脊柱的矢状平衡--腰椎前凸还是腰骶前凸?

Kai Song, Pengfei Chi, Qiang Yang, Cao Yang, Bing Wang, Fangcai Li, Zezhang Zhu, Weishi Li, Jianguo Zhang, Zheng Wang
{"title":"脊柱的矢状平衡--腰椎前凸还是腰骶前凸?","authors":"Kai Song, Pengfei Chi, Qiang Yang, Cao Yang, Bing Wang, Fangcai Li, Zezhang Zhu, Weishi Li, Jianguo Zhang, Zheng Wang","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.19.24304424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate sagittal spinal alignment from the perspective of the overall curvature of the \"S\" curve of the human spine, and explore the roles of pelvic incidence (PI) and maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax) in the classification of the sagittal spinal aligment.\nMethods: The tilt of the sacral, lumbar, and thoracic vertebrae (from Co1, S5, S4... to C7) were measured. The minimal sacral vertebral tilt(Smin), maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax), and minimal thoracic vertebral tilt (Tmin) were recorded. The concept of lumbosacral lordosis (LSL) was introduced, and the Ferguson method was utilized to measure sagittal spinal parameters both in anatomical segmentation (Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12) and functional segmentation (Ferguson LSLmax, Ferguson TKmax). The subjects were grouped based on pelvic incidence (PI) and TLmax separately, and the mean and standard deviation of each parameter were calculated. Chi-square tests were conducted for statistical analysis.\nResults: 1. Based on PI grouping: PI for all subjects was 45.4 ± 9.5°(21.7-86.4°). Group A consisted of 117 subjects with a mean PI of 34.7 ± 4.4°, Group B had 158 subjects with a mean PI of 45.2 ± 2.9°, and Group C included 113 subjects with a mean PI of 56.7 ± 5.8°. No statistically significant differences were found in tilt of S2, L1, T1, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C. 2. Based on TLmax grouping: TLmax for all subjects was 110.5 ± 5.5° (94.4-132.0°). Group A had 91 subjects with a mean TLmax of 104.0 ± 2.3°, Group B comprised 216 subjects with a mean TLmax of 110.2 ± 2.1°, and Group C included 81 subjects with a mean TLmax of 118.6 ± 3.8°. Significant statistical differences were observed in tilt of S2, L1, T1, Smin, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, Ferguson LSLmax, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C.\nConclusion: There were no differences in the magnitude of LSL and TK among subjects with different PI, indicating that PI does not affect the overall curvature of the \"S\" curve in the sagittal spinal aligment. In contrast, TLmax effectively distinguishes the overall curvature of the \"S\" curve.\nKeywords: Sagittal spinal alignment; Sagittal spinal curvature; Lumbosacral lordosis; Pelvic incidence; Maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt.","PeriodicalId":501263,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sagittal balance of the spine - lumbar lordosis or lumbosacral lordosis?\",\"authors\":\"Kai Song, Pengfei Chi, Qiang Yang, Cao Yang, Bing Wang, Fangcai Li, Zezhang Zhu, Weishi Li, Jianguo Zhang, Zheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.19.24304424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate sagittal spinal alignment from the perspective of the overall curvature of the \\\"S\\\" curve of the human spine, and explore the roles of pelvic incidence (PI) and maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax) in the classification of the sagittal spinal aligment.\\nMethods: The tilt of the sacral, lumbar, and thoracic vertebrae (from Co1, S5, S4... to C7) were measured. The minimal sacral vertebral tilt(Smin), maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax), and minimal thoracic vertebral tilt (Tmin) were recorded. The concept of lumbosacral lordosis (LSL) was introduced, and the Ferguson method was utilized to measure sagittal spinal parameters both in anatomical segmentation (Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12) and functional segmentation (Ferguson LSLmax, Ferguson TKmax). The subjects were grouped based on pelvic incidence (PI) and TLmax separately, and the mean and standard deviation of each parameter were calculated. Chi-square tests were conducted for statistical analysis.\\nResults: 1. Based on PI grouping: PI for all subjects was 45.4 ± 9.5°(21.7-86.4°). Group A consisted of 117 subjects with a mean PI of 34.7 ± 4.4°, Group B had 158 subjects with a mean PI of 45.2 ± 2.9°, and Group C included 113 subjects with a mean PI of 56.7 ± 5.8°. No statistically significant differences were found in tilt of S2, L1, T1, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C. 2. Based on TLmax grouping: TLmax for all subjects was 110.5 ± 5.5° (94.4-132.0°). Group A had 91 subjects with a mean TLmax of 104.0 ± 2.3°, Group B comprised 216 subjects with a mean TLmax of 110.2 ± 2.1°, and Group C included 81 subjects with a mean TLmax of 118.6 ± 3.8°. Significant statistical differences were observed in tilt of S2, L1, T1, Smin, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, Ferguson LSLmax, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C.\\nConclusion: There were no differences in the magnitude of LSL and TK among subjects with different PI, indicating that PI does not affect the overall curvature of the \\\"S\\\" curve in the sagittal spinal aligment. In contrast, TLmax effectively distinguishes the overall curvature of the \\\"S\\\" curve.\\nKeywords: Sagittal spinal alignment; Sagittal spinal curvature; Lumbosacral lordosis; Pelvic incidence; Maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的从人体脊柱 "S "曲线的整体弧度角度研究脊柱矢状排列,并探讨骨盆入射角(PI)和胸腰椎最大倾斜度(TLmax)在脊柱矢状排列分类中的作用:方法:测量骶椎、腰椎和胸椎(从Co1、S5、S4......到C7)的倾斜度。记录最小骶椎倾斜度(Smin)、最大胸腰椎倾斜度(TLmax)和最小胸椎倾斜度(Tmin)。引入了腰骶椎前凸(LSL)的概念,并利用弗格森方法测量解剖分段(弗格森 L1-S2、弗格森 T1-T12)和功能分段(弗格森 LSLmax、弗格森 TKmax)的矢状脊柱参数。根据骨盆入射角(PI)和TLmax分别对受试者进行分组,并计算每个参数的平均值和标准偏差。统计分析采用卡方检验:1.根据 PI 分组:所有受试者的 PI 为 45.4 ± 9.5°(21.7-86.4°)。A 组有 117 名受试者,平均 PI 为 34.7 ± 4.4°;B 组有 158 名受试者,平均 PI 为 45.2 ± 2.9°;C 组有 113 名受试者,平均 PI 为 56.7 ± 5.8°。A 组、B 组和 C 组的 S2、L1、T1、TLmax、Tmin 以及 Ferguson L1-S2、Ferguson T1-T12 和 Ferguson TKmax 的倾斜度在统计学上没有发现明显差异。 根据 TLmax 分组:所有受试者的 TLmax 为 110.5 ± 5.5°(94.4-132.0°)。A 组有 91 名受试者,平均 TLmax 为 104.0 ± 2.3°;B 组有 216 名受试者,平均 TLmax 为 110.2 ± 2.1°;C 组有 81 名受试者,平均 TLmax 为 118.6 ± 3.8°。A 组、B 组和 C 组的 S2、L1、T1、Smin、TLmax、Tmin 以及 Ferguson L1-S2、Ferguson T1-T12、Ferguson LSLmax 和 Ferguson TKmax 的倾斜度存在显著的统计学差异:结论:不同 PI 的受试者在 LSL 和 TK 的大小上没有差异,这表明 PI 不会影响矢状脊柱结节 "S "曲线的整体弯曲度。相反,TLmax能有效区分 "S "曲线的整体曲率:矢状脊柱对齐;矢状脊柱曲率;腰骶部前凸;骨盆入射角;最大胸腰椎倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sagittal balance of the spine - lumbar lordosis or lumbosacral lordosis?
Objective: To investigate sagittal spinal alignment from the perspective of the overall curvature of the "S" curve of the human spine, and explore the roles of pelvic incidence (PI) and maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax) in the classification of the sagittal spinal aligment. Methods: The tilt of the sacral, lumbar, and thoracic vertebrae (from Co1, S5, S4... to C7) were measured. The minimal sacral vertebral tilt(Smin), maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax), and minimal thoracic vertebral tilt (Tmin) were recorded. The concept of lumbosacral lordosis (LSL) was introduced, and the Ferguson method was utilized to measure sagittal spinal parameters both in anatomical segmentation (Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12) and functional segmentation (Ferguson LSLmax, Ferguson TKmax). The subjects were grouped based on pelvic incidence (PI) and TLmax separately, and the mean and standard deviation of each parameter were calculated. Chi-square tests were conducted for statistical analysis. Results: 1. Based on PI grouping: PI for all subjects was 45.4 ± 9.5°(21.7-86.4°). Group A consisted of 117 subjects with a mean PI of 34.7 ± 4.4°, Group B had 158 subjects with a mean PI of 45.2 ± 2.9°, and Group C included 113 subjects with a mean PI of 56.7 ± 5.8°. No statistically significant differences were found in tilt of S2, L1, T1, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C. 2. Based on TLmax grouping: TLmax for all subjects was 110.5 ± 5.5° (94.4-132.0°). Group A had 91 subjects with a mean TLmax of 104.0 ± 2.3°, Group B comprised 216 subjects with a mean TLmax of 110.2 ± 2.1°, and Group C included 81 subjects with a mean TLmax of 118.6 ± 3.8°. Significant statistical differences were observed in tilt of S2, L1, T1, Smin, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, Ferguson LSLmax, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C. Conclusion: There were no differences in the magnitude of LSL and TK among subjects with different PI, indicating that PI does not affect the overall curvature of the "S" curve in the sagittal spinal aligment. In contrast, TLmax effectively distinguishes the overall curvature of the "S" curve. Keywords: Sagittal spinal alignment; Sagittal spinal curvature; Lumbosacral lordosis; Pelvic incidence; Maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do editorial board members publish in their own journal? Review of editorial board members as authors in the main foot and ankle journals Evolving cartilage strain with pain progression and gait: a longitudinal study post-ACL reconstruction at six and twelve months PIEZO1 variants that reduce open channel probability are associated with familial osteoarthritis Role of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Conversational Agents (Chatbots) in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review Protocol Stay or go? Outcomes of lower limb arthroplasty in patients travelling away from home for surgery: A cross-sectional analysis of the AOANJRR comparing patient residence and hospital remoteness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1