移动推式与拉式目标定位和地理查询

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.0206
Dominik Molitor, Martin Spann, Anindya Ghose, Philipp Reichhart
{"title":"移动推式与拉式目标定位和地理查询","authors":"Dominik Molitor, Martin Spann, Anindya Ghose, Philipp Reichhart","doi":"10.1287/isre.2021.0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms have two distinct options when delivering content to consumers’ mobile devices: mobile push and mobile pull. Mobile push delivers firm-initiated (ad) content directly to consumers, while mobile pull requires consumers to initiate requests for (ad) content. This study tests the impact of mobile push and mobile pull on consumers’ coupon redemption behavior in a large-scale randomized field experiment in a geo-conquesting setting, targeting customers located around competitor retail stores with mobile coupons to drive them to stores of the focal retailer. The results show that mobile push increases coupon redemption rates by 6.0%, with substantial heterogeneity based on app-specific use experience and store density: App-specific use experience negatively moderates the effect of mobile push delivery on redemptions, likely because both usage experience and push notifications reduce app-specific search costs, thereby acting as substitutes for one another. In areas with higher store density, the positive effect of mobile push delivery on the redemption likelihood is greater, suggesting that push notifications can highlight the focal coupon among alternative store choices, thereby reducing consumer switching costs. These findings have important implications for retailers and brands in creating competitive mobile targeting campaigns that effectively leverage both mobile push and pull delivery mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Push vs. Pull Targeting and Geo-Conquesting\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Molitor, Martin Spann, Anindya Ghose, Philipp Reichhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/isre.2021.0206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firms have two distinct options when delivering content to consumers’ mobile devices: mobile push and mobile pull. Mobile push delivers firm-initiated (ad) content directly to consumers, while mobile pull requires consumers to initiate requests for (ad) content. This study tests the impact of mobile push and mobile pull on consumers’ coupon redemption behavior in a large-scale randomized field experiment in a geo-conquesting setting, targeting customers located around competitor retail stores with mobile coupons to drive them to stores of the focal retailer. The results show that mobile push increases coupon redemption rates by 6.0%, with substantial heterogeneity based on app-specific use experience and store density: App-specific use experience negatively moderates the effect of mobile push delivery on redemptions, likely because both usage experience and push notifications reduce app-specific search costs, thereby acting as substitutes for one another. In areas with higher store density, the positive effect of mobile push delivery on the redemption likelihood is greater, suggesting that push notifications can highlight the focal coupon among alternative store choices, thereby reducing consumer switching costs. These findings have important implications for retailers and brands in creating competitive mobile targeting campaigns that effectively leverage both mobile push and pull delivery mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0206\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业在向消费者的移动设备提供内容时有两种不同的选择:移动推送和移动拉动。移动推送将企业发起的(广告)内容直接发送给消费者,而移动拉动则需要消费者主动请求(广告)内容。本研究通过大规模随机现场实验,测试了移动推送和移动拉动对消费者兑换优惠券行为的影响,实验以地理位置为背景,针对竞争对手零售店周围的顾客发放移动优惠券,将他们引向重点零售商的零售店。实验结果表明,移动推送使优惠券兑换率提高了 6.0%,而应用程序的特定使用体验和商店密度会产生很大的异质性:特定应用的使用体验会对移动推送对兑换率的影响产生负面调节作用,这可能是因为使用体验和推送通知都会降低特定应用的搜索成本,从而起到相互替代的作用。在商店密度较高的地区,手机推送对兑换可能性的积极影响更大,这表明推送通知可以在其他商店选择中突出重点优惠券,从而降低消费者的转换成本。这些研究结果对于零售商和品牌商有效利用移动推送和拉动式投放机制,创建具有竞争力的移动目标营销活动具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile Push vs. Pull Targeting and Geo-Conquesting
Firms have two distinct options when delivering content to consumers’ mobile devices: mobile push and mobile pull. Mobile push delivers firm-initiated (ad) content directly to consumers, while mobile pull requires consumers to initiate requests for (ad) content. This study tests the impact of mobile push and mobile pull on consumers’ coupon redemption behavior in a large-scale randomized field experiment in a geo-conquesting setting, targeting customers located around competitor retail stores with mobile coupons to drive them to stores of the focal retailer. The results show that mobile push increases coupon redemption rates by 6.0%, with substantial heterogeneity based on app-specific use experience and store density: App-specific use experience negatively moderates the effect of mobile push delivery on redemptions, likely because both usage experience and push notifications reduce app-specific search costs, thereby acting as substitutes for one another. In areas with higher store density, the positive effect of mobile push delivery on the redemption likelihood is greater, suggesting that push notifications can highlight the focal coupon among alternative store choices, thereby reducing consumer switching costs. These findings have important implications for retailers and brands in creating competitive mobile targeting campaigns that effectively leverage both mobile push and pull delivery mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
Win by Hook or Crook? Self-Injecting Favorable Online Reviews to Fight Adjacent Rivals Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers Timely Quality Problem Resolution in Peer-Production Systems: The Impact of Bots, Policy Citations, and Contributor Experience Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement How to Make My Bug Bounty Cost-Effective? A Game-Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1