不断取得新的科技突破,提高水产养殖的价值和效率

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Reviews in Aquaculture Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1111/raq.12907
Qingchao Wang, Pin Nie
{"title":"不断取得新的科技突破,提高水产养殖的价值和效率","authors":"Qingchao Wang,&nbsp;Pin Nie","doi":"10.1111/raq.12907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The efficiency of aquaculture in producing high-quality fishery or aquatic products can be significantly improved with methodological breakthroughs and conceptual innovations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The increasing exchanges and cooperations among aquaculture scientists and enterprisers since 2022 should further provoke the idea and technical innovation for the sustainable development of aquaculture. During a visit to Australia in 2023, Dr. Qingchao Wang, a junior editorial board member of this journal and one of the two authors of this editorial, visited functional food exhibitions with aquatic products and discussed about offshore aquaculture and gene editing development with Australian scientists.</p><p>Coincidently, in this issue, it is found that these topics are well reflected, with articles also covering aquatic animal diseases, immunity, genetics and breeding, nutrition utilisation and feed sources, microbiome and homeostasis, fish exercise and deformities, bioflocs, and sustainability.</p><p>It is of interest to note that offshore aquaculture in deep sea has recently been a focus of mariculture development in China, which could overcome multiple limitations in coastal waters. In this issue, Dong et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> summarised the advancements and hurdles of deeper offshore aquaculture in China. The authors illustrated the existing 40 sets of offshore aquaculture infrastructure and also pointed out that the current development trajectory is struggling to meet its goals in increasing production and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, environmental management of offshore aquaculture is recognised as important for its sustainability. In this issue, Simone and Vopel<span><sup>3</sup></span> addressed the importance of proactive environmental management by incorporating solute exchange measurements in offshore aquaculture. They argued the necessity to define the metabolic capacity of the receiving environment and to quantify the organic assimilation capacity of the seafloor. As concluded in the article, a comprehensive understanding of settled farm wastes with broad measurements including geochemical and macrofauna community metrics, diagenetic models and predictive modelling should be important to give farmers confidence to expand their production sustainably.</p><p>The CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing has been tested in several species of fish in aquaculture, which is considered as potential for creating varieties of species for aquaculture, and in this issue, genetic breeding of oyster and kelp is also analysed. Gene-edited organisms may become ideally suitable for environmental sustainability by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes and farming efficiency; however, the application of gene editing may be also challenging in terms of public acceptance, sustainability and regulation, and so forth. Robinson et al.<span><sup>4</sup></span> provided a framework for risk–benefit analysis with nine key considerations, including genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities, as a guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture. The evaluation on the potential benefits and harms of gene editing in aquaculture should be considered by scientists as well as the industry, and to a large extent in society in general.</p><p>Nutrient utilisation is also a key determinant in aquaculture efficiency, which needs fundamental and further research and requires the exploration of new feed materials including microalgae. In this issue, Bu et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> gave an overview on the history and achievements in aquaculture nutrition research and feed industry in China. Importantly, these authors proposed the direction for the development of feed industry towards environmental friendliness, safety, intelligence and cost-effectiveness.</p><p>It is generally accepted that aquaculture can provide nutritional and valuable products, some of which can even be developed into functional food supplements. However, aquaculture is facing challenges with new farming systems, novel biotechnology and feed processing techniques, which can further significantly improve aquaculture efficiency. The practical application of scientific and technical breakthroughs in aquaculture should also be evaluated from a sustainability point of view, which may be important for social awareness and acceptability of future aquaculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12907","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel and continuous scientific and technical breakthroughs increase value and efficiency in aquaculture\",\"authors\":\"Qingchao Wang,&nbsp;Pin Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/raq.12907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The efficiency of aquaculture in producing high-quality fishery or aquatic products can be significantly improved with methodological breakthroughs and conceptual innovations.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The increasing exchanges and cooperations among aquaculture scientists and enterprisers since 2022 should further provoke the idea and technical innovation for the sustainable development of aquaculture. During a visit to Australia in 2023, Dr. Qingchao Wang, a junior editorial board member of this journal and one of the two authors of this editorial, visited functional food exhibitions with aquatic products and discussed about offshore aquaculture and gene editing development with Australian scientists.</p><p>Coincidently, in this issue, it is found that these topics are well reflected, with articles also covering aquatic animal diseases, immunity, genetics and breeding, nutrition utilisation and feed sources, microbiome and homeostasis, fish exercise and deformities, bioflocs, and sustainability.</p><p>It is of interest to note that offshore aquaculture in deep sea has recently been a focus of mariculture development in China, which could overcome multiple limitations in coastal waters. In this issue, Dong et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> summarised the advancements and hurdles of deeper offshore aquaculture in China. The authors illustrated the existing 40 sets of offshore aquaculture infrastructure and also pointed out that the current development trajectory is struggling to meet its goals in increasing production and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, environmental management of offshore aquaculture is recognised as important for its sustainability. In this issue, Simone and Vopel<span><sup>3</sup></span> addressed the importance of proactive environmental management by incorporating solute exchange measurements in offshore aquaculture. They argued the necessity to define the metabolic capacity of the receiving environment and to quantify the organic assimilation capacity of the seafloor. As concluded in the article, a comprehensive understanding of settled farm wastes with broad measurements including geochemical and macrofauna community metrics, diagenetic models and predictive modelling should be important to give farmers confidence to expand their production sustainably.</p><p>The CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing has been tested in several species of fish in aquaculture, which is considered as potential for creating varieties of species for aquaculture, and in this issue, genetic breeding of oyster and kelp is also analysed. Gene-edited organisms may become ideally suitable for environmental sustainability by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes and farming efficiency; however, the application of gene editing may be also challenging in terms of public acceptance, sustainability and regulation, and so forth. Robinson et al.<span><sup>4</sup></span> provided a framework for risk–benefit analysis with nine key considerations, including genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities, as a guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture. The evaluation on the potential benefits and harms of gene editing in aquaculture should be considered by scientists as well as the industry, and to a large extent in society in general.</p><p>Nutrient utilisation is also a key determinant in aquaculture efficiency, which needs fundamental and further research and requires the exploration of new feed materials including microalgae. In this issue, Bu et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> gave an overview on the history and achievements in aquaculture nutrition research and feed industry in China. Importantly, these authors proposed the direction for the development of feed industry towards environmental friendliness, safety, intelligence and cost-effectiveness.</p><p>It is generally accepted that aquaculture can provide nutritional and valuable products, some of which can even be developed into functional food supplements. However, aquaculture is facing challenges with new farming systems, novel biotechnology and feed processing techniques, which can further significantly improve aquaculture efficiency. The practical application of scientific and technical breakthroughs in aquaculture should also be evaluated from a sustainability point of view, which may be important for social awareness and acceptability of future aquaculture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12907\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12907\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 自 2022 年以来,水产养殖科学家和企业之间的交流与合作日益增多,这应进一步激发水产 养殖可持续发展的理念和技术创新。2023 年,本刊初级编委、本期社论两位作者之一王庆超博士在访问澳大利亚期间,参观了水产功能性食品展,并与澳大利亚科学家探讨了近海养殖和基因编辑的发展。巧合的是,在本期杂志中,我们发现这些主题都得到了很好的体现,文章还涉及水生动物疾病、免疫、遗传与育种、营养利用与饲料来源、微生物组与平衡、鱼类运动与畸形、生物絮体和可持续性等方面。本期,Dong 等人2 总结了中国深海近海养殖的进展和障碍。作者介绍了现有的 40 套近海水产养殖基础设施,并指出目前的发展轨迹难以实现增产和减少温室气体排放的目标。然而,近海水产养殖的环境管理被认为对其可持续性非常重要。在本期杂志中,Simone 和 Vopel3 通过将溶质交换测量纳入近海水产养殖,探讨了主动环境管理的重要性。他们认为有必要确定接收环境的新陈代谢能力,并量化海底的有机同化能力。正如文章所总结的,通过广泛的测量,包括地球化学和大型水底生物群落指标、成因模型和预测建模,全面了解沉淀的养殖场废物,对于让养殖户有信心可持续地扩大生产非常重要。基于CRISPR-Cas9的基因编辑已在多个水产养殖鱼类物种中进行了测试,被认为具有创造水产养殖物种品种的潜力,本期还分析了牡蛎和海带的遗传育种。基因编辑生物可通过改善动物福利、营养属性和养殖效率,成为环境可持续发展的理想选择;然而,基因编辑的应用在公众接受度、可持续性和监管等方面也可能面临挑战。罗宾逊等人4 提供了一个风险效益分析框架,包括基因影响、生态影响、疾病风险缓解、编辑性质、供应链环境足迹、动物福利、人类营养、商业道德影响和对当地社区的影响等九个主要考虑因素,作为评估在水产养殖中使用基因编辑的指南。对基因编辑在水产养殖中的潜在益处和害处的评估应由科学家和业界,乃至整个社会来考虑。营养物质的利用也是决定水产养殖效率的关键因素,这需要基础研究和进一步研究,并需要探索包括微藻在内的新饲料原料。本期,Bu 等人5 综述了中国水产养殖营养研究和饲料工业的历史和成就。人们普遍认为,水产养殖可以提供有营养、有价值的产品,其中一些甚至可以开发成功能性食品补充剂。然而,水产养殖正面临着新的养殖系统、新型生物技术和饲料加工技术的挑战,这些技术可以进一步显著提高水产养殖效率。水产养殖中科技突破的实际应用也应从可持续发展的角度进行评估,这可能对未来水产养殖的社会意识和可接受性很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel and continuous scientific and technical breakthroughs increase value and efficiency in aquaculture

The efficiency of aquaculture in producing high-quality fishery or aquatic products can be significantly improved with methodological breakthroughs and conceptual innovations.1 The increasing exchanges and cooperations among aquaculture scientists and enterprisers since 2022 should further provoke the idea and technical innovation for the sustainable development of aquaculture. During a visit to Australia in 2023, Dr. Qingchao Wang, a junior editorial board member of this journal and one of the two authors of this editorial, visited functional food exhibitions with aquatic products and discussed about offshore aquaculture and gene editing development with Australian scientists.

Coincidently, in this issue, it is found that these topics are well reflected, with articles also covering aquatic animal diseases, immunity, genetics and breeding, nutrition utilisation and feed sources, microbiome and homeostasis, fish exercise and deformities, bioflocs, and sustainability.

It is of interest to note that offshore aquaculture in deep sea has recently been a focus of mariculture development in China, which could overcome multiple limitations in coastal waters. In this issue, Dong et al.2 summarised the advancements and hurdles of deeper offshore aquaculture in China. The authors illustrated the existing 40 sets of offshore aquaculture infrastructure and also pointed out that the current development trajectory is struggling to meet its goals in increasing production and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, environmental management of offshore aquaculture is recognised as important for its sustainability. In this issue, Simone and Vopel3 addressed the importance of proactive environmental management by incorporating solute exchange measurements in offshore aquaculture. They argued the necessity to define the metabolic capacity of the receiving environment and to quantify the organic assimilation capacity of the seafloor. As concluded in the article, a comprehensive understanding of settled farm wastes with broad measurements including geochemical and macrofauna community metrics, diagenetic models and predictive modelling should be important to give farmers confidence to expand their production sustainably.

The CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing has been tested in several species of fish in aquaculture, which is considered as potential for creating varieties of species for aquaculture, and in this issue, genetic breeding of oyster and kelp is also analysed. Gene-edited organisms may become ideally suitable for environmental sustainability by improving animal welfare, nutritional attributes and farming efficiency; however, the application of gene editing may be also challenging in terms of public acceptance, sustainability and regulation, and so forth. Robinson et al.4 provided a framework for risk–benefit analysis with nine key considerations, including genetic impacts, ecological impacts, disease risk mitigation, nature of edit, supply chain environmental footprint, animal welfare, human nutrition, ethical business implications and impacts on local communities, as a guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture. The evaluation on the potential benefits and harms of gene editing in aquaculture should be considered by scientists as well as the industry, and to a large extent in society in general.

Nutrient utilisation is also a key determinant in aquaculture efficiency, which needs fundamental and further research and requires the exploration of new feed materials including microalgae. In this issue, Bu et al.5 gave an overview on the history and achievements in aquaculture nutrition research and feed industry in China. Importantly, these authors proposed the direction for the development of feed industry towards environmental friendliness, safety, intelligence and cost-effectiveness.

It is generally accepted that aquaculture can provide nutritional and valuable products, some of which can even be developed into functional food supplements. However, aquaculture is facing challenges with new farming systems, novel biotechnology and feed processing techniques, which can further significantly improve aquaculture efficiency. The practical application of scientific and technical breakthroughs in aquaculture should also be evaluated from a sustainability point of view, which may be important for social awareness and acceptability of future aquaculture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
期刊最新文献
Salmon lice biology, environmental factors, and smolt behaviour with implications for the Norwegian salmon farming management system: A critical review Mitigating the role of aquaculture in crustacean invasions Cracking the myth: Bivalve farming is not a CO2 sink Current disease treatments for the ornamental pet fish trade and their associated problems Sustainable aquaculture over the last 30 years: An analysis of the scientific literature by the Text Mining approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1