应对青少年厌食症的家庭:基于家庭的治疗或其他干预措施中的家庭福祉。范围审查

Signe Holm Pedersen, Dorthe Andersen Waage, Nadia Micali, Mette Bentz
{"title":"应对青少年厌食症的家庭:基于家庭的治疗或其他干预措施中的家庭福祉。范围审查","authors":"Signe Holm Pedersen, Dorthe Andersen Waage, Nadia Micali, Mette Bentz","doi":"10.1007/s40519-024-01641-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Purpose</h3> <p>Family-based treatment (FBT) has contributed significantly to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP). However, parents are concerned that FBT and the active role of parents in the task of refeeding may have a negative impact on family relations. The aim of the review is to assess whether families engaged in FBT for AN are more or less impacted in their family wellbeing and caregiver burden, compared to families with a YP diagnosed with AN, who are not undergoing treatment with FBT.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Method</h3> <p>Computerized searches across six databases complemented by a manual search resulted in 30 papers being included in the scoping review.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>The review identified 19 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in families in FBT-like treatments, and 11 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in treatment where parents are not in charge of refeeding. Only three randomized controlled studies directly compare FBT to treatment without parent-led refeeding.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <p>The available research suggests no difference between intervention types regarding impact on family wellbeing. Approximately half of the studies find improvements in family wellbeing in both treatment with and without parent-led refeeding, while the same proportion find neither improvement nor deterioration. As parents play a pivotal role in FBT, there is a need for good quality studies to elucidate the impact of FBT on family wellbeing.</p> <p><strong>Level of evidence</strong> <em>Level V:</em> Opinions of authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":11391,"journal":{"name":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Families tackling adolescent anorexia nervosa: family wellbeing in family-based treatment or other interventions. A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Signe Holm Pedersen, Dorthe Andersen Waage, Nadia Micali, Mette Bentz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40519-024-01641-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Purpose</h3> <p>Family-based treatment (FBT) has contributed significantly to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP). However, parents are concerned that FBT and the active role of parents in the task of refeeding may have a negative impact on family relations. The aim of the review is to assess whether families engaged in FBT for AN are more or less impacted in their family wellbeing and caregiver burden, compared to families with a YP diagnosed with AN, who are not undergoing treatment with FBT.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Method</h3> <p>Computerized searches across six databases complemented by a manual search resulted in 30 papers being included in the scoping review.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>The review identified 19 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in families in FBT-like treatments, and 11 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in treatment where parents are not in charge of refeeding. Only three randomized controlled studies directly compare FBT to treatment without parent-led refeeding.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <p>The available research suggests no difference between intervention types regarding impact on family wellbeing. Approximately half of the studies find improvements in family wellbeing in both treatment with and without parent-led refeeding, while the same proportion find neither improvement nor deterioration. As parents play a pivotal role in FBT, there is a need for good quality studies to elucidate the impact of FBT on family wellbeing.</p> <p><strong>Level of evidence</strong> <em>Level V:</em> Opinions of authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.</p> </span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-024-01641-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-024-01641-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 以家庭为基础的治疗(FBT)为治疗青少年厌食症(AN)做出了巨大贡献。然而,家长们担心家庭为基础的治疗以及家长在再喂养任务中的积极作用可能会对家庭关系产生负面影响。本综述旨在评估,与有确诊为厌食症的青少年但未接受 FBT 治疗的家庭相比,参与厌食症 FBT 治疗的家庭在家庭幸福和照顾者负担方面受到的影响是大还是小。 方法 在六个数据库中进行计算机检索,并辅以人工检索,最终将 30 篇论文纳入范围界定综述。 结果 该综述发现了 19 项关于类似 FBT 治疗的家庭中家庭幸福变化的纵向研究,以及 11 项关于父母不负责再喂养的治疗中家庭幸福变化的纵向研究。只有三项随机对照研究直接比较了家庭支持疗法和不由家长负责喂养的疗法。 结论 现有的研究表明,不同干预类型对家庭幸福的影响没有差异。约有一半的研究发现,在有家长主导的再喂养治疗和无家长主导的再喂养治疗中,家庭幸福都有所改善,而同样比例的研究发现,家庭幸福既没有改善,也没有恶化。由于父母在家庭支持疗法中发挥着关键作用,因此有必要开展高质量的研究,以阐明家庭支持疗法对家庭幸福的影响。证据等级 V 级:基于描述性研究、叙述性综述、临床经验或专家委员会报告的权威意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Families tackling adolescent anorexia nervosa: family wellbeing in family-based treatment or other interventions. A scoping review

Abstract

Purpose

Family-based treatment (FBT) has contributed significantly to the treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP). However, parents are concerned that FBT and the active role of parents in the task of refeeding may have a negative impact on family relations. The aim of the review is to assess whether families engaged in FBT for AN are more or less impacted in their family wellbeing and caregiver burden, compared to families with a YP diagnosed with AN, who are not undergoing treatment with FBT.

Method

Computerized searches across six databases complemented by a manual search resulted in 30 papers being included in the scoping review.

Results

The review identified 19 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in families in FBT-like treatments, and 11 longitudinal studies on change in family wellbeing in treatment where parents are not in charge of refeeding. Only three randomized controlled studies directly compare FBT to treatment without parent-led refeeding.

Conclusion

The available research suggests no difference between intervention types regarding impact on family wellbeing. Approximately half of the studies find improvements in family wellbeing in both treatment with and without parent-led refeeding, while the same proportion find neither improvement nor deterioration. As parents play a pivotal role in FBT, there is a need for good quality studies to elucidate the impact of FBT on family wellbeing.

Level of evidence Level V: Opinions of authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity is a scientific journal whose main purpose is to create an international forum devoted to the several sectors of eating disorders and obesity and the significant relations between them. The journal publishes basic research, clinical and theoretical articles on eating disorders and weight-related problems: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, subthreshold eating disorders, obesity, atypical patterns of eating behaviour and body weight regulation in clinical and non-clinical populations.
期刊最新文献
Association of weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and a body shape index (ABSI) with serum neurofilament light chain levels in a national study of U.S. adults. Longitudinal evolution of physical activity type and eating and weight concerns among adolescents. Comparative analysis of dietary vs. non-dietary approaches in obesity and disordered eating behaviors: a narrative review of the literature. Psychometric properties of the ORTO-R in an adult population: the Turkish version, reliability, and validity study. The Dutch Body Shape Questionnaire among patients with binge-eating disorder: psychometrics and norms of the full version (BSQ34) and the short version (BSQ8C).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1