从动力系统的角度审视认知的灵活性和稳定性

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101375
Sebastian Musslick , Anastasia Bizyaeva
{"title":"从动力系统的角度审视认知的灵活性和稳定性","authors":"Sebastian Musslick ,&nbsp;Anastasia Bizyaeva","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263/pdfft?md5=c4abede5334b63e9d7c59133ee2f80d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000263-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining cognitive flexibility and stability through the lens of dynamical systems\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Musslick ,&nbsp;Anastasia Bizyaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263/pdfft?md5=c4abede5334b63e9d7c59133ee2f80d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000263-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知的稳定性和灵活性被认为是目标导向行为的关键要素。本综述介绍了作为研究认知灵活性和稳定性理论框架的动力系统。在对动力系统理论进行温和的介绍之后,我们将讨论如何通过此类模型的视角对认知灵活性和稳定性进行操作和研究。借鉴动态系统理论的最新进展,我们认为认知灵活性和稳定性的各种模型,从尖峰神经元模型到人类任务转换模型,再到动物集体行为模型,都可以用低维动态系统的相同数学原理来理解。这些原理表明,不同复杂程度的动力系统模型都需要在认知灵活性和稳定性之间做出权衡。最后,我们讨论了这一统一观点的后果,并从认知灵活性和稳定性的行为和神经相关性方面考察了其解释范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining cognitive flexibility and stability through the lens of dynamical systems

Cognitive stability and flexibility are regarded as key ingredients of goal-directed behavior. This review introduces dynamical systems as a theoretical framework for studying cognitive flexibility and stability. Following a gentle introduction to dynamical systems theory, we discuss how cognitive flexibility and stability can be operationalized and examined through the lens of such models. Drawing from recent advances in dynamical systems theory, we argue that various models of cognitive flexibility and stability, ranging from models of spiking neurons to models of human task switching to models of collective animal behavior, can be understood in terms of the same mathematical principles of low-dimensional dynamical systems. These principles suggest a trade-off between cognitive flexibility and stability inherent to dynamical system models of varying complexity. We conclude by discussing the consequences of this unified view and examine its explanatory scope in terms of behavioral and neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions Nonsynaptic encoding of behavior by neuropeptides Stress-free indulgence: indulge adaptively to promote goal pursuit and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1