支持学生进行自我反馈:对特刊的批判性思考

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348
Fabienne Michelle Van der Kleij
{"title":"支持学生进行自我反馈:对特刊的批判性思考","authors":"Fabienne Michelle Van der Kleij","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a commentary on articles in the special issue entitled “Instructional Tools and Curricular Structures to Facilitate Students’ Generation of Self-feedback.” The articles explored the value of a diverse range of potential sources of feedback from the student perspective. Collectively, these articles highlight the potential of instructional tools and assessment resources in supporting students to generate self-feedback. Studies in this special issue also contribute innovative solutions to enable sustainable and effective feedback practices at scale, capitalising on technological advances. Overall, the findings amplify the importance of explicitly providing appropriate frames of reference such as rubrics, exemplars, and annotated exemplars, to support the generation of meaningful self-feedback. However, further research that makes the nature of self-feedback visible is needed. To progress research on self-feedback, I highlight the need for a strategic research agenda, as well as more sophisticated theoretical frameworks and fit-for-purpose methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting students to generate self-feedback: Critical reflections on the special issue\",\"authors\":\"Fabienne Michelle Van der Kleij\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents a commentary on articles in the special issue entitled “Instructional Tools and Curricular Structures to Facilitate Students’ Generation of Self-feedback.” The articles explored the value of a diverse range of potential sources of feedback from the student perspective. Collectively, these articles highlight the potential of instructional tools and assessment resources in supporting students to generate self-feedback. Studies in this special issue also contribute innovative solutions to enable sustainable and effective feedback practices at scale, capitalising on technological advances. Overall, the findings amplify the importance of explicitly providing appropriate frames of reference such as rubrics, exemplars, and annotated exemplars, to support the generation of meaningful self-feedback. However, further research that makes the nature of self-feedback visible is needed. To progress research on self-feedback, I highlight the need for a strategic research agenda, as well as more sophisticated theoretical frameworks and fit-for-purpose methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对题为 "促进学生产生自我反馈的教学工具和课程结构 "的特刊中的文章进行了评论。这些文章从学生的角度探讨了各种潜在反馈来源的价值。这些文章共同强调了教学工具和评估资源在支持学生产生自我反馈方面的潜力。本特刊中的研究还提出了创新解决方案,以利用技术进步实现大规模的可持续有效反馈实践。总之,研究结果强调了明确提供适当参考框架的重要性,如评分标准、范例和注释范例,以支持生成有意义的自我反馈。不过,还需要进一步开展研究,使自我反馈的性质更加明显。为了推进自我反馈研究,我强调需要一个战略性的研究议程,以及更复杂的理论框架和适合目的的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting students to generate self-feedback: Critical reflections on the special issue

This article presents a commentary on articles in the special issue entitled “Instructional Tools and Curricular Structures to Facilitate Students’ Generation of Self-feedback.” The articles explored the value of a diverse range of potential sources of feedback from the student perspective. Collectively, these articles highlight the potential of instructional tools and assessment resources in supporting students to generate self-feedback. Studies in this special issue also contribute innovative solutions to enable sustainable and effective feedback practices at scale, capitalising on technological advances. Overall, the findings amplify the importance of explicitly providing appropriate frames of reference such as rubrics, exemplars, and annotated exemplars, to support the generation of meaningful self-feedback. However, further research that makes the nature of self-feedback visible is needed. To progress research on self-feedback, I highlight the need for a strategic research agenda, as well as more sophisticated theoretical frameworks and fit-for-purpose methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia Exploring the impact of student perceptions of Assessment for Learning on intrinsic motivation How are pre-service physical education teachers’ perceptions of educator-created (dis)empowering climates associated with their motivational processes and teaching intention? Online peer feedback training based on self-regulated learning in english as a foreign language writing: Perceived usefulness and students’ engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1