后踝骨骨折最佳手术固定的启示。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1
Yu-Cheng Su, Ying-Yu Wang, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chih-Wei Chang, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chien-An Shih
{"title":"后踝骨骨折最佳手术固定的启示。","authors":"Yu-Cheng Su, Ying-Yu Wang, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chih-Wei Chang, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chien-An Shih","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Cheng Su, Ying-Yu Wang, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chih-Wei Chang, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chien-An Shih\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:后踝骨折是一种常见的踝关节创伤,其最佳治疗方法对于改善预后至关重要。然而,关于最有效的手术方法,尤其是螺钉和钢板固定方法之间的差异,仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨这些固定技术在治疗效果上的差异:我们对比较前后(A-P)螺钉、后前(P-A)螺钉和钢板固定的临床试验进行了全面回顾。两名研究人员对来自多个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science)的数据进行了验证。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们使用视觉模拟量表和美国骨科足踝评分(AOFAS)作为主要结果进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)。次要结果包括活动范围限制、放射学结果和并发症发生率:结果:NMA 包括 13 项研究,其中包括 4 项随机试验和 8 项回顾性试验。根据基于累积排名曲线的表面排名,A-P螺钉在AOFAS改善率方面排名最高,在感染和腓肠神经损伤发生率方面排名最低。而 P-A 螺钉在改善 VAS 评分方面表现突出。相反,后托板固定在骨关节炎分级进展、术后关节台阶脱位≥2 mm、非关节挛缩和踝关节外展度丧失≥5°方面的发生率最低,但在大多数其他临床结果方面表现不佳:NMA表明,开放式钢板固定更有可能提供更好的放射学结果,而螺钉固定则更有可能提供更好的功能和疼痛结果。尽管如此,临床医生仍应考虑碎片大小和骨折形态,权衡刚性生物力学固定的优势和软组织损伤的可能性,以优化治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.

Aims: The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.

Results: The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Ten-year clinical and radiological outcomes with a vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cup. Large variability in degree of constraint of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty liners between different implant systems. Robotic-navigated spinal decompression procedures: the next frontier. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted lumbar laminectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1