{"title":"探索过二亚胺与生物大分子复合物的非线性光学特性:超分子计算研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00214-024-03098-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This study investigates the supramolecular interactions between perylene diimides (PDI) and nucleotides, specifically adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and cytidine monophosphate (CMP). Ten complexes (complex 1 (<span>l</span>-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 2 (B-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 3 (GLY-PDI-AMP), complex 4 (IMI-PDI-AMP), complex 5 (PYR-PDI-AMP, complex 6 (<span>l</span>-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 7 (B-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 8 (GLY-PDI-CMP), complex 9 (IMI-PDI-CMP), and complex 10 (PYR-PDI-CMP), were simulated using the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT method. The study explores NMR, IR, UV, hyperpolarizabilities, frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs), density of states (DOS), noncovalent interactions (NCI), iso-surface analysis, atom in molecule (AIM), dipole moment (<em>µ</em>), electron density distribution map (EDDM), transition density matrix (TDM), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and electron–hole analysis (EHA) using differential functional theory (DFT). The weak bonds formed were visualized using Discovery Studio Visualizer. The electronic properties of the complexes were examined through natural bond orbital (NBO) and natural population analysis (NPA), leading to nonlinear optics (NLO) study. Complex 6 demonstrates the highest NLO activity with γ static of 17,424,700.00, and complex 10 exhibits the weakest NLO activity with second dipole hyperpolarizability (γ static) at 25,116.10. Moreover, global reactivity factors for complexes 1–5 show EA ranging from 6.53 to 7.7, and ionization potential (IP) spans 7.8–8.8. Global hardness values highlight complex 4 as the hardest (<em>η</em> = 0.55) and complex 1 as the softest (<em>η</em> = 0.51). Electronegativity (X) varies from 7.28 to 8.25, with complex 3 being the most electronegative. Chemical potential (<em>μ</em>) ranges from − 7.9 to − 8.25, global softness (<em>σ</em>) identifies complex 1 as the softest (0.2575) and complex 4 as the hardest (0.435). Electrophilicity (<em>ω</em>) ranges from 33.30 to 61.87. Complexes 6–10 show EA from 6.7 to 7.53. IP values range from 8.4 to 8.6, with complexes 7 and 10 highest. Global hardness spans 0.53 to 0.85. <em>X</em> ranges from 7.55 to 8.06, with complex 7 the most electronegative. μ varies from − 7.55 to − 8.06, and complex 7 has the lowest. From <em>σ</em> values, complexes 9 and 10 are the softest. <em>ω</em> ranges from 35.53 to 60.78, with complex 7 the most electrophilic.</p>","PeriodicalId":23045,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Chemistry Accounts","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring nonlinear optical properties of perylene diimide and biomolecules complexes: a computational supramolecular study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00214-024-03098-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This study investigates the supramolecular interactions between perylene diimides (PDI) and nucleotides, specifically adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and cytidine monophosphate (CMP). Ten complexes (complex 1 (<span>l</span>-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 2 (B-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 3 (GLY-PDI-AMP), complex 4 (IMI-PDI-AMP), complex 5 (PYR-PDI-AMP, complex 6 (<span>l</span>-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 7 (B-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 8 (GLY-PDI-CMP), complex 9 (IMI-PDI-CMP), and complex 10 (PYR-PDI-CMP), were simulated using the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT method. The study explores NMR, IR, UV, hyperpolarizabilities, frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs), density of states (DOS), noncovalent interactions (NCI), iso-surface analysis, atom in molecule (AIM), dipole moment (<em>µ</em>), electron density distribution map (EDDM), transition density matrix (TDM), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and electron–hole analysis (EHA) using differential functional theory (DFT). The weak bonds formed were visualized using Discovery Studio Visualizer. The electronic properties of the complexes were examined through natural bond orbital (NBO) and natural population analysis (NPA), leading to nonlinear optics (NLO) study. Complex 6 demonstrates the highest NLO activity with γ static of 17,424,700.00, and complex 10 exhibits the weakest NLO activity with second dipole hyperpolarizability (γ static) at 25,116.10. Moreover, global reactivity factors for complexes 1–5 show EA ranging from 6.53 to 7.7, and ionization potential (IP) spans 7.8–8.8. Global hardness values highlight complex 4 as the hardest (<em>η</em> = 0.55) and complex 1 as the softest (<em>η</em> = 0.51). Electronegativity (X) varies from 7.28 to 8.25, with complex 3 being the most electronegative. Chemical potential (<em>μ</em>) ranges from − 7.9 to − 8.25, global softness (<em>σ</em>) identifies complex 1 as the softest (0.2575) and complex 4 as the hardest (0.435). Electrophilicity (<em>ω</em>) ranges from 33.30 to 61.87. Complexes 6–10 show EA from 6.7 to 7.53. IP values range from 8.4 to 8.6, with complexes 7 and 10 highest. Global hardness spans 0.53 to 0.85. <em>X</em> ranges from 7.55 to 8.06, with complex 7 the most electronegative. μ varies from − 7.55 to − 8.06, and complex 7 has the lowest. From <em>σ</em> values, complexes 9 and 10 are the softest. <em>ω</em> ranges from 35.53 to 60.78, with complex 7 the most electrophilic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Chemistry Accounts\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Chemistry Accounts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-024-03098-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Chemistry Accounts","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-024-03098-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring nonlinear optical properties of perylene diimide and biomolecules complexes: a computational supramolecular study
Abstract
This study investigates the supramolecular interactions between perylene diimides (PDI) and nucleotides, specifically adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and cytidine monophosphate (CMP). Ten complexes (complex 1 (l-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 2 (B-ala-PDI-AMP), complex 3 (GLY-PDI-AMP), complex 4 (IMI-PDI-AMP), complex 5 (PYR-PDI-AMP, complex 6 (l-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 7 (B-ala-PDI-CMP), complex 8 (GLY-PDI-CMP), complex 9 (IMI-PDI-CMP), and complex 10 (PYR-PDI-CMP), were simulated using the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT method. The study explores NMR, IR, UV, hyperpolarizabilities, frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs), density of states (DOS), noncovalent interactions (NCI), iso-surface analysis, atom in molecule (AIM), dipole moment (µ), electron density distribution map (EDDM), transition density matrix (TDM), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and electron–hole analysis (EHA) using differential functional theory (DFT). The weak bonds formed were visualized using Discovery Studio Visualizer. The electronic properties of the complexes were examined through natural bond orbital (NBO) and natural population analysis (NPA), leading to nonlinear optics (NLO) study. Complex 6 demonstrates the highest NLO activity with γ static of 17,424,700.00, and complex 10 exhibits the weakest NLO activity with second dipole hyperpolarizability (γ static) at 25,116.10. Moreover, global reactivity factors for complexes 1–5 show EA ranging from 6.53 to 7.7, and ionization potential (IP) spans 7.8–8.8. Global hardness values highlight complex 4 as the hardest (η = 0.55) and complex 1 as the softest (η = 0.51). Electronegativity (X) varies from 7.28 to 8.25, with complex 3 being the most electronegative. Chemical potential (μ) ranges from − 7.9 to − 8.25, global softness (σ) identifies complex 1 as the softest (0.2575) and complex 4 as the hardest (0.435). Electrophilicity (ω) ranges from 33.30 to 61.87. Complexes 6–10 show EA from 6.7 to 7.53. IP values range from 8.4 to 8.6, with complexes 7 and 10 highest. Global hardness spans 0.53 to 0.85. X ranges from 7.55 to 8.06, with complex 7 the most electronegative. μ varies from − 7.55 to − 8.06, and complex 7 has the lowest. From σ values, complexes 9 and 10 are the softest. ω ranges from 35.53 to 60.78, with complex 7 the most electrophilic.
期刊介绍:
TCA publishes papers in all fields of theoretical chemistry, computational chemistry, and modeling. Fundamental studies as well as applications are included in the scope. In many cases, theorists and computational chemists have special concerns which reach either across the vertical borders of the special disciplines in chemistry or else across the horizontal borders of structure, spectra, synthesis, and dynamics. TCA is especially interested in papers that impact upon multiple chemical disciplines.