分析用于高纤维素乙醇生产的三种玉米芯残渣木质素化处理方法

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS BioEnergy Research Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1007/s12155-024-10738-3
KeKe Cheng, TianMei Wu, XiaoBi Tan, HuiXiong Zhong
{"title":"分析用于高纤维素乙醇生产的三种玉米芯残渣木质素化处理方法","authors":"KeKe Cheng,&nbsp;TianMei Wu,&nbsp;XiaoBi Tan,&nbsp;HuiXiong Zhong","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10738-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three delignification treatments of corncob residues (CCR), including NaOH, formic acid, and sulfite treatments, were compared at the respective optimized condition and in light of chemical compositions, sugar recovery, and ethanol production. NaOH and sulfite treatment can remove lignin in the CCR efficiently. Though NaOH treatment showed a superior ability of delignification, its solid cellulose recovery is lower than that of sulfite treatment. The sulfite treatment has the highest selectivity between delignification and cellulose conservation. The formic acid-treated CCR still had high lignin contents because formic acid also accelerated the solvation of cellulose. In fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with 25% substrate loading, the highest 77.1 ± 2.33 g/L ethanol was from NaOH-treated CCR, corresponding to a CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.208 ± 0.0021 g/g. However, the sulfite pretreated CCR also produced 68.2 ± 2.22 g/L ethanol, with a higher CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.219 ± 0.0012 g/g. The high substrate dosage is beneficial to ethanol concentration but not beneficial to CCR-to-ethanol yield. The optimal substrate dosage required for ethanol production depends on the targeted aim (ethanol concentration or CCR-to-ethanol yield).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1449 - 1459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Three Delignification Treatments of Corncob Residues for High Cellulosic Ethanol Production\",\"authors\":\"KeKe Cheng,&nbsp;TianMei Wu,&nbsp;XiaoBi Tan,&nbsp;HuiXiong Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12155-024-10738-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Three delignification treatments of corncob residues (CCR), including NaOH, formic acid, and sulfite treatments, were compared at the respective optimized condition and in light of chemical compositions, sugar recovery, and ethanol production. NaOH and sulfite treatment can remove lignin in the CCR efficiently. Though NaOH treatment showed a superior ability of delignification, its solid cellulose recovery is lower than that of sulfite treatment. The sulfite treatment has the highest selectivity between delignification and cellulose conservation. The formic acid-treated CCR still had high lignin contents because formic acid also accelerated the solvation of cellulose. In fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with 25% substrate loading, the highest 77.1 ± 2.33 g/L ethanol was from NaOH-treated CCR, corresponding to a CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.208 ± 0.0021 g/g. However, the sulfite pretreated CCR also produced 68.2 ± 2.22 g/L ethanol, with a higher CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.219 ± 0.0012 g/g. The high substrate dosage is beneficial to ethanol concentration but not beneficial to CCR-to-ethanol yield. The optimal substrate dosage required for ethanol production depends on the targeted aim (ethanol concentration or CCR-to-ethanol yield).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"1449 - 1459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10738-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10738-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据化学成分、糖回收率和乙醇产量,比较了玉米芯残渣(CCR)在各自优化条件下的三种木质素处理方法,包括 NaOH、甲酸和亚硫酸盐处理。NaOH 和亚硫酸盐处理可有效去除 CCR 中的木质素。虽然 NaOH 处理的脱木素能力更强,但其固体纤维素回收率低于亚硫酸盐处理。亚硫酸盐处理在木质素脱除和纤维素保存之间具有最高的选择性。甲酸处理的 CCR 中木质素含量仍然很高,因为甲酸也会加速纤维素的溶解。在 25% 底物负载的喂料批次同步糖化和发酵(SSF)中,NaOH 处理的 CCR 可产生最高的 77.1 ± 2.33 g/L 乙醇,对应的 CCR 转化为乙醇的产量为 0.208 ± 0.0021 g/g。然而,亚硫酸盐预处理的 CCR 也能产生 68.2 ± 2.22 克/升乙醇,CCR 转化为乙醇的产量更高,为 0.219 ± 0.0012 克/克。高底物用量有利于乙醇浓度的提高,但不利于 CCR 转化为乙醇的产量。乙醇生产所需的最佳底物用量取决于目标(乙醇浓度或 CCR 转化为乙醇的产量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Three Delignification Treatments of Corncob Residues for High Cellulosic Ethanol Production

Three delignification treatments of corncob residues (CCR), including NaOH, formic acid, and sulfite treatments, were compared at the respective optimized condition and in light of chemical compositions, sugar recovery, and ethanol production. NaOH and sulfite treatment can remove lignin in the CCR efficiently. Though NaOH treatment showed a superior ability of delignification, its solid cellulose recovery is lower than that of sulfite treatment. The sulfite treatment has the highest selectivity between delignification and cellulose conservation. The formic acid-treated CCR still had high lignin contents because formic acid also accelerated the solvation of cellulose. In fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with 25% substrate loading, the highest 77.1 ± 2.33 g/L ethanol was from NaOH-treated CCR, corresponding to a CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.208 ± 0.0021 g/g. However, the sulfite pretreated CCR also produced 68.2 ± 2.22 g/L ethanol, with a higher CCR-to-ethanol yield of 0.219 ± 0.0012 g/g. The high substrate dosage is beneficial to ethanol concentration but not beneficial to CCR-to-ethanol yield. The optimal substrate dosage required for ethanol production depends on the targeted aim (ethanol concentration or CCR-to-ethanol yield).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
期刊最新文献
pH Adjustment Alleviates Ammonia Inhibition of Cell Proliferation During a Short Resting Period in Semi-continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Fungus-Yeast Tri-culture System for In Situ Cellulase Production, Biodetoxification, and Bioethanol Production Using Rice Straw with Cyclic Shifting of Temperature Strategy Enhancing Surface Properties of Circular Carbon Biochar Derived from Spent Coffee Beans Through ZnCl2/KOH Activation Enhanced Carbon Dioxide Biofixation and Lipid Production of Chlorella sp. Using Alkali Absorber and Strategic Carbon Dioxide Supply Third-Generation L-Lactic Acid Biorefinery Approaches: Exploring the Viability of Macroalgae Detritus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1