暴露前预防使用者的性传播感染发生率和筛查模式。

Oskar Ayerdi, Eva Orviz, Adrián Valls Carbó, Nuria Fernández Piñeiro, Mar Vera García, Teresa Puerta López, Juan Ballesteros Martín, Carmen Rodríguez Martín, Begoña Baza Caraciolo, Clara Lejarraga Cañas, Jorge-Alfredo Pérez-García, Dulce Carrió, Mónica García Lotero, María Ferreras Forcada, Montserrat González Polo, Montserrat Raposo Utrilla, Alberto Delgado-Iribarren, Jorge Del Romero-Guerrero, Vicente Estrada Pérez
{"title":"暴露前预防使用者的性传播感染发生率和筛查模式。","authors":"Oskar Ayerdi, Eva Orviz, Adrián Valls Carbó, Nuria Fernández Piñeiro, Mar Vera García, Teresa Puerta López, Juan Ballesteros Martín, Carmen Rodríguez Martín, Begoña Baza Caraciolo, Clara Lejarraga Cañas, Jorge-Alfredo Pérez-García, Dulce Carrió, Mónica García Lotero, María Ferreras Forcada, Montserrat González Polo, Montserrat Raposo Utrilla, Alberto Delgado-Iribarren, Jorge Del Romero-Guerrero, Vicente Estrada Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is discussion about the frequency of STI screening among pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence of STIs and to evaluate different screening models in order to optimise the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 138 PrEP users in a STI clinic. Participants were tested for STIs every three months. Unscheduled visits were performed for those with STI-related symptoms or for people who were notified for an STI by a sexual partner. We performed a survival analysis of repeated events, estimating the cumulative incidence (CI) and incidence rate (IR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall CI by quarterly screening was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.6-9.1) infections per person over six years, with a decreasing trend. The most frequently diagnosed pathogen was Neisseria gonorrhoeae, with a IR of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.84). If the frequency of screening is reduced to every six months, the IR of STIs is reduced by (95% CI: 0.5-0.66) infections per user per year, and at 12 months by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89). In the case of no pharyngeal or urethral screening, IR is reduced by 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32-0.42) infections per person per year and in those over 35 years of age by 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.4). Eliminating unscheduled visits, the reduction in IR is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of STIs among PrEP users is high, especially in the rectum, but it does not increase over time. STI screening could be optimised reducing the frequency of pharyngeal and urethral testing, particularly in those over 35 years of age. It is essential to redistribute health resources for unscheduled visits, which have been shown to be the most cost-effective screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of sexually transmitted infections and screening models among pre-exposure prophylaxis users.\",\"authors\":\"Oskar Ayerdi, Eva Orviz, Adrián Valls Carbó, Nuria Fernández Piñeiro, Mar Vera García, Teresa Puerta López, Juan Ballesteros Martín, Carmen Rodríguez Martín, Begoña Baza Caraciolo, Clara Lejarraga Cañas, Jorge-Alfredo Pérez-García, Dulce Carrió, Mónica García Lotero, María Ferreras Forcada, Montserrat González Polo, Montserrat Raposo Utrilla, Alberto Delgado-Iribarren, Jorge Del Romero-Guerrero, Vicente Estrada Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is discussion about the frequency of STI screening among pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence of STIs and to evaluate different screening models in order to optimise the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 138 PrEP users in a STI clinic. Participants were tested for STIs every three months. Unscheduled visits were performed for those with STI-related symptoms or for people who were notified for an STI by a sexual partner. We performed a survival analysis of repeated events, estimating the cumulative incidence (CI) and incidence rate (IR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall CI by quarterly screening was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.6-9.1) infections per person over six years, with a decreasing trend. The most frequently diagnosed pathogen was Neisseria gonorrhoeae, with a IR of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.84). If the frequency of screening is reduced to every six months, the IR of STIs is reduced by (95% CI: 0.5-0.66) infections per user per year, and at 12 months by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89). In the case of no pharyngeal or urethral screening, IR is reduced by 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32-0.42) infections per person per year and in those over 35 years of age by 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.4). Eliminating unscheduled visits, the reduction in IR is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of STIs among PrEP users is high, especially in the rectum, but it does not increase over time. STI screening could be optimised reducing the frequency of pharyngeal and urethral testing, particularly in those over 35 years of age. It is essential to redistribute health resources for unscheduled visits, which have been shown to be the most cost-effective screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2024.03.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2024.03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:关于暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)使用者中性传播感染筛查频率的讨论不绝于耳。本研究旨在分析性传播感染的发病率,并评估不同的筛查模式,以优化随访:在 2017 年至 2023 年期间开展了一项前瞻性研究,研究对象包括性传播感染诊所的 138 名 PrEP 使用者。参与者每三个月接受一次性传播感染检测。对出现性传播感染相关症状或被性伴侣告知患有性传播感染的人进行了不定期就诊。我们对重复事件进行了生存分析,估计了累积发病率(CI)和发病率(IR):结果:通过季度筛查,六年内每人的总体感染率为 8.3(95% CI:7.6-9.1),呈下降趋势。最常见的病原体是淋病奈瑟菌,感染率为 0.76(95% CI:0.68-0.84)。如果将筛查频率降低到每六个月一次,则每名用户每年的性传播感染 IR 会降低(95% CI:0.5-0.66),12 个月时的感染 IR 会降低 0.82(95% CI:0.73-0.89)。在不进行咽部或尿道筛查的情况下,每人每年的 IR 感染率降低 0.37(95% CI:0.32-0.42),35 岁以上的感染率降低 0.33(95% CI:0.25-0.4)。剔除计划外就诊,IR 的降低幅度为 0.33(95% CI:0.24-0.42):结论:PrEP 使用者的性传播感染发病率很高,尤其是直肠,但并没有随着时间的推移而增加。可以优化性传播感染筛查,减少咽部和尿道检测频率,尤其是 35 岁以上人群。必须重新分配卫生资源,用于计划外就诊,这已被证明是最具成本效益的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of sexually transmitted infections and screening models among pre-exposure prophylaxis users.

Introduction: There is discussion about the frequency of STI screening among pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence of STIs and to evaluate different screening models in order to optimise the follow-up.

Methodology: A prospective study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 138 PrEP users in a STI clinic. Participants were tested for STIs every three months. Unscheduled visits were performed for those with STI-related symptoms or for people who were notified for an STI by a sexual partner. We performed a survival analysis of repeated events, estimating the cumulative incidence (CI) and incidence rate (IR).

Results: The overall CI by quarterly screening was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.6-9.1) infections per person over six years, with a decreasing trend. The most frequently diagnosed pathogen was Neisseria gonorrhoeae, with a IR of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.84). If the frequency of screening is reduced to every six months, the IR of STIs is reduced by (95% CI: 0.5-0.66) infections per user per year, and at 12 months by 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89). In the case of no pharyngeal or urethral screening, IR is reduced by 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32-0.42) infections per person per year and in those over 35 years of age by 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25-0.4). Eliminating unscheduled visits, the reduction in IR is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.42).

Conclusions: The incidence of STIs among PrEP users is high, especially in the rectum, but it does not increase over time. STI screening could be optimised reducing the frequency of pharyngeal and urethral testing, particularly in those over 35 years of age. It is essential to redistribute health resources for unscheduled visits, which have been shown to be the most cost-effective screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of wound infections among patients injured during the Ruso-Ukrainian war in a Role 4 hospital. Systemic bartonellosis with hepatosplenic granulomas. Reply to "Characterization of wound infections among patients injured during the Ruso-Ukrainian war in a Role 4 hospital". Tuberculous meningitis due to Mycobacterium africanum in Spain, a case report. Trend of pediatric leprosy in an endemic area in Northeast of Brazil, 2008-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1