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>What are the major vulnerabilities in people with social anxiety? What are the most promising directions for translational research pertaining to this condition? The present paper provides an integrative summary of basic and applied translational research on social anxiety, emphasizing vulnerability factors. It is divided into two subsections: intrapersonal and interpersonal. The intrapersonal section synthesizes research relating to (a) self-representations and self-referential processes; (b) emotions and their regulation; and (c) cognitive biases: attention, interpretation and judgment, and memory. The interpersonal section summarizes findings regarding the systems of (a) approach and avoidance, (b) affiliation and social rank, and their implications for interpersonal impairments. Our review suggests that the science of social anxiety and, more generally, psychopathology may be advanced by examining processes and their underlying content within broad psychological systems. Increased interaction between basic and applied researchers to diversify and elaborate different perspectives on social anxiety is necessary for progress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000369\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives
What are the major vulnerabilities in people with social anxiety? What are the most promising directions for translational research pertaining to this condition? The present paper provides an integrative summary of basic and applied translational research on social anxiety, emphasizing vulnerability factors. It is divided into two subsections: intrapersonal and interpersonal. The intrapersonal section synthesizes research relating to (a) self-representations and self-referential processes; (b) emotions and their regulation; and (c) cognitive biases: attention, interpretation and judgment, and memory. The interpersonal section summarizes findings regarding the systems of (a) approach and avoidance, (b) affiliation and social rank, and their implications for interpersonal impairments. Our review suggests that the science of social anxiety and, more generally, psychopathology may be advanced by examining processes and their underlying content within broad psychological systems. Increased interaction between basic and applied researchers to diversify and elaborate different perspectives on social anxiety is necessary for progress.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.