学术自由是否保护教学自主权?

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1353/rhe.0.a922661
Scott Gelber
{"title":"学术自由是否保护教学自主权?","authors":"Scott Gelber","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.a922661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have analyzed debates about controversial faculty speech inside and outside of the classroom, but none have paid close attention to the facet of academic freedom related to professors’ decisions about daily teaching methods. This omission, along with obstacles to enacting pedagogical norms, has caused the scholarly community to overlook the manner in which academic freedom entails collective supervision of teaching. By viewing instructional choices through the prism of academic freedom, this essay encourages faculty members to engage with the scholarship of teaching in a manner that is similar to how we consult disciplinary literature when conducting research or determining course content.</p>","PeriodicalId":47732,"journal":{"name":"Review of Higher Education","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Academic Freedom Protect Pedagogical Autonomy?\",\"authors\":\"Scott Gelber\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rhe.0.a922661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Scholars have analyzed debates about controversial faculty speech inside and outside of the classroom, but none have paid close attention to the facet of academic freedom related to professors’ decisions about daily teaching methods. This omission, along with obstacles to enacting pedagogical norms, has caused the scholarly community to overlook the manner in which academic freedom entails collective supervision of teaching. By viewing instructional choices through the prism of academic freedom, this essay encourages faculty members to engage with the scholarship of teaching in a manner that is similar to how we consult disciplinary literature when conducting research or determining course content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a922661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a922661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们分析了课堂内外关于有争议的教师言论的争论,但没有人密切关注与教授决定日常教学方法有关的学术自由方面。这种疏忽,再加上制定教学规范的障碍,导致学术界忽视了学术自由需要对教学进行集体监督的方式。通过从学术自由的角度看待教学选择,本文鼓励教师以类似于我们在开展研究或确定课程内容时查阅学科文献的方式,参与到教学学术研究中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Academic Freedom Protect Pedagogical Autonomy?

Scholars have analyzed debates about controversial faculty speech inside and outside of the classroom, but none have paid close attention to the facet of academic freedom related to professors’ decisions about daily teaching methods. This omission, along with obstacles to enacting pedagogical norms, has caused the scholarly community to overlook the manner in which academic freedom entails collective supervision of teaching. By viewing instructional choices through the prism of academic freedom, this essay encourages faculty members to engage with the scholarship of teaching in a manner that is similar to how we consult disciplinary literature when conducting research or determining course content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Higher Education
Review of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), The Review of Higher Education provides a forum for discussion of issues affecting higher education. The journal advances the study of college and university issues by publishing peer-reviewed articles, essays, reviews, and research findings. Its broad approach emphasizes systematic inquiry and practical implications. Considered one of the leading research journals in the field, The Review keeps scholars, academic leaders, and public policymakers abreast of critical issues facing higher education today.
期刊最新文献
Hoped-For Selves: Using Possible Selves to Explore the Career and College-Going Aspirations for Gang-Involved Latino Boys Tenure Bans: An Exploratory Study of State Legislation Proposing to Eliminate Faculty Tenure, 2012-2022 Black Taxes: African-American Doctoral Students Experiencing Tokenism at a Predominantly White Institution "It's an Old White Boys' Club:" Faculty of Color's Perceptions of Policy Engagement Language and Postsecondary Trajectories: How "Ever-English Learner" Status Predicts College Student Pathways and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1