{"title":"状态性癫痫的脑连接性可预测预后:弥散张量成像研究","authors":"Dong Ah Lee, Ho-Joon Lee, Kang Min Park","doi":"10.1111/jon.13196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, <i>p</i> = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, <i>p</i> = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, <i>p</i> = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, <i>p</i> = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, <i>p</i> = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.615, <i>p</i> = .003), mean clustering coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.544, <i>p</i> = .005), global efficiency (<i>r</i> = 0.515, <i>p</i> = .007), transitivity (<i>r</i> = 0.547, <i>p</i> = .007), and small-worldness index (<i>r</i> = 0.435, <i>p</i> = .024).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 3","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain connectivity in status epilepticus as a predictor of outcome: A diffusion tensor imaging study\",\"authors\":\"Dong Ah Lee, Ho-Joon Lee, Kang Min Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, <i>p</i> = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, <i>p</i> = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, <i>p</i> = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, <i>p</i> = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, <i>p</i> = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.615, <i>p</i> = .003), mean clustering coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.544, <i>p</i> = .005), global efficiency (<i>r</i> = 0.515, <i>p</i> = .007), transitivity (<i>r</i> = 0.547, <i>p</i> = .007), and small-worldness index (<i>r</i> = 0.435, <i>p</i> = .024).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"393-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:我们旨在探索癫痫状态的结构连接性:我们招募了接受弥散张量成像的参与者。我们应用图论研究结构连通性。我们比较了患者与健康对照组之间以及入院预后较差(改良Rankin量表[mRS] >3)和较好(mRS ≤3)的患者之间的结构连通性测量结果:我们共招募了 28 名患者和 31 名健康对照者(年龄分别为 65.5 岁和 62.0 岁,P = .438)。在这些患者中,分别有 16 人和 12 人的入院预后较差和较好(年龄为 65.5 岁对 62.0 岁,P = .438)。同类系数(-0.113 vs. -0.121,p = .021)、平均聚类系数(0.007 vs. 0.006,p = .009)、全局效率(0.023 vs. 0.020,p = .0090.020, p = .009)、传递性(0.007 vs. 0.006, p = .009)和小世界指数(0.006 vs. 0.005, p = .021)在癫痫状态患者中均高于健康对照组。入院预后差的患者的同类系数(-0.108 vs. -0.119,p = .042)、平均聚类系数(0.007 vs. 0.006,p = .042)和转运性(0.008 vs. 0.007,p = .042)均高于入院预后好的患者。MRS评分与结构连通性指标呈正相关,包括同类系数(r = 0.615,p = .003)、平均聚类系数(r = 0.544,p = .005)、全局效率(r = 0.515,p = .007)、转运性(r = 0.547,p = .007)和小世界指数(r = 0.435,p = .024):我们发现了结构连接的改变,显示癫痫状态患者的整合和分离增加,这可能与神经元同步化有关。这种效应在入院结果不佳的患者中更为明显,有可能重塑我们对癫痫状态机制的理解,并开发出更有针对性的治疗方法。
Brain connectivity in status epilepticus as a predictor of outcome: A diffusion tensor imaging study
Background and Purpose
We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.
Methods
We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.
Results
We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, p = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, p = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, p = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, p = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, p = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (r = 0.615, p = .003), mean clustering coefficient (r = 0.544, p = .005), global efficiency (r = 0.515, p = .007), transitivity (r = 0.547, p = .007), and small-worldness index (r = 0.435, p = .024).
Conclusion
We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!