Health of farmed fish and shellfish deserves a top priority. To help prevent and fight the global disease crisis in aquaculture, it is high time to further explore immunology. And high time for immunologists specialized in aquaculture to start taking aquaculture more seriously. As a first step forward, find here some challenges and many opportunities.
{"title":"Why aquaculture needs immunology","authors":"Geert F. Wiegertjes","doi":"10.1111/raq.12946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12946","url":null,"abstract":"Health of farmed fish and shellfish deserves a top priority. To help prevent and fight the global disease crisis in aquaculture, it is high time to further explore immunology. And high time for immunologists specialized in aquaculture to start taking aquaculture more seriously. As a first step forward, find here some challenges and many opportunities.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141489827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carrie J. Byron, Sophie Koch, Myriam D. Callier, Lotta Kluger, Dror L. Angel, Jan Vanaverbeke, Ramon Filgueira
Within the framework of Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (EAA), ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a key concept that helps to determine the upper limit of production without compromising ecosystem functioning. The implementation of ECC is complex as ECC differs between type of farms and location and standardised methods should be developed for management. There is therefore a clear need for operational indicators. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to carry out a systematic literature review on shellfish and seaweed aquaculture-environment interactions to list the most used environmental indicators, (2) to classify the indicators according to the effects they measure (i.e., benthic, water quality, food web interactions, cultured organism health, resource use) and the scale at which they are applied, and (3) to assess their potential based on four indicator criteria categories: sensitivity, accuracy and precision, feasibility and utility, and ecosystem-level scalability. Overall, indicators describing benthic effects were the most highly cited and scored. Indicators identified for bivalve and seaweed culture were discussed and compared to previous work on salmon aquaculture indicators to highlight similarities and differences across trophic levels. In addition, questions related to the challenges of ECC indicators implementation were presented to a panel of experts. The scoring and consultation provided the source of discussion on environmental management consistent with EAA.
在水产养殖生态系统方法（EAA）框架内，生态承载力（ECC）是一个关键概念，有助于在不损害生态系统功能的情况下确定生产上限。生态承载力的实施非常复杂，因为不同类型的养殖场和不同地点的生态承载力各不相同，应制定标准化的管理方法。因此，显然需要制定操作指标。本文的目标是(1) 对贝类和海藻水产养殖与环境的相互作用进行系统的文献综述，列出最常用的环境指标，(2) 根据指标测量的效果（即底栖、水质、食物网相互作用、养殖生物健康、资源利用）和应用规模对指标进行分类，(3) 根据四个指标标准类别评估其潜力：灵敏度、准确性和精确度、可行性和实用性以及生态系统级可扩展性。总体而言，描述底栖生物影响的指标被引用和评分最多。对双壳贝类和海藻养殖指标进行了讨论，并将其与以前的鲑鱼养殖指标进行了比较，以突出不同营养级的异同。此外，还向专家小组提出了与实施环境协调委员会指标的挑战有关的问题。评分和咨询为讨论与 EAA 一致的环境管理提供了源泉。
{"title":"Indicators for ecological carrying capacity of bivalve and seaweed aquaculture","authors":"Carrie J. Byron, Sophie Koch, Myriam D. Callier, Lotta Kluger, Dror L. Angel, Jan Vanaverbeke, Ramon Filgueira","doi":"10.1111/raq.12945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12945","url":null,"abstract":"Within the framework of Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (EAA), ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a key concept that helps to determine the upper limit of production without compromising ecosystem functioning. The implementation of ECC is complex as ECC differs between type of farms and location and standardised methods should be developed for management. There is therefore a clear need for operational indicators. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to carry out a systematic literature review on shellfish and seaweed aquaculture-environment interactions to list the most used environmental indicators, (2) to classify the indicators according to the effects they measure (i.e., benthic, water quality, food web interactions, cultured organism health, resource use) and the scale at which they are applied, and (3) to assess their potential based on four indicator criteria categories: sensitivity, accuracy and precision, feasibility and utility, and ecosystem-level scalability. Overall, indicators describing benthic effects were the most highly cited and scored. Indicators identified for bivalve and seaweed culture were discussed and compared to previous work on salmon aquaculture indicators to highlight similarities and differences across trophic levels. In addition, questions related to the challenges of ECC indicators implementation were presented to a panel of experts. The scoring and consultation provided the source of discussion on environmental management consistent with EAA.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141462013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hien Van Doan, Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon, Hung Quang Tran, Chinh Xuan Le, Eman Y. Mohammady, Ehab R. El‐Haroun, Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar, Einar Ringo, Vlastimil Stejskal, Mahmoud A. O. Dawood
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating the inclusion of β‐glucan in aquaculture animal diets and its impact on their health outcomes. Relevant studies were identified from Scopus and Web of Science databases. A total of 82 primary studies published between 1996 and 2024 were reviewed, of which 70 were included in the meta‐analysis. The results revealed that the application of β‐glucan to aquaculture animal's diets significantly enhanced specific growth rate (SGR; mean effect, g = 2.71; p < 0.001), feed conversion ratio (FCR; g = −3.88; p < 0.0001) and lowered mortality after exposure to pathogens. Likewise, β‐glucan had a positive influence (p < 0.0001) on innate immune parameters (lysozyme and phagocyte activity, NBT, ACH50, and IgM). The study found that the effects of β‐glucans varied among marine and freshwater fish where freshwater fishes (g = 2.05–6.57) exhibit better performance. This study also found a negative correlation between fish's innate immune response and trophic level, suggesting that fish with higher trophic levels may be less efficient at absorbing this bio‐stimulant. Even though there were high heterogeneity (I2 = 73%–97%, p < 0.05) due to the diversity of tested organisms and publication bias, our model and findings are valid. The findings suggest that the dietary application of β‐glucans can have beneficial effects on growth and immune responses especially for freshwater species. The validity of these observations needs to be confirmed by further prospective studies.
{"title":"Role of β‐glucan on finfish and shellfish health and well‐being: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Hien Van Doan, Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon, Hung Quang Tran, Chinh Xuan Le, Eman Y. Mohammady, Ehab R. El‐Haroun, Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar, Einar Ringo, Vlastimil Stejskal, Mahmoud A. O. Dawood","doi":"10.1111/raq.12944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12944","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating the inclusion of β‐glucan in aquaculture animal diets and its impact on their health outcomes. Relevant studies were identified from Scopus and Web of Science databases. A total of 82 primary studies published between 1996 and 2024 were reviewed, of which 70 were included in the meta‐analysis. The results revealed that the application of β‐glucan to aquaculture animal's diets significantly enhanced specific growth rate (SGR; mean effect, <jats:italic>g</jats:italic> = 2.71; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), feed conversion ratio (FCR; <jats:italic>g</jats:italic> = −3.88; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001) and lowered mortality after exposure to pathogens. Likewise, β‐glucan had a positive influence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.0001) on innate immune parameters (lysozyme and phagocyte activity, NBT, ACH50, and IgM). The study found that the effects of β‐glucans varied among marine and freshwater fish where freshwater fishes (<jats:italic>g</jats:italic> = 2.05–6.57) exhibit better performance. This study also found a negative correlation between fish's innate immune response and trophic level, suggesting that fish with higher trophic levels may be less efficient at absorbing this bio‐stimulant. Even though there were high heterogeneity (<jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 73%–97%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05) due to the diversity of tested organisms and publication bias, our model and findings are valid. The findings suggest that the dietary application of β‐glucans can have beneficial effects on growth and immune responses especially for freshwater species. The validity of these observations needs to be confirmed by further prospective studies.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141461792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brianne A. Lyall, P. Eckhard Witten, Chris G. Carter, Matthew R. Perrott, Jane E. Symonds, Seumas P. Walker, Zac Waddington, Gianluca Amoroso
A healthy skeletal system is fundamental to fish welfare and performance and a key physiological feature of a robust fish. The presence of skeletal deformities in farmed salmonids is a persistent welfare problem in aquaculture, and one which threatens to impede industry growth. Deformities of the fine bones of fish, such as ribs and intermuscular bones (IBs), have received less attention than vertebral body deformities, despite their potential to compromise fish welfare and product quality. IBs, commercially known as pin bones, are small spicule-like bones embedded in the muscle fillets of salmonids, cyprinids and other basal teleost species. In farmed basal teleosts, they impact fish processing, have negative effects on the economic value of fish and present a potential consumer health concern if ingested. Current understanding of IB development and function in teleosts has mostly relied on morphological research. More recently, advances in our understanding of molecular mechanisms of IB development in cyprinids have been made, largely due to the exploration of breeding IB-free fish for use in aquaculture. In this review, we explore the existing literature on IBs in teleosts, highlight the points of contention within this field of research and identify the significant knowledge gaps about the development and function of salmonid IBs. To our knowledge, there is no available research on the function of IBs and scarce research concerning IB development in salmonids. Future research on teleost IBs would benefit from the use of consistent terminology to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and identify research outputs in this field.
{"title":"The problems with pin bones: Intermuscular bone development and function in salmonids and their implications for aquaculture","authors":"Brianne A. Lyall, P. Eckhard Witten, Chris G. Carter, Matthew R. Perrott, Jane E. Symonds, Seumas P. Walker, Zac Waddington, Gianluca Amoroso","doi":"10.1111/raq.12942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12942","url":null,"abstract":"A healthy skeletal system is fundamental to fish welfare and performance and a key physiological feature of a robust fish. The presence of skeletal deformities in farmed salmonids is a persistent welfare problem in aquaculture, and one which threatens to impede industry growth. Deformities of the fine bones of fish, such as ribs and intermuscular bones (IBs), have received less attention than vertebral body deformities, despite their potential to compromise fish welfare and product quality. IBs, commercially known as pin bones, are small spicule-like bones embedded in the muscle fillets of salmonids, cyprinids and other basal teleost species. In farmed basal teleosts, they impact fish processing, have negative effects on the economic value of fish and present a potential consumer health concern if ingested. Current understanding of IB development and function in teleosts has mostly relied on morphological research. More recently, advances in our understanding of molecular mechanisms of IB development in cyprinids have been made, largely due to the exploration of breeding IB-free fish for use in aquaculture. In this review, we explore the existing literature on IBs in teleosts, highlight the points of contention within this field of research and identify the significant knowledge gaps about the development and function of salmonid IBs. To our knowledge, there is no available research on the function of IBs and scarce research concerning IB development in salmonids. Future research on teleost IBs would benefit from the use of consistent terminology to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and identify research outputs in this field.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Naveed Nabi, Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Adnan Amin, Mohd Ashraf Rather, Imtiaz Ahmed, Younis Ahmad Hajam, Saba Khursheed, Monisa Mehboob Malik, Adnan Abubakr
The upsurge in the usage of plastics on a global scale has led to the widespread occurrence of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments. This review starts by outlining the current global scenario of plastic production. It then delves into the various sources of plastics and their entry into aquatic systems, including their impact on fisheries and the aquaculture sector. The detailed analysis of plastic entry and various methods of degradation into small sized, MPs followed by their transport, uptake and trophic transference have been reviewed systematically. Besides, the review summarizes the current knowledge on impacts of MPs, their additives and associated contaminants on organisms living in the aquatic environment, particularly fish thriving in cultured conditions. The analysis of effects of MPs alone and in association with other contaminants like heavy metals, organic pollutants and leachates reveal serious effects such as cytotoxicity, immune response, oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, barrier attributes and genotoxicity among various aquatic species particularly, fish. In addition, the present review discusses MPs invasion into aquaculture systems, explores risk assessment both in terms of exposure risk and toxicological risks associated with biochemical nature, size, shape and concentration of MPs. Besides, risk management strategies and future prospective to control MPs associated hazards have also been highlighted. In summary, the present review outlines the various sources, fate, impact of MPs in aquatic environment highlighting the need to recognize MPs pollution as a serious threat to aquatic organisms and to formulate strategies including prevention, reduce, reuse and safe disposal of plastic material.
{"title":"Understanding the sources, fate and effects of microplastics in aquatic environments with a focus on risk profiling in aquaculture systems","authors":"Naveed Nabi, Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Adnan Amin, Mohd Ashraf Rather, Imtiaz Ahmed, Younis Ahmad Hajam, Saba Khursheed, Monisa Mehboob Malik, Adnan Abubakr","doi":"10.1111/raq.12941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12941","url":null,"abstract":"The upsurge in the usage of plastics on a global scale has led to the widespread occurrence of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments. This review starts by outlining the current global scenario of plastic production. It then delves into the various sources of plastics and their entry into aquatic systems, including their impact on fisheries and the aquaculture sector. The detailed analysis of plastic entry and various methods of degradation into small sized, MPs followed by their transport, uptake and trophic transference have been reviewed systematically. Besides, the review summarizes the current knowledge on impacts of MPs, their additives and associated contaminants on organisms living in the aquatic environment, particularly fish thriving in cultured conditions. The analysis of effects of MPs alone and in association with other contaminants like heavy metals, organic pollutants and leachates reveal serious effects such as cytotoxicity, immune response, oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, barrier attributes and genotoxicity among various aquatic species particularly, fish. In addition, the present review discusses MPs invasion into aquaculture systems, explores risk assessment both in terms of exposure risk and toxicological risks associated with biochemical nature, size, shape and concentration of MPs. Besides, risk management strategies and future prospective to control MPs associated hazards have also been highlighted. In summary, the present review outlines the various sources, fate, impact of MPs in aquatic environment highlighting the need to recognize MPs pollution as a serious threat to aquatic organisms and to formulate strategies including prevention, reduce, reuse and safe disposal of plastic material.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141430623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Arabic Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12929","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12929","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology continually reshapes our interactions with others and the broader society, with the environment, with the way we work and play, and possibly even the way we think. This continuous change seems to have recently accelerated by the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. For those like us who are not AI experts, a simpler way to understand AI might be as a combination of algorithms and technologies that enable machines to mimic human-like cognitive functions, including problem-solving, learning from experience, and recognising patterns, all guided by human commands.1 Advanced AI capabilities, including complex machine learning algorithms and specialised decision-making processes, are predominantly found in paid platforms, tailored for industrial and collaborative use. Whereas other AI tools are freely available to the public and most of them engage with users in natural language conversations, that is, chatbots. Examples of such open-source AIs include Gemini (Google-based), Meta.ai (developed by Meta and integrated with their social media platforms), and ChatGPT (OpenAI). While each platform offers distinct features and functionalities, ChatGPT has notably revolutionised how the general public perceives and utilises AI tools.2 Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has been adopted for conversational interactions and widely used for knowledge searches, marking a significant shift in the accessibility and usability of AI for everyday users.
In the context of aquaculture, AI has the potential to help us drive the activity towards more sustainable practices.3 ChatGPT, for example, has surely been a source of information for many aquaculture students and farmers, and an additional tool for writing and researching for scientists. Most of us have probably used ChatGPT at least once for fun and curiosity, but possibly also to summarise information, provide definitions, interpret or translate a text, revise a code, or for searching an explanation on an unfamiliar concept related to aquaculture. These are general functionalities offered by ChatGPT, and other chatbots, and are mostly based on information available online. In this editorial of Reviews in Aquaculture, we wanted to go beyond the search for solely past information and, in a mix of scientific curiosity and trying to add extra fun in our daily research tasks, we asked ChatGPT to predict the future. We specifically explored its potential in predicting future trends in the aquafeed industry, inspired by the 6 out of 20 papers published in the current issue that directly focused on aquafeed or fish nutrition.4-9 For that, we asked two questions on future prediction and research guidance, and limited the output to 250 words. Prompts and responses are presented below:
Q1. What will the aquafeed industry look like by the end of the century?
{"title":"Science or science-fiction? Playing with ChatGPT to predict the future of the aquafeed industry","authors":"Sara M. Pinho, Giovanni M. Turchini","doi":"10.1111/raq.12935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12935","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technology continually reshapes our interactions with others and the broader society, with the environment, with the way we work and play, and possibly even the way we think. This continuous change seems to have recently accelerated by the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. For those like us who are not AI experts, a simpler way to understand AI might be as a combination of algorithms and technologies that enable machines to mimic human-like cognitive functions, including problem-solving, learning from experience, and recognising patterns, all guided by human commands.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Advanced AI capabilities, including complex machine learning algorithms and specialised decision-making processes, are predominantly found in paid platforms, tailored for industrial and collaborative use. Whereas other AI tools are freely available to the public and most of them engage with users in natural language conversations, that is, chatbots. Examples of such open-source AIs include Gemini (Google-based), Meta.ai (developed by Meta and integrated with their social media platforms), and ChatGPT (OpenAI). While each platform offers distinct features and functionalities, ChatGPT has notably revolutionised how the general public perceives and utilises AI tools.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has been adopted for conversational interactions and widely used for knowledge searches, marking a significant shift in the accessibility and usability of AI for everyday users.</p><p>In the context of aquaculture, AI has the potential to help us drive the activity towards more sustainable practices.<span><sup>3</sup></span> ChatGPT, for example, has surely been a source of information for many aquaculture students and farmers, and an additional tool for writing and researching for scientists. Most of us have probably used ChatGPT at least once for fun and curiosity, but possibly also to summarise information, provide definitions, interpret or translate a text, revise a code, or for searching an explanation on an unfamiliar concept related to aquaculture. These are general functionalities offered by ChatGPT, and other chatbots, and are mostly based on information available online. In this editorial of <i>Reviews in Aquaculture</i>, we wanted to go beyond the search for solely past information and, in a mix of scientific curiosity and trying to add extra fun in our daily research tasks, we asked ChatGPT to predict the future. We specifically explored its potential in predicting future trends in the aquafeed industry, inspired by the 6 out of 20 papers published in the current issue that directly focused on aquafeed or fish nutrition.<span><sup>4-9</sup></span> For that, we asked two questions on future prediction and research guidance, and limited the output to 250 words. Prompts and responses are presented below:</p><p><b>Q1. What will the aquafeed industry look like by the end of the century?</b></","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12935","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141425002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spanish abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12928","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12928","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Chinese abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12937","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12937","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Portuguese-Brazilian abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12940","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：