生物医学工程课程开发:由四个利益相关方参与的定性研究

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1111/ejed.12632
Rita Prestigiacomo, Chun Chuen Chan, Lauren Kark
{"title":"生物医学工程课程开发:由四个利益相关方参与的定性研究","authors":"Rita Prestigiacomo,&nbsp;Chun Chuen Chan,&nbsp;Lauren Kark","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomedical engineering is critical in improving people's lives through innovative solutions to biological and medical challenges. In the face of today's rapidly evolving climate, the field of biomedical engineering encounters numerous pressures that demand up-to-date skills and competencies. The (re-)development of curricula aligning with industry and societal needs, students' expectations, and academics' expertise while outlining graduates' knowledge (that) and abilities (how) becomes indispensable despite the challenges and complexities presented by conflicting priorities, tight timelines, and scarce resources. This paper presents a qualitative study conducted by a biomedical engineering graduate school at an Australian university. The study engaged four key stakeholders—industry partners, recent graduates, current academics, and students—in a self-auditing process of an existing biomedical engineering curriculum. This exercise aimed to identify priorities for the future development of the curriculum. The findings reveal the perspectives from the four stakeholder groups, with industry partners and recent graduates focusing on technical and transferable skills and current students and academic staff advocating for breadth and a more practice-oriented curriculum, where transdisciplinarity should inform biomedical engineering education. We propose that this evidence-based and bottom-up approach with multiple stakeholders holds potential implications for fields beyond biomedical engineering education. It provides valuable guidance to educational institutions seeking to (re-)develop their curricula to align with evolving industry and society demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12632","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A biomedical engineering curriculum development: A qualitative study engaging four stakeholders\",\"authors\":\"Rita Prestigiacomo,&nbsp;Chun Chuen Chan,&nbsp;Lauren Kark\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.12632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biomedical engineering is critical in improving people's lives through innovative solutions to biological and medical challenges. In the face of today's rapidly evolving climate, the field of biomedical engineering encounters numerous pressures that demand up-to-date skills and competencies. The (re-)development of curricula aligning with industry and societal needs, students' expectations, and academics' expertise while outlining graduates' knowledge (that) and abilities (how) becomes indispensable despite the challenges and complexities presented by conflicting priorities, tight timelines, and scarce resources. This paper presents a qualitative study conducted by a biomedical engineering graduate school at an Australian university. The study engaged four key stakeholders—industry partners, recent graduates, current academics, and students—in a self-auditing process of an existing biomedical engineering curriculum. This exercise aimed to identify priorities for the future development of the curriculum. The findings reveal the perspectives from the four stakeholder groups, with industry partners and recent graduates focusing on technical and transferable skills and current students and academic staff advocating for breadth and a more practice-oriented curriculum, where transdisciplinarity should inform biomedical engineering education. We propose that this evidence-based and bottom-up approach with multiple stakeholders holds potential implications for fields beyond biomedical engineering education. It provides valuable guidance to educational institutions seeking to (re-)develop their curricula to align with evolving industry and society demands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12632\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12632\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物医学工程在通过创新解决方案解决生物和医学难题来改善人们的生活方面至关重要。面对当今快速发展的环境,生物医学工程领域面临着众多压力,需要掌握最新的技能和能力。尽管优先事项相互冲突、时间紧迫、资源匮乏等问题带来了挑战和复杂性,但根据行业和社会的需求、学生的期望以及学术界的专业知识(重新)开发课程,同时概述毕业生的知识(是什么)和能力(如何),已成为不可或缺的工作。本文介绍了澳大利亚一所大学生物医学工程研究生院开展的一项定性研究。该研究让四个主要利益相关者--行业合作伙伴、应届毕业生、在校学者和学生--参与到对现有生物医学工程课程的自我审核过程中。这项工作旨在确定课程未来发展的重点。研究结果揭示了四个利益相关群体的观点,其中行业合作伙伴和应届毕业生关注技术和可迁移技能,在校学生和教职员工则主张课程的广度和更加注重实践,跨学科性应贯穿于生物医学工程教育中。我们认为,这种以证据为基础、自下而上、多方参与的方法对生物医学工程教育以外的领域具有潜在影响。它为教育机构寻求(重新)开发其课程以适应不断发展的行业和社会需求提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A biomedical engineering curriculum development: A qualitative study engaging four stakeholders

Biomedical engineering is critical in improving people's lives through innovative solutions to biological and medical challenges. In the face of today's rapidly evolving climate, the field of biomedical engineering encounters numerous pressures that demand up-to-date skills and competencies. The (re-)development of curricula aligning with industry and societal needs, students' expectations, and academics' expertise while outlining graduates' knowledge (that) and abilities (how) becomes indispensable despite the challenges and complexities presented by conflicting priorities, tight timelines, and scarce resources. This paper presents a qualitative study conducted by a biomedical engineering graduate school at an Australian university. The study engaged four key stakeholders—industry partners, recent graduates, current academics, and students—in a self-auditing process of an existing biomedical engineering curriculum. This exercise aimed to identify priorities for the future development of the curriculum. The findings reveal the perspectives from the four stakeholder groups, with industry partners and recent graduates focusing on technical and transferable skills and current students and academic staff advocating for breadth and a more practice-oriented curriculum, where transdisciplinarity should inform biomedical engineering education. We propose that this evidence-based and bottom-up approach with multiple stakeholders holds potential implications for fields beyond biomedical engineering education. It provides valuable guidance to educational institutions seeking to (re-)develop their curricula to align with evolving industry and society demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Engaging in social innovation education: Reciprocal relations between student wellbeing and programme wellbeing outcomes Explaining Temporal Trends in School‐Related Stress: A Decomposition Analysis of Repeated Swedish Survey Data Virtual Reality Technology in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Study A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualisation of Digital Teaching and Learning Publications From Southeast Asia Countries Workload and Need for Recovery in the Academy: The Moderating Role of Student Demands and Meaningful Work Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1