心理治疗的实践和培训模式:来自意大利和加拿大的跨国视角。

Victoria Klimkowski, Sofia McRae, Alexia Blick, Laurence Beaulieu, J Reese S Handley, Anara A Hopley, Caroline A Hyde, Devika M Jain, Sylvia Kolodziejczyk, Josiane Laliberté, Alexa Lévesque, Lara M Masri, Anya M Monet, Reagan S Nediu, Rachel Valihrach, Giorgio Tasca
{"title":"心理治疗的实践和培训模式:来自意大利和加拿大的跨国视角。","authors":"Victoria Klimkowski, Sofia McRae, Alexia Blick, Laurence Beaulieu, J Reese S Handley, Anara A Hopley, Caroline A Hyde, Devika M Jain, Sylvia Kolodziejczyk, Josiane Laliberté, Alexa Lévesque, Lara M Masri, Anya M Monet, Reagan S Nediu, Rachel Valihrach, Giorgio Tasca","doi":"10.4081/ripppo.2024.732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internationally, there is ongoing concern about accessibility to mental health care and training. The goal of this study was to explore commonalities and differences within models of clinical psychology and psychotherapy in Ontario, Canada, and Lombardia, Italy, respectively, to inform improvements to the accessibility of mental health care and training. Using key informant sampling, we recruited ten students and professionals in Italy and Canada who study or work in psychology for semi-structured interviews. We analyzed the interview content using an inductive approach for thematic analysis within countries and meta-theme analysis across countries. The findings indicated three cross-national meta-themes: the need to integrate evidence with practice, the limited accessibility of training for students and treatment for patients, and the importance of the quality of training programs. Despite some differences regarding the amount of scientific training, personal therapy for trainees, and the prominence of cultural diversity training, Canadian and Italian psychology professionals and students shared experiences of psychotherapy practice and clinical psychology training. The three cross-national meta-themes indicate which issues in training and practice may be relevant worldwide and where to focus resources. The findings can inform international collaborations regarding training model structures that may increase access to psychology training and may increase consensus on professional recognition standards to improve mobility for professionals. These changes could reduce barriers to mental healthcare services for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44262,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of practice and training in psychotherapy: cross-national perspectives from Italy and Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Klimkowski, Sofia McRae, Alexia Blick, Laurence Beaulieu, J Reese S Handley, Anara A Hopley, Caroline A Hyde, Devika M Jain, Sylvia Kolodziejczyk, Josiane Laliberté, Alexa Lévesque, Lara M Masri, Anya M Monet, Reagan S Nediu, Rachel Valihrach, Giorgio Tasca\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ripppo.2024.732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Internationally, there is ongoing concern about accessibility to mental health care and training. The goal of this study was to explore commonalities and differences within models of clinical psychology and psychotherapy in Ontario, Canada, and Lombardia, Italy, respectively, to inform improvements to the accessibility of mental health care and training. Using key informant sampling, we recruited ten students and professionals in Italy and Canada who study or work in psychology for semi-structured interviews. We analyzed the interview content using an inductive approach for thematic analysis within countries and meta-theme analysis across countries. The findings indicated three cross-national meta-themes: the need to integrate evidence with practice, the limited accessibility of training for students and treatment for patients, and the importance of the quality of training programs. Despite some differences regarding the amount of scientific training, personal therapy for trainees, and the prominence of cultural diversity training, Canadian and Italian psychology professionals and students shared experiences of psychotherapy practice and clinical psychology training. The three cross-national meta-themes indicate which issues in training and practice may be relevant worldwide and where to focus resources. The findings can inform international collaborations regarding training model structures that may increase access to psychology training and may increase consensus on professional recognition standards to improve mobility for professionals. These changes could reduce barriers to mental healthcare services for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064771/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2024.732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2024.732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际上,心理健康护理和培训的可及性问题一直备受关注。本研究旨在探讨加拿大安大略省和意大利伦巴第大区的临床心理学和心理治疗模式的共性和差异,为改善心理健康护理和培训的可及性提供参考。通过关键信息抽样,我们在意大利和加拿大招募了十名学习或从事心理学工作的学生和专业人士,对他们进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用归纳法对访谈内容进行了国内主题分析和跨国元主题分析。研究结果显示了三个跨国元主题:将证据与实践相结合的必要性、学生接受培训和患者接受治疗的机会有限以及培训项目质量的重要性。尽管在科学培训的数量、受训者的个人治疗以及文化多样性培训的重要性方面存在一些差异,但加拿大和意大利的心理学专业人士和学生在心理治疗实践和临床心理学培训方面有着共同的经验。这三个跨国元主题表明了培训和实践中的哪些问题可能与全球相关,以及应在哪些方面集中资源。研究结果可以为培训模式结构方面的国际合作提供信息,从而增加接受心理学培训的机会,并就专业认证标准达成更多共识,以提高专业人员的流动性。这些变化可以减少患者获得心理保健服务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Models of practice and training in psychotherapy: cross-national perspectives from Italy and Canada.

Internationally, there is ongoing concern about accessibility to mental health care and training. The goal of this study was to explore commonalities and differences within models of clinical psychology and psychotherapy in Ontario, Canada, and Lombardia, Italy, respectively, to inform improvements to the accessibility of mental health care and training. Using key informant sampling, we recruited ten students and professionals in Italy and Canada who study or work in psychology for semi-structured interviews. We analyzed the interview content using an inductive approach for thematic analysis within countries and meta-theme analysis across countries. The findings indicated three cross-national meta-themes: the need to integrate evidence with practice, the limited accessibility of training for students and treatment for patients, and the importance of the quality of training programs. Despite some differences regarding the amount of scientific training, personal therapy for trainees, and the prominence of cultural diversity training, Canadian and Italian psychology professionals and students shared experiences of psychotherapy practice and clinical psychology training. The three cross-national meta-themes indicate which issues in training and practice may be relevant worldwide and where to focus resources. The findings can inform international collaborations regarding training model structures that may increase access to psychology training and may increase consensus on professional recognition standards to improve mobility for professionals. These changes could reduce barriers to mental healthcare services for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and self-compassion in patients with major depressive disorder: the mediating role of the avoidant attachment type. The role of suicidal motivations in adolescence: implications for the psychotherapeutic treatment of suicidal risk. The problem of suicidality, personality disorder, and treatment: an alternative psycho-social perspective. Does technique matter? A multilevel meta-analysis on the association between psychotherapeutic techniques and outcome. The person behind the therapist: a recall study on significant events that contribute to therapists' personal and professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1