{"title":"从动力系统的角度审视认知的灵活性和稳定性","authors":"Sebastian Musslick , Anastasia Bizyaeva","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263/pdfft?md5=c4abede5334b63e9d7c59133ee2f80d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000263-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining cognitive flexibility and stability through the lens of dynamical systems\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Musslick , Anastasia Bizyaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263/pdfft?md5=c4abede5334b63e9d7c59133ee2f80d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000263-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining cognitive flexibility and stability through the lens of dynamical systems
Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.