自我调节能力在预测远程工作绩效中的作用:COVID-19大流行期间的横断面和小组研究

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Human Resource Development Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1002/hrdq.21523
Loredana Mihalca, Lucia Ratiu, Christoph Mengelkamp, Gabriela Brendea, Daniel Metz
{"title":"自我调节能力在预测远程工作绩效中的作用:COVID-19大流行期间的横断面和小组研究","authors":"Loredana Mihalca, Lucia Ratiu, Christoph Mengelkamp, Gabriela Brendea, Daniel Metz","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have argued that individual characteristics promoting self‐regulation such as self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were crucial for employees to cope effectively with the challenges of teleworking during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Yet, research simultaneously exploring these specific self‐regulatory abilities in relation to various performance dimensions is scarce. Thus, we examined whether self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting are related to proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity while teleworking during the pandemic using a cross‐sectional design (Study 1) and tested the directionality of these relationships using a two‐wave cross‐lagged panel design (Study 2). The degree of telework was considered a moderator for these relationships in both studies. Study 1 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 830) findings indicated that both self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were positively related to all performance dimensions and that the degree of telework moderated the regression of adaptivity on self‐efficacy to a small extent. Study 2 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 263) findings showed that self‐efficacy at Time 1 had a positive effect on self‐goal setting, proficiency, and adaptivity, measured at Time 2, whereas self‐goal setting at Time 1 did not predict significantly any of the performance dimensions at Time 2. We also found evidence that adaptivity positively influenced self‐efficacy over time. Our results provide important insights into the nature and directional relationships between self‐regulatory abilities and different performance dimensions while teleworking during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of self‐regulatory abilities in predicting performance while teleworking: A cross‐sectional and a panel study during the COVID‐19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Loredana Mihalca, Lucia Ratiu, Christoph Mengelkamp, Gabriela Brendea, Daniel Metz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hrdq.21523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholars have argued that individual characteristics promoting self‐regulation such as self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were crucial for employees to cope effectively with the challenges of teleworking during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Yet, research simultaneously exploring these specific self‐regulatory abilities in relation to various performance dimensions is scarce. Thus, we examined whether self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting are related to proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity while teleworking during the pandemic using a cross‐sectional design (Study 1) and tested the directionality of these relationships using a two‐wave cross‐lagged panel design (Study 2). The degree of telework was considered a moderator for these relationships in both studies. Study 1 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 830) findings indicated that both self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were positively related to all performance dimensions and that the degree of telework moderated the regression of adaptivity on self‐efficacy to a small extent. Study 2 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 263) findings showed that self‐efficacy at Time 1 had a positive effect on self‐goal setting, proficiency, and adaptivity, measured at Time 2, whereas self‐goal setting at Time 1 did not predict significantly any of the performance dimensions at Time 2. We also found evidence that adaptivity positively influenced self‐efficacy over time. Our results provide important insights into the nature and directional relationships between self‐regulatory abilities and different performance dimensions while teleworking during the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Development Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Development Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们认为,在 COVID-19 大流行的早期阶段,促进自我调节的个体特征(如自我效能和自我目标设定)对于员工有效应对远程工作的挑战至关重要。然而,同时探讨这些特定的自我调节能力与不同绩效维度之间关系的研究却很少。因此,我们采用横截面设计(研究 1)考察了自我效能感和自我目标设定是否与大流行期间远程工作的熟练程度、适应性和主动性相关,并采用两波交叉滞后面板设计(研究 2)检验了这些关系的方向性。在这两项研究中,远程工作的程度被认为是这些关系的调节因素。研究 1(N = 830)的结果表明,自我效能感和自我目标设定与所有绩效维度都呈正相关,而远程工作程度在很小程度上调节了适应性对自我效能感的回归。研究 2(N = 263)的结果显示,时间 1 的自我效能感对时间 2 的自我目标设定、熟练程度和适应性有积极影响,而时间 1 的自我目标设定对时间 2 的任何绩效维度都没有显著预测作用。我们还发现有证据表明,随着时间的推移,适应性会对自我效能产生积极影响。我们的研究结果为了解大流行病期间远程工作时自我调节能力与不同绩效维度之间的性质和方向关系提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of self‐regulatory abilities in predicting performance while teleworking: A cross‐sectional and a panel study during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Scholars have argued that individual characteristics promoting self‐regulation such as self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were crucial for employees to cope effectively with the challenges of teleworking during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Yet, research simultaneously exploring these specific self‐regulatory abilities in relation to various performance dimensions is scarce. Thus, we examined whether self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting are related to proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity while teleworking during the pandemic using a cross‐sectional design (Study 1) and tested the directionality of these relationships using a two‐wave cross‐lagged panel design (Study 2). The degree of telework was considered a moderator for these relationships in both studies. Study 1 (N = 830) findings indicated that both self‐efficacy and self‐goal setting were positively related to all performance dimensions and that the degree of telework moderated the regression of adaptivity on self‐efficacy to a small extent. Study 2 (N = 263) findings showed that self‐efficacy at Time 1 had a positive effect on self‐goal setting, proficiency, and adaptivity, measured at Time 2, whereas self‐goal setting at Time 1 did not predict significantly any of the performance dimensions at Time 2. We also found evidence that adaptivity positively influenced self‐efficacy over time. Our results provide important insights into the nature and directional relationships between self‐regulatory abilities and different performance dimensions while teleworking during the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Information for Contributors A reflective provocation on generativity and human resource development Bridging human resource development processes through generative Artificial Intelligence How remote workers manage loneliness and performance: Virtual social interaction as an alternative resource management strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1