COVID-19 大流行对西班牙卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰地区妊娠糖尿病的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.005
Dulce M.ª Calderón Vicente , Amparo Marco Martínez , Inés Gómez García , Rosa Quílez Toboso , Iván Quiroga López , Manolo Delgado Rey , Javier Gargallo Vaamonde , María Olmos Alemán , Raquel Miralles Moragrega , César Gonzalvo Díaz , Javier González López , on behalf of the SCAMEND Group for the Study of Gestational Diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对西班牙卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰地区妊娠糖尿病的影响。","authors":"Dulce M.ª Calderón Vicente ,&nbsp;Amparo Marco Martínez ,&nbsp;Inés Gómez García ,&nbsp;Rosa Quílez Toboso ,&nbsp;Iván Quiroga López ,&nbsp;Manolo Delgado Rey ,&nbsp;Javier Gargallo Vaamonde ,&nbsp;María Olmos Alemán ,&nbsp;Raquel Miralles Moragrega ,&nbsp;César Gonzalvo Díaz ,&nbsp;Javier González López ,&nbsp;on behalf of the SCAMEND Group for the Study of Gestational Diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic","doi":"10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Subject-matter</h3><p>To assess the effect of the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on gestational diabetes (GDM).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>In this retrospective, multicentre, non-interventional study carried out in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, we compared 663 women with GDM exposed to the pandemic (pandemic group), with 622 women with GDM seen one year earlier (pre-pandemic group). The primary endpoint was a Large for Gestational Age (LGA) newborn as an indicator of poor GDM control. Secondary endpoints included obstetric and neonatal complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the pandemic, the gestational week at diagnosis (24.2 ± 7.4 vs 22.9 ± 7.7, p = 0.0016) and first visit to Endocrinology (26.6 ± 7.2 vs 25.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0014) were earlier. Face-to-face consultations were maintained in most cases (80.3%). The new diagnostic criteria for GDM were used in only 3% of cases. However, in the pandemic group, the final HbA1c was higher (5.2 ± 0.48 vs 5.29 ± 0.44%, p = 0.047) and there were more LGA newborns (8.5% vs 12.8%, p = 0.015). There were no differences in perinatal complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Care for GDM in our Public Health System did not significantly deteriorate during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this did not prevent a higher number of LGA newborns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48650,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","volume":"71 2","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gestational diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)\",\"authors\":\"Dulce M.ª Calderón Vicente ,&nbsp;Amparo Marco Martínez ,&nbsp;Inés Gómez García ,&nbsp;Rosa Quílez Toboso ,&nbsp;Iván Quiroga López ,&nbsp;Manolo Delgado Rey ,&nbsp;Javier Gargallo Vaamonde ,&nbsp;María Olmos Alemán ,&nbsp;Raquel Miralles Moragrega ,&nbsp;César Gonzalvo Díaz ,&nbsp;Javier González López ,&nbsp;on behalf of the SCAMEND Group for the Study of Gestational Diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Subject-matter</h3><p>To assess the effect of the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on gestational diabetes (GDM).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>In this retrospective, multicentre, non-interventional study carried out in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, we compared 663 women with GDM exposed to the pandemic (pandemic group), with 622 women with GDM seen one year earlier (pre-pandemic group). The primary endpoint was a Large for Gestational Age (LGA) newborn as an indicator of poor GDM control. Secondary endpoints included obstetric and neonatal complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the pandemic, the gestational week at diagnosis (24.2 ± 7.4 vs 22.9 ± 7.7, p = 0.0016) and first visit to Endocrinology (26.6 ± 7.2 vs 25.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0014) were earlier. Face-to-face consultations were maintained in most cases (80.3%). The new diagnostic criteria for GDM were used in only 3% of cases. However, in the pandemic group, the final HbA1c was higher (5.2 ± 0.48 vs 5.29 ± 0.44%, p = 0.047) and there were more LGA newborns (8.5% vs 12.8%, p = 0.015). There were no differences in perinatal complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Care for GDM in our Public Health System did not significantly deteriorate during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this did not prevent a higher number of LGA newborns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530018024000209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530018024000209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究对象:妊娠糖尿病(GDM):评估2019年冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行对妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的影响:在这项在西班牙卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰进行的多中心、非干预性回顾性研究中,我们对663名妊娠糖尿病妇女(大流行组)和622名一年前妊娠糖尿病妇女(大流行前组)进行了比较。主要终点是新生儿妊娠年龄偏大(LGA),以此作为 GDM 控制不佳的指标。次要终点包括产科和新生儿并发症:在大流行期间,诊断时的孕周(24.2 ± 7.4 vs 22.9 ± 7.7,p = 0.0016)和首次到内分泌科就诊的时间(26.6 ± 7.2 vs 25.3 ± 7.6,p = 0.0014)都提前了。大多数病例(80.3%)保持了面对面咨询。只有 3% 的病例使用了 GDM 的新诊断标准。然而,在大流行组中,最终的 HbA1c 更高(5.2 ± 0.48 vs 5.29 ± 0.44%,p = 0.047),而且 LGA 新生儿更多(8.5% vs 12.8%,p = 0.015)。围产期并发症方面没有差异:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我国公共卫生系统对 GDM 的护理并没有明显恶化。结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们的公共卫生系统对 GDM 的护理并没有明显恶化,但这并不能阻止 LGA 新生儿数量的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gestational diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)

Subject-matter

To assess the effect of the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on gestational diabetes (GDM).

Material and methods

In this retrospective, multicentre, non-interventional study carried out in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, we compared 663 women with GDM exposed to the pandemic (pandemic group), with 622 women with GDM seen one year earlier (pre-pandemic group). The primary endpoint was a Large for Gestational Age (LGA) newborn as an indicator of poor GDM control. Secondary endpoints included obstetric and neonatal complications.

Results

During the pandemic, the gestational week at diagnosis (24.2 ± 7.4 vs 22.9 ± 7.7, p = 0.0016) and first visit to Endocrinology (26.6 ± 7.2 vs 25.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0014) were earlier. Face-to-face consultations were maintained in most cases (80.3%). The new diagnostic criteria for GDM were used in only 3% of cases. However, in the pandemic group, the final HbA1c was higher (5.2 ± 0.48 vs 5.29 ± 0.44%, p = 0.047) and there were more LGA newborns (8.5% vs 12.8%, p = 0.015). There were no differences in perinatal complications.

Conclusions

Care for GDM in our Public Health System did not significantly deteriorate during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this did not prevent a higher number of LGA newborns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Diabetes (Sociedad Española de Diabetes, SED), and was founded in 1954. The aim of the journal is to improve knowledge and be a useful tool in practice for clinical and laboratory specialists, trainee physicians, researchers, and nurses interested in endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and related disciplines. It is an international journal published in Spanish (print and online) and English (online), covering different fields of endocrinology and metabolism, including diabetes, obesity, and nutrition disorders, as well as the most relevant research produced mainly in Spanish language territories. The quality of the contents is ensured by a prestigious national and international board, and by a selected panel of specialists involved in a rigorous peer review. The result is that only manuscripts containing high quality research and with utmost interest for clinicians and professionals related in the field are published. The Journal publishes Original clinical and research articles, Reviews, Special articles, Clinical Guidelines, Position Statements from both societies and Letters to the editor. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición can be found at Science Citation Index Expanded, Medline/PubMed and SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Are we underdiagnosing cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Automated insulin delivery systems in the treatment of diabetes: Benefits, challenges, and practical considerations in pediatric patients. Phase angle: Differences between disease-related malnutrition, obesity and healthy people. Early thyroid carcinoma in PTEN syndrome. Importance of immediate ultrasound screening. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of benign thyroid nodules: Efficacy and impact on quality of life of percutaneous ethanol injection. Results from a high-resolution thyroid nodule unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1