单侧特发性全厚黄斑孔和健康同侧眼的黄斑结构特征

Yi-Ting Hou, Chung-May Yang, Yi-Ting Hsieh
{"title":"单侧特发性全厚黄斑孔和健康同侧眼的黄斑结构特征","authors":"Yi-Ting Hou, Chung-May Yang, Yi-Ting Hsieh","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.16.24304402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of the macular structure and foveal pit in eyes with lesions and healthy fellow eyes of patients with unilateral full-thickness macular holes (FTMH).\nMethods: Patients with unilateral FTMH were retrospectively enrolled as the study group, and their age- and sex-matched individuals with no vitreomacular diseases as the control group in a medical center. FTMHs were classified as FTMH with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP), FTMH without LHEP or FTMH without vitreomacular separation. Macular structure parameters, including foveal base width (FBW), central foveolar thickness (CFT), central subfield thickness (CST), central subfield volume (CSV), and retinal artery trajectory (RAT), were measured using optical coherence tomography and fundus photography. These parameters were compared among different FTMH groups.\nResults: A total of 68 patients (39 women) with unilateral FTMH and 68 healthy controls were enrolled. The RAT of the lesioned eyes (0.19 ± 0.06) and the healthy fellow eyes (0.14 ± 0.04) were both smaller than those of the normal controls (0.37 ± 0.14) (P<0.001 for both). The FBW of the healthy fellow eyes (446.8 ± 98.2 μm) were significantly larger than those in the control group (338.4 ± 80.6 μm, P<0.001). No significant differences in any macular parameters were noted among the three different types of FTMH.\nConclusions: Patients with unilateral FTMH had a wider RAT in both the lesioned and healthy eyes, and a wider foveal base in their healthy fellow eyes than in normal controls. Such macular structure characteristics may be prone to macular hole formation.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macular Structure Characteristics in Unilateral Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole and the Healthy Fellow Eyes\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Ting Hou, Chung-May Yang, Yi-Ting Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.16.24304402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of the macular structure and foveal pit in eyes with lesions and healthy fellow eyes of patients with unilateral full-thickness macular holes (FTMH).\\nMethods: Patients with unilateral FTMH were retrospectively enrolled as the study group, and their age- and sex-matched individuals with no vitreomacular diseases as the control group in a medical center. FTMHs were classified as FTMH with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP), FTMH without LHEP or FTMH without vitreomacular separation. Macular structure parameters, including foveal base width (FBW), central foveolar thickness (CFT), central subfield thickness (CST), central subfield volume (CSV), and retinal artery trajectory (RAT), were measured using optical coherence tomography and fundus photography. These parameters were compared among different FTMH groups.\\nResults: A total of 68 patients (39 women) with unilateral FTMH and 68 healthy controls were enrolled. The RAT of the lesioned eyes (0.19 ± 0.06) and the healthy fellow eyes (0.14 ± 0.04) were both smaller than those of the normal controls (0.37 ± 0.14) (P<0.001 for both). The FBW of the healthy fellow eyes (446.8 ± 98.2 μm) were significantly larger than those in the control group (338.4 ± 80.6 μm, P<0.001). No significant differences in any macular parameters were noted among the three different types of FTMH.\\nConclusions: Patients with unilateral FTMH had a wider RAT in both the lesioned and healthy eyes, and a wider foveal base in their healthy fellow eyes than in normal controls. Such macular structure characteristics may be prone to macular hole formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.24304402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.24304402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究单侧全厚黄斑孔(FTMH)患者病变眼和健康同侧眼黄斑结构和眼窝凹的特征:方法:在一家医疗中心回顾性招募单侧全厚黄斑孔患者作为研究组,其年龄和性别匹配的无玻璃体疾病者作为对照组。FTMH分为伴有板层孔相关视网膜外增殖(LHEP)的FTMH、不伴有LHEP的FTMH和不伴有玻璃体白膜分离的FTMH。使用光学相干断层扫描和眼底摄影测量了黄斑结构参数,包括眼窝基底宽度(FBW)、中央眼窝厚度(CFT)、中央子场厚度(CST)、中央子场体积(CSV)和视网膜动脉轨迹(RAT)。这些参数在不同的 FTMH 组别中进行了比较:结果:共招募了 68 名单侧 FTMH 患者(39 名女性)和 68 名健康对照者。病变眼的 RAT(0.19 ± 0.06)和健康同侧眼的 RAT(0.14 ± 0.04)均小于正常对照组的 RAT(0.37 ± 0.14)(P<0.001)。健康同侧眼的 FBW(446.8 ± 98.2 μm)明显大于对照组(338.4 ± 80.6 μm,P<0.001)。三种不同类型的 FTMH 患者的黄斑参数均无明显差异:结论:与正常对照组相比,单侧 FTMH 患者病变眼和健康眼的 RAT 都更宽,健康同侧眼的眼窝基底也更宽。这种黄斑结构特征可能容易导致黄斑孔的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macular Structure Characteristics in Unilateral Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole and the Healthy Fellow Eyes
Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of the macular structure and foveal pit in eyes with lesions and healthy fellow eyes of patients with unilateral full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Methods: Patients with unilateral FTMH were retrospectively enrolled as the study group, and their age- and sex-matched individuals with no vitreomacular diseases as the control group in a medical center. FTMHs were classified as FTMH with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP), FTMH without LHEP or FTMH without vitreomacular separation. Macular structure parameters, including foveal base width (FBW), central foveolar thickness (CFT), central subfield thickness (CST), central subfield volume (CSV), and retinal artery trajectory (RAT), were measured using optical coherence tomography and fundus photography. These parameters were compared among different FTMH groups. Results: A total of 68 patients (39 women) with unilateral FTMH and 68 healthy controls were enrolled. The RAT of the lesioned eyes (0.19 ± 0.06) and the healthy fellow eyes (0.14 ± 0.04) were both smaller than those of the normal controls (0.37 ± 0.14) (P<0.001 for both). The FBW of the healthy fellow eyes (446.8 ± 98.2 μm) were significantly larger than those in the control group (338.4 ± 80.6 μm, P<0.001). No significant differences in any macular parameters were noted among the three different types of FTMH. Conclusions: Patients with unilateral FTMH had a wider RAT in both the lesioned and healthy eyes, and a wider foveal base in their healthy fellow eyes than in normal controls. Such macular structure characteristics may be prone to macular hole formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks Utilizing AI-Generated Plain Language Summaries to Enhance Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ophthalmology Notes: A Randomized Trial Deep Learning-Based Detection of Reticular Pseudodrusen in Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography Photoreceptor outer segment reflectivity with ultrahigh resolution visible light optical coherence tomography in systemic hydroxychloroquine use Comparison of visual function analysis of people with low vision using three different models of augmented reality devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1