结合使用氢气和富氢溶液并不能防止兔子缺血性脊髓损伤。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4
Atsuo Yamashita, Takehiko Fukui, Satoshi Yamashita, Kazuyoshi Ishida, Mishiya Matsumoto
{"title":"结合使用氢气和富氢溶液并不能防止兔子缺血性脊髓损伤。","authors":"Atsuo Yamashita, Takehiko Fukui, Satoshi Yamashita, Kazuyoshi Ishida, Mishiya Matsumoto","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the combination of H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation and administration of hydrogen-rich acetated Ringer's solution (HS) could protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Experiment 1, rabbits were randomly assigned to a 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas group, HS group, 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas + HS group (combination group), or control group (n = 6 per group). The H<sub>2</sub> concentration of HS was 0.65 mM. H<sub>2</sub> was inhaled for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion. HS (20 mL/kg) was divided into six bolus injections at 10-min intervals, starting 5 min before reperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia was produced by occluding the abdominal aorta for 15 min. Neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed 7 days after reperfusion. In Experiment 2, H<sub>2</sub> concentrations in spinal cord tissue according to the administration of 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas or HS were compared by measuring the electric current through a platinum needle electrode (n = 2). In Experiment 3, rabbits were assigned to a 2% H<sub>2</sub> gas group or control group (n = 6 per group). Spinal cord ischemia was produced and neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed as in Experiment 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences among the groups in the neurologic and histopathologic outcomes in Experiments 1 and 3. Bolus administration of HS (10 mL) transiently increased the current to only 1/30th and 1/27th of the plateau current with 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation in two animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the combination of 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation and administration of a hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury and that the increase in H<sub>2</sub> concentration in spinal cord tissue after administration of HS is very low compared to 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"455-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of hydrogen gas and hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.\",\"authors\":\"Atsuo Yamashita, Takehiko Fukui, Satoshi Yamashita, Kazuyoshi Ishida, Mishiya Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the combination of H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation and administration of hydrogen-rich acetated Ringer's solution (HS) could protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Experiment 1, rabbits were randomly assigned to a 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas group, HS group, 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas + HS group (combination group), or control group (n = 6 per group). The H<sub>2</sub> concentration of HS was 0.65 mM. H<sub>2</sub> was inhaled for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion. HS (20 mL/kg) was divided into six bolus injections at 10-min intervals, starting 5 min before reperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia was produced by occluding the abdominal aorta for 15 min. Neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed 7 days after reperfusion. In Experiment 2, H<sub>2</sub> concentrations in spinal cord tissue according to the administration of 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas or HS were compared by measuring the electric current through a platinum needle electrode (n = 2). In Experiment 3, rabbits were assigned to a 2% H<sub>2</sub> gas group or control group (n = 6 per group). Spinal cord ischemia was produced and neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed as in Experiment 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences among the groups in the neurologic and histopathologic outcomes in Experiments 1 and 3. Bolus administration of HS (10 mL) transiently increased the current to only 1/30th and 1/27th of the plateau current with 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation in two animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the combination of 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation and administration of a hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury and that the increase in H<sub>2</sub> concentration in spinal cord tissue after administration of HS is very low compared to 1.2% H<sub>2</sub> gas inhalation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03334-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定吸入 H2 气体和注射富氢醋酸林格氏液(HS)是否能保护兔子免受缺血性脊髓损伤:在实验 1 中,兔子被随机分配到 1.2% H2 气体组、HS 组、1.2% H2 气体 + HS 组(混合组)或对照组(每组 6 只)。HS 的 H2 浓度为 0.65 mM。在再灌注前 5 分钟开始吸入 H2,持续 60 分钟。从再灌注前 5 分钟开始,每隔 10 分钟注射一次 HS(20 mL/kg),共注射 6 次。脊髓缺血是通过闭塞腹主动脉 15 分钟产生的。再灌注 7 天后进行神经学和组织病理学评估。在实验 2 中,通过测量铂针电极(n = 2)上的电流,比较了施用 1.2% H2 气体或 HS 后脊髓组织中的 H2 浓度。在实验 3 中,兔子被分配到 2% H2 气体组或对照组(每组 6 只)。与实验 1 一样,进行脊髓缺血和神经学及组织病理学评估:结果:在实验 1 和实验 3 中,各组的神经学和组织病理学结果无明显差异。两只动物在吸入 1.2% H2 气体后,注射 HS(10 mL)可使电流瞬时增加到仅为高原电流的 1/30 和 1/27:这些结果表明,同时吸入 1.2% 的 H2 气体和给予富氢溶液并不能保护缺血性脊髓损伤,而且与吸入 1.2% 的 H2 气体相比,给予 HS 后脊髓组织中 H2 浓度的增加非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The combination of hydrogen gas and hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the combination of H2 gas inhalation and administration of hydrogen-rich acetated Ringer's solution (HS) could protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits.

Methods: In Experiment 1, rabbits were randomly assigned to a 1.2% H2 gas group, HS group, 1.2% H2 gas + HS group (combination group), or control group (n = 6 per group). The H2 concentration of HS was 0.65 mM. H2 was inhaled for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion. HS (20 mL/kg) was divided into six bolus injections at 10-min intervals, starting 5 min before reperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia was produced by occluding the abdominal aorta for 15 min. Neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed 7 days after reperfusion. In Experiment 2, H2 concentrations in spinal cord tissue according to the administration of 1.2% H2 gas or HS were compared by measuring the electric current through a platinum needle electrode (n = 2). In Experiment 3, rabbits were assigned to a 2% H2 gas group or control group (n = 6 per group). Spinal cord ischemia was produced and neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed as in Experiment 1.

Results: There were no significant differences among the groups in the neurologic and histopathologic outcomes in Experiments 1 and 3. Bolus administration of HS (10 mL) transiently increased the current to only 1/30th and 1/27th of the plateau current with 1.2% H2 gas inhalation in two animals.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the combination of 1.2% H2 gas inhalation and administration of a hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury and that the increase in H2 concentration in spinal cord tissue after administration of HS is very low compared to 1.2% H2 gas inhalation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia. Advantages of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. McGRATH MAC size 1 vs. 2 blades: infant intubation time. Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study. Vasopressors against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1